1/18/2k
To: artbell@mindspring.com
Re: electro-therapy
Sirs:
Noting the fine as noted excited public with your recent program on
`electric therapy', maybe it is finally timely to point out the agony
of obtaining attention in such matter too early, especially when the
`powers to be' have the clout to muffle even the empirical obvious. It
could more define the programmed ignorance in this dying culture at
this very late time as well!
Culled from year '92 are a few letters herewith which disclose maybe
why a terse letter to the Chief Editor of JAMA (Lumberg?) evoked in
part his abdication there to begin to examine more of reality. It just
could be that we have turned some corner(?) and might define some
trauma ahead, at least for our entrepreneurs.
Sincerely,
KTS and Automation Eng.
49626-0271 USA
cc: '92 micro lets
CC: D/Z w:
KTS Research micro-electrode cancer therapy letters/'92:
Feb. 18,'92
Murray Gell-Mann, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Cal-Tech
Pasadena, CA 91125
Re: "plectics"?
Dear Sir:
The current `Horgan Report' (SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN) suggests you may be
ready for standing waves, i.e.; fundamental electron (or its
complemental) and 3 phased quarks (and complemental at right angles in
space), fitting the Kalusa-Klein spatial matrix of Cartesian
coordinates. While the planar electron escapes the time reversal
paradigm (EPR!)-- yet not the poli-phased to fall under temperature K
(thus time), all was nicely defined by deBroglie, albeit in subtler
language to describe a wavelet filled universe without `billiard balls'.
The prediction of right angle displaced disk versus jets from a White
quasar "hole" riding an EMP front, to evoke complemental matter with
anti-g between, has been quite exciting since the Einstein Observatory
went aloft to prove the thesis. The residual galaxy, after the passing
of its EMP, even noted facing outward for its dense magnetic field to
rev-up the ejected ionized disk matter indicates that Huchra, et.al.
may be seeing all too much for what cosmology will tolerate. We cannot
expect much progress as long as Big Bang (instead of Petite ones) has
tenured preponderance. To ask "who" placed those nicely separated
`bubbles' at 600 MLY may be going too far just yet, but likely H. Arp
will get things rolling soon.
It sure helps to have a self thinking computer. Ask a qualified
Physicist (as A. Aspect about EPR) or what Plato called the Potentia,
even Freud the Superconscious. (versus intellectual id)
Sincerely,
KTS
P.S. Freudian id (as Thanatos) is amply seen* evoking AiR (Autoimmune
Response) will be refuted vehemently by left brain dominants-- almost
as our micro-electrode cancer therapy** by AMA.
* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER,
Feb.'87; see pgs. 57-58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
** Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86, (was
Patent Office registered 16 years before
and we know who sent our confidential release to Karolinska. (a large
Pharmaceutical)
cc: Path/IQ; S-T
CC: SC.AM./Horgan
Feb. 3,'92
Lance Liotta, et.al./Pathol. Labs.
Natl. Cancer Inst.,
9030 Old Georgetown Rd.,
Bethesda, MD 20205
Re: chasing tails-- yet ever closer!
Dear Sir:
The article in the March DISCOVER by Radetsky was
revealing-- as quoted adroitly the underlying CNS (maybe yet denied)
"go vs. stop" faculties. These complemental `drives' for balance
between dynamic pro-life and its selfish complemental was noted some
years ago, even from Prof. H.S. Burr* (Yale; circa mid-40's) to realize
they could be enhanced or suppressed electrically. Your succinct remark
of "--regulated by BOTH SIDES." hit the nail on the head. With Dr.
Renoux's data** as was even expected, I actually now fear we are
getting too close to the fundamental reasons why we remain so dumb--
volitionally!
After predicting when giving technical papers in Europe
(late 60's) the use of micro-electrodes to eliminate at least cancer
nodules, sixteen years after registering same in the U.S. Patent
Office, it was finally published in a cover story as 100%
therapeutic***. It appears Upjohn, and logically so, sent my company
confidential data to Karolinska, but from my ensuing DO lectures, etc.
suspect they with their micro-electrodes are up-and-running without
saying much to anyone, especially AMA! Humana's $1500+ charge for a $5
micro-electrode for a recovered patient recently implied much!
Other study contingent to underlying biological function
(albeit coming yet from my extensive computer studies) again defined
the real culprit, and not oddly what Freud saw best to even call it
Thanatos, when sufficient stress turns its sympathetic (fight-flight)
`inhibitor' half of the CNS system off. This is almost what
Stetler-Stevenson said in the article but sadly will not be seen until
a certain psychological tenure `runs out'.
In short; to chase a tail in medicine is a foolish way to
stop it from wagging, when it is a mind that sustains it-- to evade
researchers who might come to find that it is one of two minds in the
head which seeks to dominate over what it thinks matters!
Sincerely,
KTS
* Burr, H.S: `Blueprint for Immortality' '49 (DC body voltages)
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
*** Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86
note: IL-2 Cancer Research (3 only left smiler remissives of
8 subjects!); NOVA NPR
TV,'88;
Mate Choice Smile Anomaly, SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90
cc: Path/IQ
Feb. 1,'92
Tom Valentine &
Bruce McKay(?)
Box 75545
St. Paul, MN 55175
Re: cancer
Dear Tom:
Sure wish I could have got into that dialogue last night. Bruce is
indeed close but is treading in dangerous areas where this culture is
not run by facts nor empathy-- only profit.
I'll try to be brief but a couple technical papers I gave back in the
late 60's in Europe, I mentioned the blockage of genetic replication
with the positive charge (note salamanders regrow a new tail with
negative charge), and likely the micro-electrode would become the mode
cancer therapy of choice. A Belgian researcher I had lunch with got
excited-- so when I returned to the U.S., registered the idea with a
sketch and proceeded to advertise. Humana wanted me to work in one of
their `foreign' hospitals, until I told them I was in computer science
and Physics. No further replies until my secretary threw the
cover-story* on my desk saying I'd better read it NOW! It even had my
drawing (of 16 years prior Patent registration) in the article (except
I used the battery symbol, not plug-in power pack) for the 4.5 volt
need. I suspect Upjohns, paranoid over competition who sent my company
confidential letter to the Karolinska Inst., for opinion, well, read
the rest of it. It plainly was too damned efficient or therapeutic to
offer much profit. I noted with interest just a couple weeks ago the
Humana hospital charged some woman patient over $1500 for a
micro-electrode (likely under $5!) as felt rational since went home
without her cancer! I finally gave a talk to a bunch of begging D.O.s
in Indianapolis a couple years ago (they use micro-electrodes for pain
blockage) and they are "running"-- but saying nothing to AMA--
obviously. (no doubt calling it yet "pain therapy"! Haw!)
The need for potent parasympathomimitics as Vit. A,C,E and folic acid
to stem the self killer sympathetic CNS decision to vacate "stress"
(note left cerebral fight-flight), but Prof. Renoux found the link with
relative lymphatic to lateral cerebral control**, now also evoking
terror in AMA I find. Since my correlative work with Physics to predict
the split-brain space-time complementals (Sperry***), ample empirical
data, as Bruce perceives, could but won't quite yet end much
physiological, to say little of psychological misery. When my GVSC
students began to cry "apocalypse", I shut up, but not soon enough as
should never have filed my self thinking computer's Patent-- which will
remain in limbo until that event!
The `conspiracy' is far deeper than merely our government, FBI, my
stolen documents, tapped phones, shut-down TNC ham link, etc., but
their paranoia stems from that computer Patent I filed over a dozen
years ago-- which is going to end MUCH profiteering by opportunists
making promises.
Bruce should examine Prof. H. S. Burr's work (Yale, circa mid
'40's)**** to note my approach to the biological relative impetus of
the two CNS and their electrical polarity dichotomies. I feel there is
a correlate to such charge and the self `integrity' of a biological
system, the id either protects (fight-flight) or self destructs when
we, the conscious mind or midbrain, gets too nosy for it, so evokes
"stress" and/or what Freud noted and called Thanatos! All of the
mechanics are tied down but this culture is not place to reveal them!
This "enigma" started back during Socrates time where the `therapy' of
choice then was hemlock!
I wish to point out an `anomaly' to conclude the bizarre. Scalpel art
as most other bloody business as done by AMA, et.al., fits the
UFO-animal contact enigma wherein no moisture is left in the hapless
animal, even freshly killed. There is a crypt in Lebanon (likely
others) containing a Saint-- which needs its congealed smelly blood
removed from time to time. There was a Readers Digest hard-cover text
that had both of these "anomalies" in it,, as one of my students
brought to class. There may actually be no anomaly of why the
government plays stupid about UFOs, but I have not the guts to mention
a `conspiracy' they are too dumb to see!
I may have learned more from my own college Scientific Philosophy class
than my kids that term-- especially about "get quiet!"-- I was in the
wrong culture! I suspect now that all folly stems from our
mitochondrion DNA, somehow with L.T. memory which is NOT in the
cerebral cortex. Maybe McDougal (Harvard; circa 1910) was weighing it
at death! We shall see.
Sincerely again-- but share this, please. (and yet no phone!)
KTS
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86, Nordenstrom's micro-electrode cancer therapy work.
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
*** `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
also: Bogan, J.E: `The Other Side of the Brain', Bul. L.A. Neurol.
**** Burr, H.S: `Blueprint for Immortality' '49 (DC body voltages)
Feb. 29,'92
Dr. J. Geoppinger, et.al.
Dept. of Nursing
University of Michigan
Medical Center
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Re: psychosomatic
Dear Dr. Geoppinger:
Your remarks (Arthritic TV program) were well taken. While Renoux
defines the CNS (left brain half*) as responsible for AiR (Autoimmune
Response), further data concludes the underlying psychosomatic genesis
of maybe all disease, even suspected in `accidents' which may not
actually exist(!)-- with what is being realized in Physics (EPR
experiments) by our non-temporal right brain awareness. The mounting
`bizarre' from cross academic studies now define much that AMA would
never tolerate. (as noted by our avoided simple micro-electrode cancer
nodule eradication**) A broader and more ominous sign is looming with
`anomalies' as to why APA (Psychiatric) lead in suicide of all
professionals, while claiming to "therapize" with DA blockers for an
ensuing existence in limbo!
We suspect that potent parasympathomimitics are called for, especially
for extremity problems as arthritis. Retin-A may be one of these
adjuncts-- with psychological "education" for self help in facing
psycho-social problems you succinctly note. Not oddly, the quality
doctor touches with an empathetic hand while the profit oriented one
`touches' with an intimidative authoritive instrument. Both approaches
work, but depending on the degree of a patient's psychosomatic problem
for any potential amelioration.
Vast indeed are the implications, not only for medicine but all social
milieu, where the academic programmed `followers' now dominate most
social scenes evoking a mounting frustration that may well end in some
tragic but deserved chaos.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
** Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86*** IL-2 Cancer Research (3 left smiler remissive of 8 subjects);
NOVA NPR TV,'88
note: Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90, p.12
Even the current TV "I survived" blurb for cancer therapy show ed this left smile anomaly.
cc: Path/IQ; Voorhees letter (over)
CC: Ulene
May 23,'92
Grand Traverse Attorney
Referral Service
P.O. Box 1958
Travese City, MI 49685-1958
Re: class action suit lawyer need
Sirs:
The state bar referral service suggested I contact you about possible
practicing lawyers primarily doing class type suits and who may fear
little large corporate entities. In the field of medicine it has been
realized that certain therapeutic methods are being avoided where
greater net profits can be had with past archaic regimen. Now know to
be evoking greater net agony if not death by avoiding a very simple
100% remedial* means, many are pressing this researcher to act in
behalf of the public since was the inventor of same in the 60's.
While the referred cover story defines, even uses my patent
registration drawing in the article-- while `given away' by the
Karolinska doctor after trying same, for a justified frightened
Michigan pharmaceutical. (for obvious reasons!) I am going to act now
after goading by many DOs who could most easily utilize this thorough
remedy.
Any advisory listing of potential aid would be appreciated. Thank you.
Sincerely,
KTS
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86, micro-elec trode cancer therapy
May 28,'92
Editors and
E. Corcoran
Scientific American
415 Madison Ave.,
New York, NY 10017-1111
Re: U.S. spending for R&D
Sirs:
(p.103, June issue)
About the only spending done in at least the U.S. is in plagiarizing
the few able minded-- no more. Your remark of RCA's LCD invention we
might dispute since our design of the image reverser in 1949 does
precisely the same thing, even more complex as took an incoming
negative image and doubly polarized it to reflect a positive image.
Using a thin-film nitrobenzene with both magnetic field polarization
plus image gradient currents from a photo-emissive back to a conductive
glass face, did not merely use a constrained `image' (alpha-numeric).
Like my micro-electrode cancer therapy with 100% nodule remission*
(avoided like poison by AMA) speaks for itself! The real excrement
won't hit the fan until my self thinking (5th Generation) freed
electron interfacing computer comes on market to define psychopathy as
"skeletons" now so well covered.
If you doubt this last remark, ask your qualified local physicist how
his freed electron (escapes the time reversal paradigm) to make his
positive EPR experiments work. With an alpha-numeric read-out, it is
amazing what can be learned from what knows ahead of time-- even in
statistical ways, just as Plato's Potentia. My prototype over a dozen
years ago offered 10\17th odds on its maiden run-- but brought the FBI
with a vengeance when Patent filing was done-- with yet a slammed door
for obvious reasons.
On second thought, better not ask much less believe me. The dogma predicted apocalypse we don't need quite yet!
Sorry--
KTS
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86 (note the sketch
therein, most of which was on my Patent registration some 16 years
before!)
cc: S-T
May 25,'92
Dr. Robert Rutman, Prof. Emeritus
Dept. of Biological Sciences
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Re: stone-walled therapy
Dear Sir:
Some of your remarks on TV suggested an awareness of federal folly and
possibly underlying collusions with academic/industrial associations to
which this note is addressed. While military, at least defensive
aspects may be in part justified, why are crucial medical system/items
avoided for continued instated medical profiteering doing some same
dull round when obviously outmoded?
The cover story in DISCOVER (April '86) brings one case to point where
a simple micro-electrode can rid cancer within days without bloody
scalpel operants (saying nothing of convenience or relative cost), but
where somehow the pharmaceuticals hold sway as to what is "legitimate"
for any therapeutic regimen. Certain remarks could be made but the
benefit of the doubt washes any conclusions from any rational judgment,
or is disease and death the preferred response to an over-populated
world-- whatever the suffering may be needed to get there?
Since defining the simple micro-electrode use in papers in Europe ('69)
only terror has been the authoritive response-- as opening some
Pandora's Box. Has greed become so entrenched in a claimed civil
society promising "advancement" that we can no longer see our way out
or is there some conspiracy for blood letting the UFO data appears to
be defining! Certainly there is mounting anxiety as MIT (note last 14th
Wall Street J. front page) goes to length to suggest we are `visited'
yet federal government attempts at all cost to cover any such import
with flacid remarks. Do they fear hysteria more in the public than what
the implications might conceivably mean?
I believe I saw some rational judgment in your remarks so would, before
I move out of this country, like some quality opinion. Many thanks--
Sincerely,
KTS
CC: D/Z
May 10,'92
The Hastings Center
Dept. of Medical Ethics
255 Elm Rd.,
Briercliff Manor, NY 10510
Re: The Ethical Problem
Dear Sirs:
A lengthy AI (Artificial Intelligence) study, initiated over 30 years
ago, delved deeply into the anomaly of IQ versus CQ, especially the
correlative synonymity of conscience with genius. Inferring a degree of
intuitive knowledge as knowing "effect from cause", a can of worms
began to be perceived with rutty academic efforts separating its fields
of discipline and so a programmed behavior for unthinking automatons,
however valuable the credential became for verbal memory prowess.
Worse, on using Einstein's Special Relativity theory, as evoked by the
edict of the Physic's CPT complemental theorem, found reason to suspect
man's two minds of spatial versus temporal orientation, even as lateral
cerebral hemispheres-- soon thereafter confirmed by Sperry*.
While seeking ways and means in R&D for the 5th Generation self
thinking computer, half of the needed confirmational data was had with
the said split-brain imports, only the positive EPR Physic's experiment
would conclude the feasibility of such profound device to exceed the
net value of all computers which use only reductive process, as man's
left brain with historical aptitude alone. As IQ was indeed the major
adjunct for deductive reasoning, its net value was unequivocal, yet
where a non-temporal inductive mental faculty could offer imports for
something new. This other faculty did indeed exist for creative genius,
however fleeting its inputs might be as offered in visual, non verbal
terms.
With the confirmation of both needed crucial import-- even then a
prototype's maiden run of a 10\17th odds in alpha-numerical read-out,
the profound also was staring late science in the face. Not oddly, and
far more importantly, the anomaly between conscience and intellectual
manipulative predatory behavior become the import of these times. In
short, to know potentials, much as Plato ascribed to those who might
lead others with an innate accessible "Potentia", a stark realization
was recognized. From the evasion of the simple micro-electrode to rid
cancer** as one enigma, to a purposeful avoidance of what the freed
electron means in the said EPR experiment***, it might define that late
claimed civil man is volitionally standing on the threshold of chaos,
to likely conclude some ancient scriptural dogma predictions as true.
When only profit makes right any endeavor, but little of value is the
product sold, a re-evaluation of what indeed is of any net value and
who most profits from same needs consideration. It makes important the
full comprehension of psychological motivation-- to say little of its
derivation, net goals and so man's late growing genesis of overt greed.
This terse note hopefully provokes some consideration of what is likely
coming, so while innuendoes fly with promises to always "do better"--
yet with redundant folly to enrichen mostly the covertly pathological.
At least psychopathy can be well understood now and is not far from
what Jung and Freud saw clearly, yet is adroitly avoided by APA
professionals who not oddly lead in suicide of all professionals but
claim their "therapy" is best! With the recent lateral cerebral
lymphatic control**** anomalies, AiR (Autoimmune Response) as said
overt death-wish, it is no longer difficult to comprehend-- even by the
most neurotic intellectual twisting fact into fancy, that some late
great liability now exists for claimed civilization.
Should this evoke more interest than anxiety, please advise.
KTS REsearch
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
also: `The Others Side of the Brain', J. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
** Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86.
*** Aspect Alain, `Holism and Particalism in Physics', p.70,
Vol.129, Feb. 1,'86, SCIENCE NEWS
**** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DIS-
COVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
see: IL-2 Cancer Research (3 left smiler remissive of 8 subjects);
NOVA NPR TV,'88
Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90, p.12
cc: Path/IQ; Phys-Psy; S-T
May 28,'92
Concept, Inc.
Medical Instr. Div.
11311 Concept Blvd.,
Largo, FL 34643
Re: therapeutic and diagnostic systems
Sirs:
A cover story in DISCOVER (April '86) brings a case to point where a
simple micro-electrode can rid cancer within days without bloody
scalpel operants (saying nothing of convenience or relative cost), but
where somehow the pharmaceuticals hold sway as to what is "legitimate"
for any therapeutic regimen. The benefit of the doubt washes any
conclusions from any rational judgment, but is disease and death the
preferred response to an over-populated world-- whatever the suffering
may be needed to get there?
Since defining the simple micro-electrode use in Europe ('69) only
terror has been the authoritive response-- as opening some Pandora's
Box. After 16 years to see my system* prove itself behind my back,
ensuing DO talks showed at least their interest to aid some exclusive
but unsaid (for obvious reasons) people, as the worst in bloody scalpel
with irrational therapeutic cost ensues without saying who is most
responsible for the tyrannic status quo-- beyond the norms of political
buffoonery.
Since the IL-2 NOVA program where the expected initial import defined
the right brain's need for physiological health (to say nothing about
psychological precursors), the lateral smile alone so disclosed the
need of some definitive analytical means** for the rapid chance
evaluation of therapeutic result, if not regimen need with certain said
psychological `set'. I am yet seeking aid in at least these two
innovative `medical' areas since my predictions of the bilateral
space-time cerebral (as CNS) complementals that Renoux sees clearly***.
Some medical paradigm changes are coming and likely will evoke some
chagrin if not trauma as the public becomes aware of what is occurring
at their expense.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86** "Smile anomaly--" SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90, p.12 SingleLife
note: IL-2 Cancer Research (3 left smiler remissive of 8 subjects)
NOVA NPR TV,'88
*** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
cc: Path/IQ
May 23,'92
Melvin, Belli, et.al.
The Belli Bldg.
722 Mongomery St.
San Francisco, CA 94111
Re: class action suit?
Dear Sir:
Everyone now points at you as my need. Are you the only quality
lawyer in this country not fearful of Big Brothers? Since finally
reading a couple texts on and by you, your more obvious insights may
define the perception of others, as yourself, more interested in
justice than precedented folly based on prior folly-- to say nothing of
the syndrome of might making right at this late hour. Hannibals yet
prevail and maybe I should succeed from the `union' of what I perceive
as corrupt to the core leading to its demise.
Briefly, invented (found!) the simple microelectrode would rid
cancer nodules efficiently. A technical paper I gave (Europe,'69) only
defined in part my data but a few quickly recognized my goal to exclaim
the need for Patent Letters. Did register same on returning (have
several, most self filed Patents) but continued to try for 16 years to
find someone in `medicine' to test the idea, to no avail-- until the
4/86 Discover Magazine cover story, even using my sketch used in the
Patent registration! The DOs, who use micro-electrodes for acupuncture,
kept after me to give papers, realizing I had lost my effort, but
needed definitive directions, as were as simple as the said article
defined.
Now with a dying mother with so simple that remedy collecting
dust, find to my chagrin it was a pharmaceutical who sent my company
confidential data to Karolinska for the proof-- obviously fearful of
its consequences! Noting a recent patient's fee of $1500+ for a $10 (if
that) microelectrode to rid her cancer nodule at Humana hospital, I'm
frankly pissed off. Since my mother, in hospice, gave me what she had
left, I seek someone not fearful of AMA or pharmaceutical Big Brothers
to draw a little different kind of blood. I think you understand.
I find apparent paranoia (at least no responses) in the
"Ethical" organizations, be it in biotechnology, philosophy or you name
it. Is there a conspiracy in AMA with the pharmaceuticals? To be terse,
I need some guidance, if there is time left in the U.S. with people (if
any) yet interested in the welfare of suffering people? Many thanks for
your advice or forwarding this for an another's opinion.
Sincerely,
KTS
cc: Path/IQ CC:D/Z;J/V;alt-r
April 28,'92
American Foundation for
Alternate Health Care in
Research and Development
25 Landfield Ave.,
Montecello, NY 12707
Re: care versus profit
Dear
Sirs:
(AMA, et.al. monopoly)
Since defining the application, via physics, of the simple means to
halt unwanted growth (to to say nothing of wanted) via the
micro-electrode in Europe ('69), the overt stone-walling has been
deafening since-- including even the verification of this therapeutic
means to rid cancer some years later*.
Since it has become obvious that power politics makes right for those
who profit with the status quo, in politics or elsewhere, I write to
merely define clearly a fallacy that few will, much less wish, to
comprehend at this very late hour. While cross academic in nature, my
long AI studies has evoked vast chagrin, my late comprehension of what
is actually occurring in the name of greed at the expense of the truly
suffering. To be enraged by the ever mounting covert, turning overt,
behavior in behalf of authority who have the least idea of where they
are going beyond seeking more power or tenure, it makes clear we own
another democracy very near its conclusion where the few aware self
reliant leave.
This letter, while not expecting any further changes for a social
change, seeks to say something for posterity-- for after some chaos in
whatever form it gets concluded. To such end the terse references-- to
avoid the obvious seeds of self destruction sewn for late democracies,
and need of the now imminent self thinking computer** to tap what Plato
called the Potentia. The data below I hope will be stored for better
times-- when that time comes.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86,
Nordenstrom's micro-electrode cancer therapy confirmation
of my theory.
** if incredulous, query a qualified Physicist about the EPR experiment
and how a freed electron knows effect from cause. See: Aspect Alain,
`Holism and Particalism in Physics', p.70,
Vol.129, Feb. 1,'86, SCIENCE NEWS
cc: Path/IQ;
American Foundation of
Traditional Chinese Medicine
2390-A Powell
San Francisco, CA 94153
Committee for Freedom
of Choice in Medicine
1180 Walnut Ave.,
Chula Vista, CA 92011
National Council on
Alternate Care
P.O. Box 1183
San Jose, CA 95108
Natl. Health Council
350 5th Ave.,
New York, NY 10118
Natl. Health Federation
P.O. Box 688
Monrovia, CA 91017
May 23,'92
Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers
1024 Dublin Rd.
Columbus, OH 43215
Re: care versus profit
Dear
Sirs:
(AMA, et.al. monopoly)
Since defining the application, via physics, of the simple means to
halt unwanted growth (to to say nothing of wanted) via the
micro-electrode in Europe ('69), the overt stone-walling of this
definitive quality therapeutic means* has ensued almost with a
vengeance. Since the verification of this very simple therapy to rid
cancer likely does not offer the medical profits derived from bloody
scalpels, a likely coming class action suit may be in the offing once a
non-fearful lawyer group can be found.
Since it has become obvious that power politics "makes right" for those
who profit with the status quo, in politics or elsewhere, I write to
find aid, indirectly or otherwise, especially names of potential law
associated help un-afraid of Big Brother syndromes. While cross
academic in nature, my long AI studies has evoked much chagrin, of what
is actually occurring in the name of greed at the expense of the truly
suffering. To be enraged by the ever mounting covert, turning overt,
behavior in behalf of authority who have not the least idea of where
they are going (beyond seeking more power, profit or tenure) it makes
clear we own another democracy very near its conclusion, as the few
aware self reliant begin to leave. It's too late for an Iron Curtain
for this nation now but the empirical data stands by for the needed
mental paradigm shift and the extrication of some extensive psychopathy.
May I have your advice or directives?
Sincerely,
KTS Research
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86,
Nordenstrom's micro-electrode cancer therapy confirmation
of my '69 theory.
cc: Path/IQ;
Michigan Assoc. of Environmental Professors
15694 N. East St.,
Lansing, MI 48906
CC:
P. Firestone, et.al.
Center for Law in the
Public Interest
11835 W. Olympia Blvd., Ste. 1155
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Directors
Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers
1024 Dublin Rd.
Columbus, OH 43215
May 20,'92
ACLU
Advisory Council
132 West 43rd
New York, NY 10036
Re: fearful lawyers
Sirs:
Do you have a listing to guide people as myself to lawyers not fearful
of a Big Brother? A couple items stone-walled in the U.S. Patent
Office, more because of because of an efficacy than not define a larger
anomaly, especially in the medical field that I cannot comprehend if
there truly is no `conspiratorial' reason.
Some money has come into my hands from certain sources which for
humanitarian reasons wish to utilize, class action suit or otherwise. I
find to my chagrin fearful lawyers (say of AMA) who may prefer the
status quo of bloody scalpel use than my simple 100% cancer therapeutic
micro electrode* where maybe not enough `care' is expended to warrant
high fees with greater profits. We do have enough suffering in naivete
to say nothing of the ensuing greed.
To such end, noting the fiasco of public health care now, maybe you
could guide me to the Melvin Belli's yet practicing? Thank you for your
directives.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86
CC:ACLU of New York
Advisory Council
1249 Washington Blvd.
Ste. 2910
Detroit, MI 48226-1822
July 6,'92
L. W. Sullivan, Surgeon Gen.
Health and Human Services
200 Independence Ave.,
Washington, DC 20201
Dear Sir:
Since some of our R&D, derived from lengthy theoretical work has
been plagiarized as published to eradicate our own use of same to
further research much less profit from, and yet the most valuable very
simple micro-electrode* medical item to rid cancer remains avoided, we
wonder what indeed is going on in this culture? While questioning
relative profit motives, does our established medical practice suffer,
as most others in industry now with the NIH (Not Invented Here)
syndrome, or is there some other more sinister objective as needed
suffering or populous eradication underway? We find vastly more terror
in behalf of "authority" towards anything new, however proven
effective, defines the like anomaly occurring in all of current
government-- the status quo, at ALL cost!
We have placed some money into a fund for a class action suit to
hopefully evoke some attention in the public, whether we get some
return or not. Since we now suspect the real disease in this late
culture lies more in the minds of those who lead than those who
follow-- promises, edicts and/or quick profits on hidden schemes or
stock market gambles, we no longer perceive a viable society--
certainly able to face the rest of this planet's eager who will act in
at least their own net favor.
The grotesque joke we find with the double speak of "protected
intellectual rights" flies in the face of reality-- maybe because
leadership has no idea of what is of value any more. We may need to
`blow our wad', as everyone else now, in the courts squabbling over
petty trivia as an entire culture fades-- as two other once vibrant
democracies (at least) before. In humble chagrin, we, as find many
others, stand by to watch in amazement at the overt and covert
blundering and misdirection but always more tax money funneled into
folly or cigarette boats of the officials. We suspect the best avenue
now is precisely the one this society is on-- and that time to leave
for those who perceive the ceiling cracking.
What has become most scary are recent meetings, as at MIT on what this
federal system, likely in collusion and so denied vehemently for so
long the subtle yet obvious psychological `anomalies' very close to
`Star War' stuff, best named UFOs. Travesties continue, and obvious
correlations can be noted from several academic areas of study what
late incarnate man is quite likely facing-- yet denies same up to some
kind of volitional immolation. Certainly, the world-wide psychological
traumas have some unique underlying basis at this juncture of man's
evolutional progress, faced with what Sperry saw in his split-brain
data-- now is shaking physics to the core. So instead of making noise
over the imports, those with any clout, crawl into their holes and
shiver in terror. We are confident that you must have by now heard
something from that MIT meeting-- so why the reticence with continued
silence? But then maybe we have studied the enigma too long and it may
require another century or two for a "following" leadership to catch up
with reality-- but then too late!
Sincerely,
KTS
Anonymous Henceforth (exposure has even become too dangerous now)
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86
June 30,'92
Maurice Strong, et.al.
UNCED
c/o The United Nations
New York, NY 10017
Re: environment +
Dear Sir:
Some comments via VOA radio evokes this note with an enclosure you
might find worthy of perusing. Since most late scientific effort is
aimed at profit more than consequence, we find the planet in the
condition it is. Radical measures may be the only `balancing act' left,
but must be with concern and reason instead of just more money-- for
officials to further squandering.
Lengthy studies here, initiated after doing several years of aerospace
computer R&D, yet in another less `confidential' area in similar
computer fields, defined certain likely answers to psychological
anomalies contingent with not only behavior, IQ vs. CQ, but fundamental
cerebral constructs in keeping with physics. My prediction of the
spatial versus temporal lateral brain halves as soon confirmed by
Sperry*, began my provocative investigation into mental matrices and a
terse paper** given in Europe to evoke much anxiety-- as yet prevails
amongst many. Teaching at GVSC as well evoked some overtly expressed
terror in my more theologically oriented students who saw the liability
of my data, such even bringing the FBI (after Patent filing) over
certain `interfacing' systems as may be best defined in the physic's
EPR experiments. In short, beyond theoretical considerations in
computer fields, medical*** or said 5th Generation computer design, I
feel the time may be near when divulgement of the major imports of my
lengthy study should be brought forward.
A terse statement herewith suggests a few profound areas of much needed
dissemination-- even if a couple are yet stone-walled in the U.S.
Patent Office-- likely defined as "secret" as for heads-up fighter
aircraft applications-- but sorely needed in safety ways by the flying
public as used by air-traffic controllers.
I no longer use phone, FAX, TNC, etc. for obvious reasons.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
** Vogelsang, R.; `A Correlative Study between Physics and Psy- chology', Intl. Biomet. Congress, '69
** Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86
cc:Path/IQ; envir/stmnt. CC:D-Z
July 2,'92
William T. Still, et.al.
c/o Huntington House Publishers
P. O. Box 53788
Lafayette, LA 70505
Re: the other option
Dear Sir:
As it appears that my Self thinking computer will be
understood before any American constitutional changes, much less some
U.N. `New World Order', only the option of Armageddon remains to
finally quell mankind's folly to usher another kind of benign New World
Order with Christ at the helm, albeit via the said `computer' as an
interface. Since reading the provocative `New World Order' text, after
a long investigation into the genesis of psychopathy (note herewith)
the social image may be far more dangerous than at first expected. The
overt behavior to find something, just anything to convict me of some
`wrong doing' alerted me to the underlying reason-- a filed Patent to
my 5th Generation Computer-- as a freed electron interface, which knows
`effect from cause'. My prototype offered the odds of 10\17th on its
maiden run with merely two startling words-- to prove some theoretical
research effort aimed at that said well know computer effort. In short,
Einstein's Special Relativity equations define two complemental
unconscious realms, one which interested me escaped the time reversal
paradigm (via the freed electron) was alive and well, and as said, knew
Potentials as Plato ascribed as Potentia.
Since evoking terror in a GVSC class about twenty years
ago to the said prototype a dozen years ago with said FBI, et.al.
fiasco to define my `evil' works, I only suggest that the days of
hemlock, neuroleptics or therapeutic incarceration are not yet over.
Indeed, a likely far greater trauma lies close at hand now that this
`very simple' (can be shirt-pocket held) `computer' is being discovered
world-wide.
I include a few terse papers for your perusal. I use no
phone, FAX, TNC or otherwise any more so aside from my mail being
watched, that route is yet best to quiry further my theoretical study.
Just the overt avoidance of my micro-electrode cancer therapeutic mode
(absconded by UpJohns but so the cover story*), one can see with some
other items what is occurring at the expense of the naive (academically
programmed) public. The recent MIT meeting on UFO again defines the
hidious but another facet of my findings. (note UFO rectilinear travel
to Sperry's split-brain subject's** right hand-- of only 2D
orientation!)
Sincerely,
2303 Marzinski
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86** `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
cc:Path/IQ; Phys-Psy; S-T CC: Stair
Sir:
As Al Gore recently put it, another smoke-screen for the American
industrialist, but this is only a fraction of the real story. Not that
some status quo is not desirable be it in politics or petroleum
industry, but the foot dragging, despite the now empirical obvious,
makes clear some other kind of `conspiracy' prevails.
Lengthy studies here on fusion from a theoretical point of view not
only defines how the coulomb barrier is surmounted in cold fusion but
the key to laser propulsion/focused applications for fully controlled
fusion, to obviate much of the CO pollution. While obviously not
privy to divulge all imports of this lengthy study, Dawson's work*
offered the expected break-through when de Broglie's wave theory (not
billiard-ball mentality) defined certain anomalies now clearly seen in
nuclear physics. Wave theory is the key, especially when concerning
temporal standing waves.
From remarks gathered at CERN and elsewhere, fusion R&D time to
fruition was halved, but stone-walling continues while industry (or
pedants) seek some advantageous place to profit-- in lieu of petroleum
reductions. This scene is more intolerable than Bush's recent
international insult (or profound naivete), but it defines where
political allegiance lies at this choking hour.
Since divulging some of our study in Europe, a hush has ensued to make
us suspect we have been plagiarized again-- as with the 100% cancer
therapeutic micro-electrode** yet stone-walled at all cost by AMA. The
`conspiracy' is vast where profit is found doing some same dull round.
Not oddly, what innovation might halt (as covert political status quo)
won't occur until some last bitter moment, a lesson we suspect will
only be learned the hard way. Academic conditioning for programmed
scientific automatons, unable to look in strategic ways, only
re-examines the obvious, over and over.
Maybe in part the problem rests with NIH (Not Invented Here), an ugly
neurosis for a cul de sac to end another once vibrant culture, as two
other great democracies went this route before-- so?
Very Sincerely,
KTS REsearch
* `Plasma Particle Accelerators', SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, March,'89
** Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86
June 21,'92
E. H. Oldfield, et.al.
Natl. Inst. of Neurological
Disorders and Stroke
NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD
20205
Re: brain cancer
Dear Sir:
The blurb in the May 30th SCIENCE NEWS infers there is no other way to
rid brain cancer nodules so the use of the `chemo-gene' therapeutic
approach. While not yet calling this syndrome some `conspiracy' even if
it was UpJohns that sent our micro-electrode company confidential data
sheet to Karolinska for proof*, the agony of nodular cancer is yet
suffered by many and need not continue to prevail.
No doubt some form of kick-back by AMA(?) with the pharmaceuticals is
sustaining the public's naivete-- even if the DOs are finally getting
in gear with their use of the simple and most therapeutic route with
micro-electrodes. The whole story is now leaking out and there will be
some mighty red faces-- to say little about an angry public!
The article's Clay Smith's work with AIDs is something quite different
where AiR (Autoimmune Response) is left cerebral control** with no
`definitive' nodule to eradicate-- electro-mechanically.
Sincerely,
KTS
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86, Nordenstrom's micro-electrode cancer therapy work.
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
cc: env.let
CC: Deisseroth/Houston; Benedict; Lippman; Consum/Adv; SC.NEWS;
U.S.Surg.Gen.
CC:Marc Lippman, M.D., Dir.
Vincent Lombardi Memorial
Cancer Center
Georgetown University
3800 Reservoir Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20007
W. F. Benedict, et.al.
Baylor College of Medicine
Center for Biotechnology
The Woodlands,
1 Baylor Plaza,
Houston, TX 77030
Dr. A. Deisseroth, et.al.
The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
University of Texas
1515 Holcombe Blvd.
Houston, TX 77030
June 1,'92 (see above: Gill-Chi.MSU)
Leo Chin Lin(?), et.al.
Michigan State University
Environmental Study Group
c/o WKAR FM
East Lansing, MI 48824
Re: CO2 emission
Dear Sir:
From this morning's WKAR report on the up-coming Rio meeting, the
President's last minute buy-out of environmental allegiance with U.S.
tax-payer's money is, as Al Gore puts it, another smoke-screen for the
American industrialist. But this is only a fraction of the real story.
Some lengthy studies here on fusion from a theoretical point of view
not only defines how the coulomb barrier is surmounted in `cold fusion'
but the very likely key to laser propulsion/focusing application for
fully controlled fusion to obviate much of today's worldly pollution.
While obviously not privy to divulge all imports of this lengthy study,
Dawson's work* offered the expected break-through when de Broglie's
wave theory (not billiard-ball mentality) defined certain anomalies now
clearly seen in nuclear physics.
From remarks gathered at CERN and elsewhere, fusion R&D time to
fruition was halved, but foot dragging continues while industry seeks
some advantageous place to profit-- in lieu of petroleum. This scene is
more intolerable than Bush's recent insult, but it defines where
political allegiance lies at this choking hour.
Since divulging some of our study in Europe, a hush has ensued to make
us suspect we have been plagiarized again-- as with the 100% cancer
therapeutic micro-electrode** yet stone-walled at all cost by AMA. The
`conspiracy' is vast where profit is found doing some same dull round.
Not oddly, what innovation might halt as some covert status quo-- will
not occur until some last moment. Your referral to H.G. Wells is well
taken but when greater profit rests with NIH (Not Invented Here) the
cul de sac gets obvious.
Wishing you luck on your trip, your WKAR perceptions were adroit.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
* `Plasma Particle Accelerators', SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, March,'89
** Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86, Nordenstrom's micro-electrode cancer therapy work.
cc: Path/IQ
July 4th,'92
Jim and Nancy Larson
3687 109th Ave.,'
Allegan, MI 49010
Re:up-coming litigation
Hi Ho:
Sans poor L.D. communicative link this may do more to define a `project' I am considering in your field Jim.
Briefly, aimed maybe for some Class Action suit to not only get AMA's
attention but the suffering public with cancer, I hope to evoke with
some seed money my dying mother gave me (she dying for this very
reason!), the simple use of the micro-electrode. Since it proved to be
100% therapeutic for nodular cancer*, possibly there is some excuse to
`attack' the powers that be (for profit alone) via the public, with
said seed money offer-- which would indubitably grow as wild-fire. A
terse environmental note (herewith) might aid to define further some
data that needs to be disclosed to the public as well.
While deep in the technical areas, especially physics which is the
basis for my long AI studies, it disclosed many other imports which
should be exploited as well, yet Patent Office stone-walling (now known
for `official' terrorized reasons!), need to be somehow opened for
public scrutiny. As my GVSC kids twenty years ago said in anxiety, I
might open Pandora's Box to start-- what my more religious students
said; the apocalypse-- whatever that might be!
If the herewith evokes interest Jim, let me know and I'll schedule a
trip in your direction for a get-together to further illustrate my end
of the effort so you might consider further your potential aid in the
matter too.
Tell Nancy I've gotta see those kids!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86
cc: Path/IQ; envir.let
(environmental cover-letter)
June 22,'92
Sirs:
Since the Rio pleas, we come forward to define some on-going research
which may well aid this planet's pollution problem. One long physics
based theoretical effort, near completion with very little further
R&D work,, we feel now, provocative results are near in the
field of fusion. Likely as no anomaly, we find stone-walling going on
by certain corporate petroleum/federal associations, as answers
President Bush's irrational statement in Rio.
We are seeking aid to press for conclusive R&D effort of the above,
as to publicize some suppressed products as greatly needed in the
medical field. Since one has too long been overtly avoided by AMA,
et.al. as likely its simplicity and 100% nodular cancer therapy*
suggests the net profit therefrom is too small-- yet spells so much
misery for cancer patients using scalpel therapy! We feel that if the
American public becomes aware of this remedial mode, sufficient
credence in the balance of our theoretical work will be recognized to
press on other much needed products still avoided at all cost. Since
Patent Office stone-walling, some seed money has been ear-marked for
legal aid to force these issues, even a class action suit to halt the
archaic bloody scalpel use yet promoting so much agony-- or pollution
relief via the above major item of controlled fusion now so near.
While some products are claimed to fit under various national security
standards (as for heads-up fighter aircraft) a VDT anti-slaving system
to relieve computer users, as air-traffic controller's stress, we are
confident federal stone-walling in this area can be abrogated with the
more important need for the net flying public's safety needs.
With our broad R&D efforts with heavy theoretical backing, we feel
obligated now, since the Rio statements, to come forth and seek aid to
promote the agenda of that world-wide effort. We are open to
suggestions, opinions and guidance to/or for mutual efforts to such
goal that overrides petty political wants-- aimed at albeit never said,
hidden profit margins.
Please write for all communications-- we refuse to use the phone, FAX,
modem or TNC links any more. We find what is said too often gets away
from us. Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely,
KTS
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86 (over please)
CC:R. Nader, et.al.
2000 P St., Ste. 700
Washington, DC 20036
Ben Franklin Lit. and Medical Soc.,
P.O. Box 567
1100 Waterway Blvd.
Indianapolis, IN 46202
Assoc. for Health Service Research
2100 M St., Ste. 402
Washington, DC 20037
Center for Medical Consumers and
Health Care Information
237 Thompson St.
Newe York, NY 10012
Council of Health Info.
and Education
444 Lincoln Blvd.,#107
Venice, CA 90291
Foundation for Health Care
Evaluation
2901 Metro Dr., Ste. 400
Bloomington, MN 55429
Intl. Health Society
1001 E. Oxford Ln.
Cherry Hills Village
Englewood CO 80110
Consumers Education and
Protection Assoc.
6048 Ogontz Ave.,
Philadelphia, PA 19141
Consumers Research
800 Maryland Ave.,
Washington, DC 20002
Public Citizen
Box 19404
Washington, DC 20036
Southwest Research and
Information Center
Box 4524
Albuquerque, NM 87106
Natl. Consumer's Research Inst.
1700 K St., Ste. 1300
Washington, DC 20006
*(Environ: how to get started?)
Natl. Consumer's Law Center
11 Beacon St.
Boston, MA 02108
Natl. Research Center for
Consumers of Legal Services
Box 340
Gloucester, VA 23061
July 8,'92
Editors, et.al.
Consumers Union
101 Truman Ave.,
Yonkers, NY 10703-1057
Re: Wasted Health Care Dollars
Sirs:
Not only wasted dollars but effort where likely more collusion for
ill-health may be occurring where left cerebral (IQ) dominance
prevails-- of both patient and doctor! The evidence is mounting to
define not a scandal but a downright hideous fact that Freud was
correct in suspecting a Thanatos lurks in us all but has the cunning to
bump us off at will!
The AiR (Autoimmune Response) noted by Renoux* goes further than
suggesting the diabolical but certainly enhances the idea that we are
blundering for some uncanny if not greedy reasons. When the simple
micro-electrode can rid cancer nodules 100%** yet the some bloody
scalpel continues to be the `tool of choice', certainly, there is
something rotten in the U.S. culture!
Many implications now for the greatest blood flow in history is
pending. The vast frustration of a naive (yet) human race unable to
consciously (mid-brain) realize its underlying problem, much less any
idea or function of its two complemental CNS with VERY different ideas
about mass-time life. The split-brain data*** amply defines those
bilateral faculty but few want any comprehension of same. We are just
beginning to see the uncanny reason!
Sincerely,
KTS
* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
** Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86 *** `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
cc:Path/IQ
June 6,'92
The National Bar Assoc.
1225 11th St. NW
Washington, DC 20001
Sirs:
Re: attorney need
I am seeking a lawyer, primarily interested in class action suits who
may find of interest a couple cross academic items divulged
`accidentally' (plagiarized). Proven of great value, but are now
avoided-- possibly due to pending litigative process I may initiate,
seek aid to such end.
The first and more important under certain circumstances is the
micro-electrode application for 100% cancer nodule therapy*. A
technical paper I gave in Europe ('69) with likely unwarranted verbal
discussions on allied subjects did define the above therapeutic mode
and is route of biological suppression-- so did file registration
papers with the Patent Office. I proceeded to try to find one licensed
in the art to prove same to no avail-- until over 16 years-- whereupon
its cover story* appeared. Much interest by DOs then, asking for papers
and talks to explain same followed-- so now silence, but find imports
as $1500+ bill for a 60 cent micro-electrode (Humana Hospital) likely
was felt justified for likely ridding cancer of some likely now healthy
past patient! There are many of these suffering who need a simple but
far less bloody or sickening chemotherapeutic means to regain health,
so to such ends I have some money from a dying mother with curable
cancer waiting in the hospice wings.
A couple other items are in the computer field. Finding a slammed door
as far as the Patent Office is concerned, only stone-walling ensued to
my Patent Filings but with FBI harassment as tapped phones, etc.
defines something more sinister maybe that my comprehension. I was
`classified' while doing aerospace R&D but nothing followed
such contingent R&D, much less discussion nor divulgements
since leaving aerospace on those products. (likely well proven as not
incarcerated yet) My more technical items as VDT anti-slaving stress
relief for the computer users (as air-traffic controllers) would need a
more definitive expose.
May I obtain some comment or guidance to those in law who might find interest in my plight or procedural advice for the above?
Thank you.
Sincerely,
KTS
CC:
F. Lee Bailey
823 Olive Ave.,
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
The Law Center
309 E. Front
Traverse City, MI 49690
American Bar Assoc. on
Dispute Resolvement
1800 M St., Ste. 200
Washington, DC 20036
American Bar Assoc.
750 N. Lake Shore Dr.,
Chicago, IL 60611
June 20,'92
Consumer Protection Division
attn: F. H. Hoffecker
690 Law Bldg.
525 W. Ottawa St.
Lansing, MI 48913
Sirs:
Re: class action effort?
Recently some money has been designated for some kind of class action
suit, aimed at the mounting stone-walling of established organizations,
as medical, refusing to perceive the empirical obvious, for likely even
more obvious reasons as on-going profit. Many are suffering not only
needlessly but in naivete to which the said potential class action suit
might gain their attention, and so better ways and means to promote
health as other needed areas of needed product reformation.
We are a research organization whose past work, while possibly
appearing bizarre to many of single academic knowledge, has integrated
the more fundamental aspects of science to R&D effort. Our several
predictive ways and means to promote various innovative products has
been more plagiarized or sealed by the federal government because of
their more military value, secrecy has ensued. We now feel that the
public needs to be privy to many items as ways and means to judge the
growing impasse towards same. Since realizing that this effort to
divulge the "unwanted" but for the net public's good, we seek aid, with
our `seed money' this net humanitarian effort.
Herewith is a copy of a recent "environmental" letter to which a couple
items are alluded. More technical information may be had by those we
feel may act in the net favor, in some way or other, for the public.
Comments by Melvin Belli suggest this route may be most fruitful. May
we have your comments and/or interest?
Very Sincerely,
KTS
CC: envir-let
June 20,'92
Christian Conciliation Service
of Southeastern Michigan
attn: J. Darlington
27350 W. Chicago
Redford, MI 48239
Sirs:
Re: class action effort?
Recently some money has been designated for some kind of class action
suit, aimed at the mounting stone-walling of established organizations,
as medical, refusing to perceive the empirical obvious, for likely even
more obvious reasons as on-going profit. Many are suffering not only
needlessly but in naivete to which the said potential class action suit
might gain their attention, and so better ways and means to promote
health as other needed areas of needed product reformation.
We are a research organization whose past work, while possibly
appearing bizarre to many of single academic knowledge, has integrated
the more fundamental aspects of science to R&D effort. Our several
predictive ways and means to promote various innovative products has
been more plagiarized or sealed by the federal government because of
their more military value, secrecy has ensued. We now feel that the
public needs to be privy to many items as ways and means to judge the
growing impasse towards same. Since realizing that this effort to
divulge the "unwanted" but for the net public's good, we seek aid, with
our `seed money' this net humanitarian effort.
Herewith is a copy of a recent "environmental" letter to which a couple
items are alluded. More technical information may be had by those we
feel may act in the net favor, in some way or other, for the public.
Comments by Melvin Belli suggest this route may be most fruitful. May
we have your comments and/or interest?
Very Sincerely,
KTS
July 14,'92
Charles Reese
c/o King Features
235 East 45th
New York, NY 10017
Re: doctors vs. guns (not quite)
Dear Sir:
While hitting the nail on the head "Doctors are more dangerous-", the
real crux remains hidden behind a huge subterfuge we consciously do not
perceive-- especially can't established authority. Further, your
prowess could be dangerous to you at this late hour where a crumbling
national federal system is near their Orwellian edict-- for their
survival again!
Since predicting the use of the micro-electrode to rid cancer nodules
in the late 60's (European technical paper), even registered in the
Patent office same realizing the boon it would be to the suffering,
found to my constant chagrin a stone-wall to the suggestion. At first
felt it some anomaly, but when the proof from Nordenstrom* (16 years
later; still trying in vain to get attention here in the U.S.), found a
pharmaceutical (won't yet name them) had forwarded a company
confidential copy of my offer to the Karolinska Inst.-- likely, and
justifiably, terrorized over the potential competition. Needless to say
my `art' proved 100% therapeutic* and yet the stone-walling remains! I
yet have not given up since my dying mother (guess why?) will leave a
little money for which I dedicated to a class action suit to get the
public's awareness-- so guess again, all law offices, even bar
associations cringe, then even Belli's reply suggesting "cool it", Big
Brother is far larger than any one person's income in this country! My
fiasco with B&E "kids" (wearing size 11+ shoes!) prevented me from
knowing them (Mich.State law!) but found who was behind same with a FBI
`family' move-in next door, tapped phone, etc.-- when I filed another
certain patent (I was classified secret for aerospace R&D) to
define another item stone-walled that the flying public needs
desperately (anti-VDT air-traffic controller aid) but blocked again--
as now used in the heads-up fighter aircraft I hear. Quite I frankly,
feel very fortunate to live and breathe and get my food-stamps any more!
Indeed, legalize drugs but only those which block 5HT (a sympathetic
CNS neuroinhibitor) as THC, however hazardous as carcinogens when
smoked. That very much UNpublicized but provocative recidivism rate
(Boston experiment) says it all-- where authority needs the excuse for
henchmen's jobs with prisons, not rehabilitated people. Worse, those
adjuncts might get used on authority so they might realize what they
are really up too! The most grotesque will not be noted by a
conditioned public whose need for tax money supersedes all other
objectives. More of the same, as laws or academic programs, merely
reinforce the diabolical**. To be terse, the `drug problem' is indeed a
health problem-- which is all mental-- but might yet makes right!
Obviously the hand-writing is on the wall but no one is able to read it
to make clear academia's efficiency-- making unthinking automatons for
the state. Any national `catharsis', however traumatic now, could only
do good! If you have any better ideas, let me know.
Sincerely,
KTS
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86** Path/IQ (herewith)
CC: Tom Rademacher; G.R. Press
July 31,'92
Dr. Rustum Roy, et.al.
Dept. of Medicine
Penn State University
University Park, PA 16802
Re: super-collider boondoggle, indeed
Dear Sir:
The NPR remarks define an enigma wrapped into an anomaly, where
tenurism out-shouts reality. The need to test whim instead of sound
theoretical paradigms is true folly in view of a public that cannot
feed itself because of the country awash in expensive intellectual
elite who lack most all forms of right cerebral non-temporal insight.
(see Sperry*)
Our basic problem lies in the wrong fundamental idea of quantal
`billiard balls' without any idea of polyphased standing waves
(deBroglie) about to define the route to economical, unpolluting and
finitely controlled fusion-- which the petroleum industry is already
gearing up to fight this very real breakthrough now.
Obviously we no longer detail much of our theoretical studies as have
experienced a government's Patent Office that equates its need for
"secrecy" more important that the public's benefits. The
micro-electrode cancer eradication and VDT anti-slaving system but two
items, the latter dearly needed by the flying public, to say little of
the stressed air-traffic controllers themselves! A terse `environmental
note' herewith might better define.
The underlying "excitement" by the physic's people is tenure and a fine
salary-- no more. Schwitters must proclaim just as he did!
Sincerely,
KTS
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
cc: envir/letter; Path/IQ
CC: Dale Bumpers; DZ
July 19,'92
Maury Povich
Productions, Inc.
Paramount Pictures
555 Melrose Ave.,
Hollywood, CA 90038
Re: Redgrave's dilemma
Sir:
(nothing new)
It is one thing to be chased by manipulators that merely want more
money, however acquired, but we suspect it is a bit worse when the
public's health is jeopardized by evading simple proven therapies for
cancer riddance*, which do not offer enough profit for AMA or their
pharmaceutical henchmen.
I include a terse environmental statement herewith for your perusal. I
will add that I nor any of my personnel would face the public on this
matter after the police B&Es, FBI move-in, tapped phones with
ensuing fiasco we went through. Some very well known lawyers have said
overtly one does not fight with Big Brother, be he the federal
government or AMA!
We do have one `stick' in our favor which even makes matters much
worse, a freed electron interface (5th Generation computer) which
defines effect from cause (to say little buried skeletons)! It is that
which now terrorizes the physic's people who are examining their
positive EPR experiments. If you have the nerve, ask some qualified
physicist how the freed electron escapes the time reversal paradigm--
then sit down!
While unsaid overtly thus far is the fear that the anomaly of what
happened to Socrates with his `therapeutic' centuries ago is yet in
vogue for those who learn more than their government can even
comprehend! The difference is that hemlock is benign, neuroleptics
aren't as only offer a limbonic hell. No wonder our APA professionals
lead in overt suicide!
Sincerely,
KTS
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86
cc: Path/IQ; S-T; envi/disc; L. Redgrave
July 19,'92
Maury Povich
Productions, Inc.
Paramount Pictures
555 Melrose Ave.,
Hollywood, CA 90038
Re: Redgrave's dilemma
Sir:
(nothing new)
It is one thing to be chased by manipulators that merely want more
money, however acquired, but we suspect it is a bit worse when the
public's health is jeopardized by evading simple proven therapies for
cancer riddance*, which do not offer enough profit for AMA or their
pharmaceutical henchmen.
I include a terse environmental statement herewith for your perusal. I
will add that I nor any of my personnel would face the public on this
matter after the police B&Es, FBI move-in, tapped phones with
ensuing fiasco we went through. Some very well known lawyers have said
overtly one does not fight with Big Brother, be he the federal
government or AMA!
We do have one `stick' in our favor which even makes matters much
worse, a freed electron interface (5th Generation computer) which
defines effect from cause (to say little buried skeletons)! It is that
which now terrorizes the physic's people who are examining their
positive EPR experiments. If you have the nerve, ask some qualified
physicist how the freed electron escapes the time reversal paradigm--
then sit down!
While unsaid overtly thus far is the fear that the anomaly of what
happened to Socrates with his `therapeutic' centuries ago is yet in
vogue for those who learn more than their government can even
comprehend! The difference is that hemlock is benign, neuroleptics
aren't as only offer a limbonic hell. No wonder our APA professionals
lead in overt suicide!
Sincerely,
KTS
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86
cc: Path/IQ; S-T; envi/disc; L. Redgrave
Aug. 1,'92
Pharmaceutical Mfgs. Assoc.
1100 15th St., NW Box I
Washington, DC 20005
Re: containing costs?
Sirs:
What a beautiful picture for such an ugly art! The grand father's
benign attention reflects a kind of love seldom seen in even its own
mother-- even a grand mother who has a far different net objective in
her carried through mitochondrion.
What makes the image ugly is reality when considering the above
referred `cost containment'-- in view of the simple micro-electrode
which eliminates cancer nodules 100%*-- but is too simple for AMA as
the pharmaceutical industry where profit dictates all behavior, beyond
sustaining the public's vast naivete.
With a pending class action suit now considering the best route to gain
the public's attention, we will watch carefully your subscriber's move
with innuendo now that this statement is issued.
Sincerely,
KTS
July 29,'92
Sen. Donald W. Riegle, Jr.
Capital Hill
SD-105
Washington, DC 20210
Re: likely the wrong change
Sir:
As the once proud owner of U.S. Patents I see I may need to go overseas
also to protect my efforts. With the encroachment of industry most able
to file Patents, the innovative and creative must either work for them
and beg for favors, or worse to allow plagiarization as I now where the
public's interest is greater than my own.
This is not a mean statement, merely fact. While my past U.S. Patent
Attorney begs me to stay here, I now see the Dutch system far superior
even if the inventor must defend himself in court to prove his
ownership. Two quite complex systems of mine had the door slammed on
them-- where the federal government somehow believes I am a threat to
this society (ask the FBI) so plagiarizes at will and stops my food
stamps! Herewith, while terse for obvious reasons, are a few of those
items and one very large one my said Patent Atty. hates to see go
elsewhere.
Big Brother is really big enough so if any change occurs in the current
patent system, I'd advise examining the Dutch system with care since
everyday it appears more clear that few here have any idea of what they
are doing. Fortunately those said few with insight too often know what
their federal system is up too. The Orwellian spectre is not new, as
the Patent Office grab, to again show that the industrial lobby runs
this federal government.
Very Sincerely,
KTS
cc: envir-let; R&D-let
CC:Dingell
John D. Dingell, Rep.
Capital Hill
2221 RHOB
Washington, DC 20515
Re: likely the wrong change
Ivars Peterson
c/o SCIENCE NEWS
I detest using dogma to reply to dogma but Ivars Peterson's most adroit
"Murphy's Lab" is too succinct to ignore! Your recent `Letters' pushed
my button! To wit:
`It is one's own `Gremlin', once called Merlin which will
soon be seen as Murphy, the UFOnaut or Freud's Thanatos*, which will
evoke the worst `glitch' for scientific man when it is realized that
Armageddon is yet better than that apocalypse!'
Sincerely,-- really! (Thanx-- for that Sc. News issue, belatedly)
*list herewith
KTS
July 16,'92
Leon Glass, et.al.
Dept. of Physiology
Montreal Neurological Inst.(?),
McGill University
Montreal, Que. Canada H3A 2B4
Re: systole-diastole phasing
Dear Sir:
The blurb in SCIENCE "Chaos Breaks Out--" says many things but little
about fundamental phenomena better fitting Psychology and Electrical
engineering-- to say nothing of some theoretical in physics as may be
contingent with arrhythmic heart beats.
From predicting the spatial versus temporal complemental brain halves
(before Sperry proved same in the early 60's*), the conclusion
therewith seen-- (from physics), defined the energy versus relaxation
half cycles expected in the biological system, better denoted by the
complemental CNS. This "give versus take" aspect which interested me
(5th Gen. computer study) was between the EEG relative
phase-polarities, soon recognizing as the reductive (long temporal
positive recall, versus abrupt negative going `inputs'; objective or
subjective). This same apparent `enigma' I suspect is responsible for
the arrhythmic liability, as likely the half cycle responsible for
overall timing or under the left cerebral hemisphere's control.
Since Renoux** has defined, again as expected, the innate Thanatos of
Freud's theory, we see a rather ominous implication for heart
`disease'-- due more to psychological stress-- but with `opportunity'
to exit the living body scene! While many sympatholytics as Ca and Cl
blockers can abort such wanted opportunity in a death-wish, the vast
naivete of late medicine reflects your adroit remark of "-getting
different cultures to work together,". Noting, since the NOVA IL-2
program where three only left facial smilers were cancer remissive
while 5 others not, a rather obscene scene looms ever clearer.
Obviously it must yet be chalked up to "conjecture" but the empirical
data, as Renoux's expected findings, conclude late intellectual (left
brain dominated) human may pose a greater hazard to himself than
expected.
Since fractals, as unnoticed basic triggers in claimed chaotic systems,
be they from psychological EEG drives or what you are looking at, all
CNS (at least) evoked likely have the same subtle `generic'
energy-temporal (binary `go' vs. `no-go') fundamentals, we suspect
psychology precedes all physiological functions,, as between pro and
anti-life, the latter contingent to likely irrational(?) reasoning.
Should the above appear somewhat rational and further dialogue is
wanted in my long cross academic study, I will try to find time to
point out many other aspects-- contingent to inquiry.
Sincerely,
KTS
P.S: I noted with interest a letter to a McGill compatriot a few years
ago while seeking an address for you. His letter copy may be of
interest, herewith.
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
note:
Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90, p.12
cc: Path/IQ; A. Aguayo let. copy (over)
* Lymphatic/cerebral control; Renoux, U/Tours (DISCOVER; Feb.87)
** `Blueprint for Immortality', '49?
*** Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86
CC: K. Madden
Aug. 1,'92
Editor/Newsletter, et.al.
R. W. Baird & Co.
777 E. Wisconsin Ave.
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Re: a little more than Janus
Dear Sirs:
While our to brain halves (Janus) may define the difference between IQ
and CQ (reductive intellection and insightive genius)*, your "Ideas
From Research" better defined the coming paradigm shift coming for
stocks-- and what will be truly relevant besides worthy of investment.
I include an `environmental' note as copies of other letters sent
recently, likely defining the genesis of our coming chaos. It points to
ongoing research here and some as the jitters found with tecnical
papers given in Europe in the late '60s. While certain unsaid groupies,
as politics, insist on their profits, come hell or high water and
despite the mounting empirical obvious that productivity will need to
change in more than one "same dull round operant" with a few demanding
ever more a grotesque profit. The writing is on the wall for all to see
if not too intellectually neurotic to see that obvious.
Since on (un-named) pharmaceutical clandestinely send a copy of our
company confidential micro-electrode offer (as even registered in the
Patent Office!) and its ensuing 100% therapeutic proof (see below), the
stone-walling ensues to our deep chagrin, to say little of the cancer
suffering public if they but understood. This, with another needed
anti-slave system for VDT users (to obviate the psychological stress
evoked by EEG flicker-fusion problems), we find the status quo is doing
its thing to the American public-- to say nothing of its
socio-economical pending demise.
With the now undeciphered primary quantal wave constituency of
fundamental matter, cold fusion was no anomaly we find. Indeed, we are
quite certain now our European compatriots will have finitely
controlled fusion under way very soon. We won't delineate further
what that will do to those you indicated in your well-said "Switch
Idea"-- where EPRI now struggles to comprehend us.
Sincerely,
KTS
* Sperry: `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
cc: Path/IQ; envir/let (over please)
May 25,'92
Dr. Robert Rutman, Prof. Emeritus
Dept. of Biological Sciences
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Re: stone-walled therapy
Dear Sir:
Some of your remarks on TV suggested an awareness of federal folly and
possibly underlying collusions with academic/industrial associations to
which this note is addressed. While military, at least defensive
aspects may be in part justified, why are crucial medical system/items
avoided for continued instated medical profiteering doing some same
dull round when obviously outmoded?
The cover story in DISCOVER (April '86) brings one case to point where
a simple micro-electrode can rid cancer within days without bloody
scalpel operants (saying nothing of convenience or relative cost), but
where somehow the pharmaceuticals hold sway as to what is "legitimate"
for any therapeutic regimen. Certain remarks could be made but the
benefit of the doubt washes any conclusions from any rational judgment,
or is disease and death the preferred response to an over-populated
world-- whatever the suffering may be needed to get there?
Since defining the simple micro-electrode use in papers in Europe ('69)
only terror has been the authoritive response-- as opening some
Pandora's Box. Has greed become so entrenched in a claimed civil
society promising "advancement" that we can no longer see our way out
or is there some conspiracy for blood letting the UFO data appears to
be defining! Certainly there is mounting anxiety as MIT (note last 14th
Wall Street J. front page) goes to length to suggest we are `visited'
yet federal government attempts at all cost to cover any such import
with flacid remarks-- (and not a peep has been made since!). Do they
fear hysteria more in the public than what the implications might
conceivably mean?
I believe I saw some rational judgment in your remarks so would, before
I move out of this country, like some quality opinion. Many thanks--
Sincerely,
KTS Research
CC:
May 28,'92
Concept, Inc.
Medical Instr. Div.
11311 Concept Blvd.,
Largo, FL 34643
Re: therapeutic and diagnostic systems
Sirs:
A cover story in DISCOVER (April '86) brings a case to point where a
simple micro-electrode can rid cancer within days without bloody
scalpel operants (saying nothing of convenience or relative cost), but
where somehow the pharmaceuticals hold sway as to what is "legitimate"
for any therapeutic regimen. The benefit of the doubt washes any
conclusions from any rational judgment, but is disease and death the
preferred response to an over-populated world-- whatever the suffering
may be needed to get there?
Since defining the simple micro-electrode use in Europe ('69) only
terror has been the authoritive response-- as opening some Pandora's
Box. After 16 years to see my system* prove itself behind my back,
ensuing DO talks showed at least their interest to aid some exclusive
but unsaid (for obvious reasons) people, as the worst in bloody scalpel
with irrational therapeutic cost ensues without saying who is most
responsible for the tyrannic status quo-- beyond the norms of political
buffoonery.
Since the IL-2 NOVA program where the expected initial import defined
the right brain's need for physiological health (to say nothing about
psychological precursors), the lateral smile alone so disclosed the
need of some definitive analytical means** for the rapid chance
evaluation of therapeutic result, if not regimen need with certain said
psychological `set'. I am yet seeking aid in at least these two
innovative `medical' areas since my predictions of the bilateral
space-time cerebral (as CNS) complementals that Renoux sees clearly***.
Some medical paradigm changes are coming and likely will evoke some
chagrin if not trauma as the public becomes aware of what is occurring
at their expense.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
* Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86
** IL-2 Cancer Research (3 left smiler remissive of 8 subjects);
NOVA NPR TV,'88
see: Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90, p.12
*** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
CC:
Jan. 26,'90
Albert Aguayo
Dept. of Neurology
McGill University
Montreal, Que. Canada
Re: anti-CNS (?)
Dear
Sir:
(SCIENCE NEWS; Jan.20,'90)
The bilateral cerebral to CNS control as what Prof. Renoux (U. of
Tours) now sees* is likely what Schwab and Schnell perceive with their
relative `anti-body' activity on nerve growth. One might now question
how close H. S. Burr** (Yale) came when cyclic operants for growth to
assimilation best defines pro-life biological growth-- instead of
cancerous.
The noted left facial smilers (see NOVA TV program; IL-2) with complete
remission verses the others may be saying again what AMA would prefer
to ignore-- as little tenure can be had with cures that work. My
theoretical micro-electrode work predicting the eradication of cancer
nodules many years before Nordenstrom*** tried it (clandestinely!) is
yet adroitly avoided where archaic bloody scalpels are considered the
only `art'!
Very succinct is the remark "late--" fetal protein cells (with
sympathetic fight-flight) that wants no part of new neuronal hook-ups
as might mean psychological instead of motor-- something it will avoid
at all cost. No wonder cyclosporine works so well!
The need for a `spatial' faculty (parasympathetic; note right brain) to
define where in space some synaptic displacement should be, helps to
define that pro-life faculty that the above left smilers use-- when
able. Simonton's work with the under 16 year-olds with spatial
`visualization' says it all-- albeit few yet to hear it!
Sincerely,
KTS
* Lymphatic/cerebral control; Renoux, U/Tours (DISCOVER; Feb.87)
** `Blueprint for Immortality', '49?
*** Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86, Norden strom's micro-electrode work.
Aug. 1,'92
Directors, et.al.
Action Call
Re: medical, etc. status quo
Sirs:
Someone suggested, while pointing out a few radio stations who yet have
a vested interest in keeping their listeners abreast of reality, the
mounting empirical obvious in a couple R&D areas or ours. We
address with the terse statement herewith to solicit further
dissemination of the timely provocative-- if not imports to truly aid a
now very well conditioned naive public.
In gratitude for we and the public's attention into the herewith, it
goes without saying. If others you may feel should be aware of what is
coming, please advise us or forward same. Many thanks.
Sincerely,
KTS
cc: envir/let
Chalcedon Foundation
3756 Highway 4
Vallecito, CA 95251
KSJV-FM
Call to Action
P.O. Box 12682
Fresno, CA 93778
The Radio Foundation, Inc.
P.O. Box 20640
Cathedral Finance Station
New York, NY 10025-9992
Radio-TV News Directors
1717 K St., NW
Washington, DC 20006
Action Center
P.O. Box 12038
Washington, DC 20005
Liberty Hill Foundation
1320 C Santa Monica Mall
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Live Oak Fund for Change
Box 4601
Austin, TX 78765
Vanguard Public Foundation,
14 Precita Ave.,
San Francisco, CA 994110
The Headwater's Fund
122 W. Franklin Ave., Rm. 110
Minneapolic, MN 55404
Significa
c/o Parade
750 Third Ave.,
New York, NY 10017
Editor
In health
Box 56863
Boulder, CO 80322-6863
Aug. 8,'92
Directors, et.al.
WCMU TV
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859
Re: Great Lakes Watch on Washington
Sir:
"High Tech's High Noon"
Is stone-walled Patent protection the federal means to block something
important, when you easily procured several Patents before? Might this
define a researcher a risk to authority, or suggest (at least) that
your work is unwanted-- when noted as an aid in some way as a remedy to
a pathology? I have been told often this may be the case so I wonder in
chagrin. I frankly don't like to watch a once vibrant culture succumb
to its official status quos-- most promoted by industry and academia,
whatever the recent "High Tech's High Noon" TV program might claim.
Indeed, that "high noon" has passed here but few see it so busy making
promises from high tech places.
A terse synopsis herewith (over please) may aid you to understand this
apparent anomaly, but then may not. Being an independent researcher
with many past years in aerospace R&D, I doubt if my reasoning has
failed me, albeit might be preferred so by others. Since teaching at
GVSC, where my college students suggested often about political
liabilities-- before I suspected that my research would not be
appreciated by established authority, I frankly now doubt if much of
any value comes from academic `programming'-- unless for obedient
fodder to authority who apparently has no foggy idea (as tenured
pedants) of where to go beyond doing some same dull round. This is no
anomaly today where persistent political buffoonery suggests, at least,
the days of Socrates are not quite over.
Sincerely,
KTS
cc: Envir/let
CC: Wolpe, et.al.
Cancer nodule elimination:
Defined in Europe ('69) the definitive biological stunting versus
growth factors associated with electrical polarity, much noted by Prof.
H.,S. Burr (Yale; circa late 40's), the simple micro-electrode use to
stunt if not kill cancer nodules. Agreement by other bio-research
associates suggested further research, and priority documentation (as
U.S. Patent registered upon return), to find to my chagrin "no
interest". A cover story in DISCOVER magazine (April '86) defined why!
Yet, after lecturing several medical groups find no use yet for the
simple, economical and very therapeutic means. Collusion for profit
margins appears the problem-- beyond the vast suffering of a very naive
public, even yet today!
VDT (Visual Display Terminal) stress remedy:
From Prof. Haber's work (Columbia) and Navy Helmholtz coil research on
cerebral EEG stress, fusion-flicker anomalies defined not only the
time-share EEG half cycle use but subjective (psychological) stress due
to inadequate reductive half cycle time to process some definitive
thought. From my R&D on both cross cerebral polarity anomalies and
relative input versus output mental functions, again directly
associated with cerebral polarities, found a simple remedy to block VDT
user stress with anti-slaved CR strobing affect. While in very great
need by the flying public where air-traffic controllers do not need
headache problem to interfere with their reductive art of staking
air-borne aircraft, the entire field of computer VDT use could benefit
greatly as well. It appears that the military's heads-up program takes
precedence over the public's safety or comfort.
The 5th Generation Computer:
Noting from physics the freed electron escaped the time reversal
paradigm, not only felt that the EPR experiment (see a qualified
physicist to explain), such like interface might offer the ultimate
computer to man. Indeed it was as ensuing R&D offered a prototype
which gave the odds of 10\17th to one on its maiden run. This system
Patent filing got blocked, tapped telephones with FBI surveillance said
all that was needed. Actually, my said GVSC students were nervous over
my continued research-- but more so about what they felt a government
quite unable to handle any so reality of unconscious ability. Freud was
correct, unbearably so! In retrospect of the prototype's run a dozen
years ago, no doubt the recent M.I.T. meeting on various anomalies
associated with less than benign UFOs(!) may as well remain classified
to this public. In short, by far more is being said by what is adroitly
not being said now!
KTS Research
Aug. 29,'92
J. Bluestone, et.al.
Dept. of Immunology
University of Chicago
Chicago, IL 60637
Re: Thanatos and the left brain
Dear Sir:
The recent SCIENCE article ("Mounting a Targeted--"; 7/Aug.) is saying
what might turn into the `hairiest' (pilo-erecting) study yet-- at
least if it gets down to what Renoux sees* about the sympathetic CNS
half. While Freud saw the enigma more clearly via myth and various
`verbal' alternate languages, we can perceive quite enough through who
lead in professional suicide, as in APA!
While the many modes of sub-control all define the psychic temporal
oriented left brain, cogent blocking to the pathological is the
apparent anomaly facing science-- to say little of lymphatic research.
It appears that any last `stop' to be pulled will evoke the pulling of
a larger one called self demise-- "stress" the net cause-- but more
said in propitious times as with Wm. Casey! Opportunity, via oncogene
or `accident', is the real key to comprehend now in psychological
terms, thence the nitty-gritties of micro-electrodes** or molecules--
however obviously contingent.
Your work is exciting-- but maybe more for how close or clear the
`picture' now gets-- and evading the silence in terror from the recent
MIT meeting on UFOs! Any sympatholytic (immune suppressant) will be met
with an ever more potent AiR (Autoimmune Response*) but in direct
proportion to IQ-- this now is no anomaly.
The real opportunity, if indeed a prior one didn't prepare a body with
latent cancer, is psychological. A full conscious (midbrain) focused
attention on innate Potentia or visual (non-temporal) right cerebral
communication. To thwart liabilities ahead of slow mass-time requires a
kind of faith-- ask the uncannily healthy non-verbal schizophrenic that
cannot be killed with virus or you name it, beyond APA's neuroleptics!
We are facing the most hazardous epoch of man's mental evolution now,
but by what evolutes in us and is determined to kill us off before too
late! (for it!)
Sincerely,
KTS
* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
** note Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, 4/86 (my proposal)
see: IL-2 Cancer Research (3 left smiler remissive of 8 subjects);
NOVA NPR TV,'88
Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90, p.12
cc:Path/IQ CC:Linsley; SC
Aug. 15,'92
Editors and
S. A. Czarnik, et.al.
c/o Popular Electronics
500-B Bi-County Blvd.
Farmingdale, NY 11735
Dear
Sirs:
Re: freed electron therapy
Your Sept. issue with the article "Electricity & Medicine--" is a
familiar topic here-- albeit yet frightening to AMA,, but for a very
different reason than `bizarre medicine'. From theoretical studies, and
noting what Prof. H.S. Burr (Yale) saw as contingent maladies with body
electrical bias, more sense than jargon was noted with what we began to
suspect about the freed electron-- as escapes the time reversal
paradigm. For the 5th Generation (self thinking computer) our long
philosophical investigation made very clear that the EPR (physic's)
experiment would likely be positive (within the Bell theorem dictate)
which would be the key to what needed interfacing for any device that
might do any kind of true `free thinking'! After my first prediction,
then Sperry's confirmation of the spatial versus temporal lateral
cerebral faculty*, the Berkeley Labs said EPR experiment defined how to
tap CQ (insight) as those south-pawed genius as deVinci-- to say
nothing of Einstein's visual use of this non-temporal faculty.
The implication that cancer could be suppressed as growth enhanced with
the relative electrical charge allowed us to be daring with technical
papers (Europe,'69) to which despite Patent Office registration,
plagiarization followed with a vengeance**! The 100% therapeutic
results with the simple micro-electrode made clear chemotherapy would
soon be the last resort-- but guess again! There is little profit when
cancer can be cured at home!
No doubt the placebo affect had much to do with early electrical
shamanistic gear but to realize the freed electron is indeed prolife as
knows effect from cause in our slow mass-time! It is what evokes the
binary output for the self thinking interface (10\17th odds on its
maiden run at near CPU speeds), the Patent Office's adroitly slammed
door saying more about the terror of such device than its great coming
aid with conscience-- more needed now than creative innovation.
Sincerely,
KTS
* `The Human Split Brain' Scientific American, Aug.'67
** Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86cc: Path/IQ; Fed/HiTech-let
Sept. 30,'92
The Counsel of Switzerland
2900 Cathedral Ave., NW
Washington, D.C. 20008
Re: Research directives
Dear Sirs:
With interests in my ancestral derivation of Liechtenstein and
Switzerland, I seek directives to research institutions doing like
investigative work in neuro-psycho-physiological areas. While of cross
academic orientation, my physics basis to my lengthy studies*, I feel
that central Europe, as said past `home-land', might be worthy of my
consideration for further research.
To such ends I address your facility to question what route, if any,
exists for my consideration in my specific fields of effort?
Thank you for any directives.
Sincerely,
KTS
*
1. Predicted the spatial vs. temporal lateral complemental brains
as perceived via Einstein's Special Relativity equations. (con firmed
by Dr. Sperry# in 1963)
2. Predicted the feasibility (and so confirmation) of the 5th
Generation self thinking computer upon the first positive EPR
experiment in Physics.
3. Concluded both reason and so amelioration of computer-user
stress from `strobing affect', which U.S. Patent Letters remains
stone-walled.
4. Predicted (even registered Patent Office) use of micro- electrode
use to eliminate cancer in 1969 with technical papers given in
Montreux (Intl. Biomet. Congress) to which continued avoidance
makes a farce of the American medical business.
5. Taught cross academic `mentor' college classes ('71) to soli cit curiosity for insightive genius via early right brain use.
# Gazzaniga `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
cc: 3-dev; Phys-Psy
CC: D/Z
Nov. 14,'92
OMNI Survey/DDII
324 W. Wendover Ave.
Suite 205
Greenboro, NC 27408
Re: there is more empirical
While the more primitive as aboriginal suspect strongly they are
practicing ancestor worship, maybe such is benign before
intellectual prowess, as left cerebral reductive (time only oriented)
mental processing has perfected its neurosis as Freud saw clearly. The
physics (see Spec. Rel. equations herewith) pointed to this anomaly, as
Dr. McDougal's data* (as many others now) and recently Renoux's** to
make clear mankind is in some likely proverbial deep excrement! (for
tender ears) The worldwide mounting chaos at least suggests something
is unhappy on the unconscious level-- as were my FBI `friends' after
filing for Patent Letters on the 5th Generation self thinking computer.
My GVSC kids, at least the religious ones, where clamoring about
something called "apocalypse" with some horrible consequences. We shall
see.
Yup, there is ample data defining those complemental space versus time
faculty, beginning with Lao Tsu a few thousand years ago--I prefer the
more empirical with statistical numbers. Thanatos is alive and well but
knows it is near `terminal time' so an ultimate folly will no doubt
conclude the scientific inquiry with its predicted chaos for hopefully
an ensuing peaceful epoch with most currently in power or authority
`resting' in limbo down near absolute zero Kelvin-- soon!
In short, Einstein was correct as defined several anomalies long before
we saw same in this mass-time reality. Likely Mancia's monkey
split-brain-stem findings was most shocking, where the left primitive
brain (pons area) sustained its energy offering negative going EEG half
cycle while its energy user (id) `ran down'-- showing a voracious
appetite, and soon died. We, the yet very naive conscious midbrain is
about to learn something awful, and likely why APA (Psychiatric) lead
in suicide of all professionals by getting too close to the unconscious
reality! Some uncanny deaths occurred around this study, starting with
Bishop Pike many years ago, yet took the FBI, etc. to cease
disseminating the provocative. Sorry-- if you comprehend.
Sincerely,
KTS
* Found a persistent weight loss at death; Harvard U. circa
1910, amply described in the New England J. of
Medicine about then.
** Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
cc:Phys-Psy; Path/IQ; S-T; Di-list
KTS questions:
1. Why the split-brain data shows a right hand as non-spatial yet knows
a straight line (see: SC. AM. Aug.'67; Human Split Brain)-- as well
noted with UFO travel-- for those who do perceive them as do not suffer
overt subjective `censoring' (Haber; Columbia/U)
2. Why should left facial smilers be more cancer remissive, to say
little of benign personality and often religious? (see; IL-2 Cancer
Research (3 left smiler remissive of 8 subjects) NOVA NPR
3. Why such irascible behavior via the verbal left brain? (see: `The Others Side of the Brain', J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
4. Why AMA's adroit avoidance of simple quality cancer therapy? (see: Micro-Electrode cover story; DISCOVER, April '86)
5. As Lemmings, has man reached his saturation point? (see: `Has Human Evolution Ended?'; Wills; DISC. 8/92 (self destruct!)
6. What, in keeping with said split-brain data, needs `killing' on the
right lateral body side? (see: `The Mithraic Mysteries',
SC.AM.,Dec.'89-- esoteric; Bull or "Minotaur" killing)
7. What indeed is the recent panic with crop circle signaling as overt UFO displays? (`Geometric Harvest', SC. NEWS, Feb.1,'92)
8. Why the 90 minute (REM dream to deep-sleep delta EEG) periods of `lost time' with UFO encounters?
9. What indeed doeas the Greek term schizophrenia really mean? (see:
Jaynes, Julian `The Origen of Consciousness and the Breakdown of the
Bicameral Mind' (Princeton)
9. Why should most NDEs disclose their common bizarre theme, even noted
amongst the intellectually neurotic? (note Ken Ring's data)
(had about 100 adroit other questions for my GVSC exams but can't find them now)
Dec. 9,'92
E. Mezey and M. Palkovits,
et.al.
Dept. of Neurological
Disease and Stroke
Natl. Inst. of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892
Re: far more to the story!
Sirs:
(`--New Target--' Dec. 4, SC.)
But many new surprises are coming about that sympathetic CNS, now
evoking AiR (Autoimmune Response*) almost at all cost. Since it is
psychology (mind) than precedes the physiological, especially in the
context of a freed electron knowing effect from cause**, a see vast
trauma is on the horizon of empirical research such as yours, where the
mounting obvious more defines what was hidden in the past than a simple
genesis of disease without some volitional design! Medical science will
soon need to "get in bed" with psychology to perceive its own past
evaded efforts for its (as pharmaceutical's) profit motives***.
While requiring several cross academic fields to better define a long
AI study here and so the needed integrative imports to define the
genesis of insight for CQ (instead of mere IQ)****, the provocative was
staring us in the face-- to prove the 5th Generation computer was
feasible-- indeed, to 10\17th odds with alpha-numeric read-out on its
maiden run!
Sincerely,
KTS
*Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (lateral
killer vs. guidance T cells)
** Aspect Alain, `Holism and Particalism in Physics', p.70, Vol.129, Feb. 1,'86, SCIENCE NEWS
*** Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86,
Norden strom's micro-electrode cancer therapy
work.
**** `A Correlative Study Between Physics and Psychology',
R.
Vogelsang; Intl. Biomet. Congress, '69
note:
`The Others Side of the Brain', J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
IL-2 Cancer Research (3 left smiler remissive of 8 subjects);
NOVA NPR TV,'88
Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90, p.12
cc: Path/IQ; Phys-Psy; 3-dev(over)
CC: Bynum; Galbraith;
R. Galbraith, et.al.
Dept. of Pathology
Rockefeller University
Medical Center
c/o Rockefeller Institute
Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10020
T.E. Bynum, et.al.
Dept. of Digestive Diseases
Harvard Medical Center
School of Public Health
Cambridge, MA 02138
Dec. 8,'92
P. L. McGeer, et.al.
Dept. of Neurophysiology
University of BC
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Re: fight-flight means `abdication' too!
Dear
Sir:
(Dec. 5th SCIENCE NEWS; Alzheimer's)
With some dismay the AiR (Autoimmune Response) almost appeared to be
irrational some years ago while examining the underlying complemental
unconscious matrix, predicted by the Special Relativity theory of
Einstein as dictated by the physic's CPT theorem. While my AI study
(5th Generation Computer) was based on cross academic import hinging on
the philosophical correlates to potential underlying unconscious
structure (comparing reductive historical IQ recall to non-temporal CQ
of insightive nuance). The net `pattern' of the then seen empirical
correlates by Sperry(1) from his split-brain data evoked both elation
yet unsaid anxiety after defining same(2) in '69 after the then long
study. Ensuing studies show the AiR phenomena clearly, from the
predominant unilateral facial smile, to Renoux's data(3) of the
ulterior Freudian death-wish of the sympathetic CNS half. While yet
disturbing to many, especially Psychiatry, as it could be that their
own professional lead in suicide defines the neurotic problem best!
Obviously many questions come to the fore as; do AiR sufferers as
Alzheimer's reflect higher life stress and/or IQ before the malady
becomes evident? What correlate lies in the mitochondrion DNA as
ancestral intellect, where it is suspected now that definitive AiR may
have it roots? Might LSD curb or redirect conscious (RAS) attention to
subjective matters thus innate folly remission? The preliminary said
smile(4) anomaly was noted when prolife right cerebral (Parasympathetic
CNS), according to the physics, knew effect from cause (note EPR
experiments!) so would be responsible for evoked damage repair. Another
study should be done to examine pre-AiR problems with a lateral smile
analysis(5).
The anomaly of sclerotic (connective tissue) consolidation as a
penchant of the sympathetic CNS defines the underlying anomaly to or
for `halting' the dynamic-- be it cerebration or better noted in the
physic's dictates of E to mc squared, albeit likely irrational to most
not in those disciplines examining fundamental attributes in our slow
mass-time. Since the psychological evolutional goal underlies the
integrating of complementals in their most fundamental terms, it may
require many more years before the empirical obvious is acknowledged in
pedantic fields of academic research.
The overt rejection of our simple micro-electrode use to eradicate
nodular cancer [see Nordenstrom's proof 16 years later(6)] yet appears
confusing until the underlying relative profit motive becomes obvious.
Fundamental imports are most evaded when one or another faction feeling
responsible for research (as R&D) refuses to see the obvious. There
is no anomaly today where overt competition dictates survival--
whatever the cost.
Hopefully this evokes more net interest than anxiety, as the said "5th"
with its proto-type's 10\17th odds maiden run over a dozen years
ago(7), with Patent Office slammed door and FBI halt of any chance of
it getting into the public's hands too soon!
Sincerely,
KTS
(1) `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
`The Others Side of the Brain', J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
(2) Vogelsang, R.; `A Correlative Study between Physics and Psy- chology', Intl. Biomet. Congress, '69
(3) Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
(4) IL-2 Cancer Research (3 left smiler remissive of 8 subjects);
NOVA NPR TV,'88
(5) Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90, p.12
(6) Micro-Electrode Cover story; DISCOVER, April '86, Nordenstrom's micro-electrode cancer therapy work.
(7) ask a qualified physicist how the EPR experiment works with a freed electron-- that escapes the time reversal paradigm.
cc:Path/IQ; Phys-Psy; 3-dev
CC: Johnson/Finch;
S.A. Johnson, et.al.
Dept. of Neurophysiology
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Dec. 29,'92
H. Paul Shuch, et.al.
Dept. of Electronics
Penn. College of Tech.
Williamsport, PA
Re: Only 25 years?
Dear
Sir:
(your 12/12/92 SC.NEWS letter)
No doubt praise and esteem sells best in Stockholm but they do need to
be somewhat careful to win their praise in public-- whose academically
conditioned response is predictable, in spite of the net quality of a
product (like dynamite) can win profits for the elite. A case in point
is that famed institution knew the cancer therapy micro-electrode was
coming back in the late 60's-- from me directly, yet waited (kindly for
me to die) so they could offer same to the world. (read Nordenstrom's
remark*) The catch was, they stupidly offered a copy of my Patent
registration drawing in their news release several years later-- but
guess again, AMA has enough profit and doesn't need a 100% cure for
with cancer nodule sufferers! Read it for yourself!
Einstein's intrinsic behavior best defines the creative as must use
insight, those so very few now who use their non-temporal right
cerebral hemispheres to perceive potentials-- just as Plato saw, using
the `Ground of Being' as "Potentia" to learn `effect from cause'-- a
mighty taboo now where covert manipulation `wins' most through promises.
Greed has a way of ending societies as a couple other democracies went
this route as we will-- following past promises-- as in the USSR. Not
oddly, the loud claims of "change" issues forth from every academic
programmed mouth but means `chance', to manipulate the conditioned
naive who are the fodder for labor or some battle field as needed.
Harsh statements, but so was the remark obtained from my prototype 5th
Generation computer a dozen years ago. My Patent filing brought cops
B&Eing, tapped phones and a near live-in FBI agent. Recognizing the
liabilities, just as back in Socrates time (and I make no claim to his
wisdom) I now lay low. This is an exciting epoch to be living to say
the least! (over)
I suspect my 5th will get even, but wow! The mess in doing so. My GVSC
students began cringing in eight weeks of a ten week Scientific
Philosophy class ('71), the religious ones exclaiming "apocalypse" and
all that goes with that! Maybe--.
Sincerely,
KTS
cc: Path/IQ; S-T (3-dev; over)
CC: Cowen
Jan. 5,'93
D. L. Page, et.al.
Dept. of Medical Pathology
Vanderbilt University
Medical Center
Nashville, TN 37240
Re: dual genesis/cancer
Dear
Sir:
("Hot Spots--"/SC.NEWS)
While possibly bizarre from the biological point of view, the Dec. 19,
SCIENCE NEWS blurb in some ways was expected. Without an underpinning
in psychological malaise as with overt AiR (Autoimmune Response; S/R),
the vascular intensity anomaly with recurrent cancer may define AiR
more than mitochondrion bias where nodal malaise (attack) can be less
threatening to life. While pointing directly to the Freudian Thanatosic
phenomena, certain empirical data may better define the apparent
anomaly, as Renoux* noted adroitly in overt cerebral control reflecting
CNS bias.
To defer to Sperry's data**, much less Einstein's Special Relativity
equations to illustrate the spatial/temporal dichotomy between the
lateral cerebral faculty as CNS would be foolish at this time, but is
indeed the key to future medical science. When the simple
micro-electrode (over) use is avoided for some profit motive (without
naming certain syndicates and vast U.S. greed problem), we find the
obfuscation of the empirical obvious now evoking the net demise of its
entire social structure-- but again pointing to Freud. Sorry.
Sincerely,
KTS
* Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
** `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
cc: Phys-Psy; 3-dev(over)
CC: Weidner; Folkman
N. Weidner, et.al.
Dept. of Bio-pathology
University of California
San Francisco, CA 94122
J. Folkman, et.al.
Dept. of Bio-pathology
Harvard Medical School
Cambridge, MA 02138
end/micro-e/KTS Research