Kts org compiled

KTS compliled 5/5/2k letters:

Archaeology:

June 26, 2k
John Ostrom, et.al.
Peabody Museum
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520
Re: feathered friends
Dear Sirs: (`Overlooked--"(?) June 24, SC. NEWS)

With an early evolution of insects, some likely then flying,, the Longisquama insignis well before Archaeopteryx may have said more about `feeding' when a `vertical stablizer' or `rudder' appendage assembly could help steer when moving rapidly, as I said before.

From being in the aerospace engineering fields, even reductive, or better called reversed engineering in your case, is plausible!

Sincerely, (again)

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

CC: T. Jones; Martin; D/Z w:

Astronomy:

6/29/2k
S. Sigurdsson, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Penn State U.
University Park, PA 16802
Re: Cool yet young coagulated jet matter
Dear Sirs: (`Cool Comets--' 23 June, SCIENCE)

The settle-out time between right angle complemental standing wave matters from a primal galaxy where one revs up to offer higher spin rates at it periphery yet its other spewed in jets as anti-matter with anti-g will someday clarify the enigma. John Bell's LEP effort at CERN was to define this relative matter's g field affect-- even if not the fundamental (Apriori) magnetic force as embeds these complemental matters-- called gravity. When I mentioned to Paul Parsons*, so got the 2dF survey started long ago, it was then a gamble to note relative directions of EMP flows, now much better defined.(over)

47 Tucanae should be noted, if our primal galaxy's jet matter, on a right angle tangent to our disk, even if not derived from the major jet matter cones from Sagittarius, as once our EMP bubble's vortex evoking this primal galaxy.

Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

* 11/5/96
Paul Parsons, et.al.
Astronomy Centre
CPES
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9QH, UK

cc: One Hand; copy/Dalton's letter
CC: Gilliland; Lin; D/Z w:

5/18/2k
B. Savage, et. al.
Dept. of Astrophysics
University of Wisconsin
Madison, WI 53706
Re: bright near quasar?
Dear Sir: (Ast. p.947; 12 May, SCIENCE)

With our primal galaxy's spewed anti-matter jets for globular clusters, little doubt such hydrogen with common G would create a few Novae to appear as the grand primal bubble type (2dF Survey) for a series of `degenerations' to create standing wave `matter'. Whether Zen was the first to prognose `matter' creation via some very potent hand claps remains to be seen, but on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe does imply something very profound!

The EM standing 3-phased hadron (proton or alternate wound neutron) now easily noted, so explains `unraveling' back to gamma as called fission, even for the net energy of evoked fusion when not confined in a core of a huge said Nova. Physics as Astronomy are very near a needed convulsive awakening, at least for the tenured who yet believe in billiard balls over what deBroglie perceived!

The sequence from a hand clap to cosmic bubble to vortex evoked grand primal quasars to spew complemental standing waves at right angles (disk vs. jets) for yet more degenerative `matter' at all opportunity (in clusters some 5B years later) defines a prolific Creator bent on evoking other life conditions for the likely net purpose of evolution-- mental, more than Darwinian necessities.

Possibly a recent letter (over) might mean something more.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

CC: One-Hand; Phys/Psy;
cc: Tripp; D/Z w:

6/5/2k
K. Lanzetta, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
State University of New York
Stony Brook, NY 11794
Re: `All Aglow--' indeed!
Dear Sir: (May 27th, SCIENCE NEWS)

That `huge early burst' is being looked at by the 2dF survey now, after I suggested the Zen belief of a hand clapping to get things started out of the primal magnetic flux-- even on the many neat 600Bly intervals-- all at once since time didn't then exist as no mass-for-time did either. Photons as some `particle' is wrong as refractive index of magnteic fields (including variations), the Zeeman affect defines red shift, less on distance, even if more with UV. the quantized nucleon where compound wound trefoils now define the proton or neutron standing EM waves (with a reversed twist), or the short temporal 2 phased meson that unravels back to pure gamma so easily-- to not mention some coming controlled fission/fusion!

Many anomalies have been understood now since Parsons as Sussex reflected his disdain at first about Huchra's data and some hand-clapping, but from past theoretical derivational examinations-- from Einstein's E side of his Special Relativity equations as the primal aleph for all subducted mass-for-time with standing waves, the only answer was seen. Even our space-time derived so oriented bilateral cerebral faculty I predicted in the early 50's has been amply confirmed-- as expected great psychological anxiety since!

A copy of a recent letter (over) may aid in perceiving a broader scope to see the genesis of the universe-- as unquestionably a very bright beginning, even if no one was around to see it as the many cosmic bubble periphery lit-up with millions of primal quasar vortex to spew complemental quantized standing wave `matters' at right angles (due to anti-g) for primal galaxies with spin-up radials-- or jet matter for spin-in globular galaxies later.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

cc: One-Hand; Cernicharo letter + Silk (over)
CC: Silk; Frenk; D/Z w:

5/11/2k
W. Evans, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Oxford University
Oxford, UK
Dear Sir: Re: `Milky Way Looks--'(?) (28 April; SCIENCE)
Maybe the 2dF data will now explain more about primal quasar/galaxy jet matter globular clusters as recede from anti-g as are the complemental anti-EM standing wave `matter' ejecti with a `spin-down' instead of spin-up for outer peripheral angular velocity as called some "Big Kid".

If any dark `matter' exists, it would need to be those open holes in past centers where the primal one-handed cosmic claps occurred to evoke grand bubbles (2dF) for primal quasar vortex, to then evoke standing wave matter to buy time! Once theory gets cleared up, then surveys to define direction as rate of various cosmic bubble evoked galaxies will get understood-- even maybe the vast current neurosis of tenured researchers! The BOOMERANG data does look good-- assuming those one degree factors is a whole cosmic bubble-- on those neat 600Bly intervals!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

cc: One-Hand; Phys/Psy
CC: Wilkinson; Hodge; van den Bergh; Mauskopf; D/Z w:

6/26/2k
E. DeLuca, et. al.
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: anti-matter plum?
Sirs: (`Model Tracks--'; June 24, SC. NEWS)

Noting the pole ends doing the spewing as some normal Novae, our more petite kind, now agitated by planetary gravity to stir up more kinds of trouble for we locals, may be defining itself. The ionized matter that appears to turn our ionosphere almost positive with its burps would show anti-matter got this far, even if anti-g would drive it, as jet matter from a fusion `processor', away from primal galaxies away as complemental koinomatter.

While dubious of any net globular masses might be seen out there as some late sister amorphous galaxy, the sun's jets might be yet noted during these more cantankerous `burping' cycles.

Of interest are the right angled ejecti between complemental matters, whether created by primal genetic EMP bubbles or the primal vortex evoked quasar for a primal galaxy such as ours?

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
cc: One Hand
CC: Antiochos; Hildner; Gopalswamy; D/Z w:

6/29/2k
G. Dalton, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Oxford
Oxford, U.K.
Re: 2dF survey
Dear Sir: (`Galaxy Survey--';June 23 SCIENCE)

The confirmations look fine yet few realize that dv/dt dictates wave front deceleration thus red shift defining the far side cosmic bubble's light get shifted down from the fore-side bubble half. Obviously the `explosion of the primal hand clapped EMP to create the bubble would not be seen as no standing wave electron had yet be formed, so that decelerating EMP up to vortex starts would not be seen-- even if possibly Higgs field `particles' yet.

If there might be any means to note the spin direction of primal vorticies as evoke the primal quasars on those grand EMP bubble's peripheral front, their common koino vs. anti-matter kind might be defined-- i.e: contra-rotating adjacent galaxies somehow evoking complemental matter for anti-g between so such spin-up to define relative standing EM wave `matter' kind.

Interesting would have been to be a mouse attending that `Maxed-Out' conference, as even the ignorance yet for `clean' newer jet matter `clusters' of early kinds of anti-matter-- evading their primal galaxy's eviction with anti-g at right angles. Whether of the major jet or many Novae created anti-matters above or below a primal galaxy's disk, complementarity is the whole game in creation with `condensed out' standing wave matter from gamma.

Very Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu --if yet on the web!)

cc: One Hand; Phys/Psy
CC: Weinberg; D/Z w:

5/12/2k
J. Cernicharo, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Consejo Cientificas,
Inst. Estructura de la Materia,
Dept. Fisca Molecular,
Serrano 121, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Re: `Windows Through--'; 28 April SCIENCE
Dear Sir:
The `adjacent jets' (VLA1 and VLA2) of anti-matter (via anti-g), best defines complemental created matter-- likely started in the VLA4 primal quasar/galaxy. Since the 2dF sky survey data confirms the prediction of created matter via grand EMPs, so standing wave `matter' followed to buy `slow time' for evolution in a universe!

Of interest are the several modes of `condensing' out heavier or larger quantified standing wave `atoms' via the use of fission by compression, the Novae, just as our sun-- now burping anti-matter from its poles when stressed by planetary gravitational upset.

Your work is seminal, even if it may take many years for the more tenured to see it! Thanks for the fine article!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

cc: One-Hand; Phys/Psy
CC: Noriega-Crespo; D/Z w:

6/29/2k
A. Loeb, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: black hole?
Dear Sir: (`Black Holes--' June 17, SC. NEWS)

You appear more sympathetic to `alternate scenarios' while the tenure seekers blunder on avoiding reality in the article. The 2dF survey (note: "Galaxy Survey--"; June 23 SCIENCE) now well defines what was predicted many years ago, below, may help. It was noted while doing a lengthy study on `unraveling' standing wave `matter', to regain the primal cosmic EMP gamma energy from fission.

The real question looms now about the remaining close-quarters anti-g phenomena where standing wave matter is yet being created (electron-positron annihilations) for our residual quasar/galaxy core vortex is dying with its residual energy to help define the pending ultimate entropy.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu --if yet on the web!)

cc: One Hand; Parsons stm.
CC: Kormendy; D/Z w:

6/25/2k
Baruch S. Blumberg, et. al.
c/o Inst. of Space Studies
and/or Ames Research/Moffett Fld.
NASA Goddard Flight Center
New York, NY 10025
Re: subordinate DNA to mitochondrion
Sirs: (`-- Extreme Life'; July, Sc. American)

When Sperry's data* confirmed the physics CPT theorem as contingent to the metal (psychological) matrix of needed space AND time orientations, the rectilinear `knowing' left brain make clear of the operants underlying the UFO, thus the vast anxiety in U.S. authority bent on using these `definitive' seeing/knowing entity, as offered the fastest then known means for espionage-- within or out of some planet winner syndrome sufferers.

With the mounting obvious and so many fully aware of the reality of the said bilateral subterfuge as physics correlates to unconscious faculty (most in keeping with Freudian thought), the past impasse of comprehending late man's deep neurosis, even over what our own ancients (Egyptian or Easter Isle) well knew about what can now be understood as anti-g, superconductivity and `twisted' whole quarks (hadrons), to say nothing of the expedience of the Top quarks leaving this environment, as anti-matter jets leaving primal quasar/galaxies-- for later globular sister galaxies!

Blumberg's left eye (page 30; said Sc. Am. issue) defines his aptitude to `dig'-- a very dangerous thing for others that refuse to be under a tight federal contract to sustain wanted silence! A vast reckoning is pending, most via the freed electron's expressing reality in a digital (verbal) way for all to comprehend the dire straits we have placed our stupid conscious minds into!

A recent letter copy to Scientific American may help define the pending trauma of knowing our `deceased' as full govern us for a folly-prone need for their own mtDNA survival above entropy, when lacking fatty lipids from some incarnate. (75%! as just found)

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; copy ScAm let (over)
CC: D/Z w: subXfile

Biology:

6/14/2k S. L. Miller, et. al,
Dept. of Biogenetics
University of California
San Diego/La Jolla, CA 92093

Re: freed electron; prolife before matter
Dear Sir: (`Molecule Sparks--' June 3, SC. NEWS)

Between the PNA or even abrupt negative going EEG for REM dream, that which knows potentials as uses the freed electron (note EPR experiments), the left hand of the electron (Asimov) defines what Heisenberg noted when escaping the time reversal paradigm. Once the basis of all physics is understood via the Einstein Special relativity equations, complementarity between the now versus the created (historical) makes sense, even if evoking so much terror today in the more reductive left brain dominated seeking tenure!

Sperry* opened the can of worms when the physics denoted the so needed complemental dictates throughout mass-time. Biology as now neurophysiology falls into line-- maybe to integrate all of the sciences yet haggling over their many definitudes.

Contingent to fetal split-genetic use, likely only a freed electron could enact the feat by knowing things ahead of our slow time-- especially if some pre-goal with some past genetic pattern were needed to propagate a `body' to house those complemental two space/time oriented faculty between our ears! So what came before prokaryotes, if not some semblance of a fundamental bacteria?

We suspect there will be even something more fundamental than PNA when mass-time's matter is but EM standing waves evoked by grand EMP (2dF Sky Survey) created quasars for our ensuing slow serial time. After all, what clapped into existence those vast EMPs out there on neat 600M light year intervals? Did ancient Zen know?

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 , and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path IQ; 3-dev
CC: Nielson; D/Z w:

7/12/2k
Editor(s)
New England Journal of Medicine
10 Shattuck St.,
Boston, MA 02115-6094
Re: Vol. 343, No. 1 issue?
Sirs:
Maybe blind for the few libraries I haunt up here in the Manistee Forests, your No. 1 publication caught my eye to wonder if somehow was due to Lunberg's vacating JAMA-- a couple weeks after I sent him there herewith? Noting long ago (even for me) McDougal's report (Harvard; circa 1910?) of `mass loss at death' with what appears as mtDNA `vacating the area', ensuing studies implies a pending `new paradigm' of thought, even with alternate therapies.
With our finite yet fleeting UFO problems, likely working for the Feds (or maybe visa versa!), the revulsion towards any quality therapeutic becomes almost obvious-- yet defines best the need of our semi-dying-- to feed their 75% energy (fatty lipids) to those unseen-- as for unsaid services!

Since the confirmation via Sperry* for the predicted space-time complemental unconscious CNS structure, all hell has broken loose when mentioned facts get claimed as `secret'. As you guys started the provocative way back (I've yet got McDougal's report)-- maybe its time to catch up, even examine what Lumberg is up to now!

It appears that the late intellectual evoluting mtDNA in the late human animal has gotten out-of-hand for its conscious mind (midbrain; RAS), is buying time with half truths in desperation, with aid from unseen henchmen now by our over eating to feed them our fatty lipids, whatever the net cost to the human physiology.

I suspect Sheffler's text Mitochondrion will break the bank if it sould fully get comprehended by the medical in this society!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

** `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; ScAm etc. let; ; 3/dev; Sheffler let
CC: D/Z w:

6/20/2k
Project Censored @ 2000
c/o Sonoma State University
1801 E. Cotati Ave.,
Rohnert Park, CA 94928-3609
Re: yet no 100% cancer therapy with a battery?
Sirs: (`Project Censored'; June/July NEXUS)

Maybe a Discover cover story is not enough, so we may deserve our vast cancer death rate-- to gratify AMA's nice profits while yet playing dumb of the electrical charge for pro or anti-life! Maybe it is too simple-- as the seen EEG phase between those same CNS that occupy our complemental lateral cerebral hemispheres! (over)
If any finding should have ever been advertised, it was Sperry's, when his split brain data* defined the rectilinear left brain, as MUFON well described the UFO travel, since the physics well showed a complemental space vs. time derived mental matrix as noted in the Special Relativity equations, demanded by the CPT theorem! My prediction some dozen years before Sperry only earned my title of "loose cannon" while doing aerospace computer R&D-- thence my kicked in door, cops, FBI, even CIA on a foreign shore, to define the underlying terror of late authority-- governed by the yet unseen, who understand entropy too well so their needs for us as kept dumb incarnate well being!

The greater value of a dying person than healthy may so underlie the needs of the medical professionals, just as the APA's lead in suicide-- when they begin to consciously understand their schizophrenics whose genius defines too much about the unconscious! No doubt Freud saw it clearly when using `Thanatos' to define the id when we consciously get too close to recognizing reality. My few abrupt suicides in some very high IQ people said enough for me!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

* #

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; 3-dev(over)
CC: D/Z w:

6/23/2k
Editor(s), et. al.
Scientific American
415 Madison Ave.,
New York, NY 10017-1111
Re: proteomics sans mitochondrion?
Dear Sirs: (July 2k issue)

Since it is mind over matter, the mtDNA should be understood more than the DNA, which is merely what Darwin looked for when a physiological body needed to change to accommodate the weather! Maybe the `proto'zoon should be examined in view of relative evolutional time, as its need for some prokarotic to eukaryotic DNA `body' design in which to house itself against the `elements' of other hungry critters like itself in another walled cell. While a fine exercise counting genes in the DNA, that is not "where its at" since mitochondrion governs with a mind so uses that body's DNA `mechanics' (patterns) to build or modify the physical if no AiR (Autoimmune Response) for mutation or a death-wish is promoted. A conditioned dumb conscious mind is to be favored whatever is now claimed, but to block any right brain insight as may help define subjective reality-- however fear evoking, even suicide in the higher intellectual as our esteemed APA professionals!
Darwin may have gone as far in his time as possible to suggest DNA physiological control, even mentioning the psychic underlying design to any nature of some animal. To replicate his most important finding in the genome project does not yet touch on the most important of Nature's goal of mental evolution in a finite structure as mitochondrion, however neurotic today at humanity's late stage of mental evolution.

Because the freed electron evokes some `happening' in our slow relative time (note EPR data!), it likely first created the gene, but then assembles them at conception to be sure the future physical `specimen' fits the needed `structure' to house some irascible `soul'-- or mitochondrion, noting its ever greater size for evolution in IQ-- since at least back in the days of Lucy! That follow-up study of equating what McDougal found at Harvard (circa 1910) with weight loss at death, haunts us as we examine Martian
data as ancient Egyptian claim of astral travel using anti-g with a twisted (temperature/superconductivity) third quark leg on some hadron. Without much gluten left on Mars, their inhabitants may have migrated here, with no more than mtDNA to feed on the naive on planet earth-- very secretly as all UFO travel is now.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: Phys/Psy; S-T
CC: Preston; Mayr; D/Z w:

7/9/2k
Immo E. Scheffler, et. al.
Dept. of Genetics
University of California
San Diego, (La Jalla), CA 92093
Re:mtDNA `mass'?
Dear Sir: (your fine `Mitochondria')

While yet `plowing through' what to an EE appears obviously a quality text to be envied, my also obvious but abstruse inquiry-- based on a lengthy study into `psychology' based on physics, some anomalous questions came to the fore, tersely indicated in a letter written to Scientific American (over). In short, to realize the binaries of genetic import may never define a mental contingency, yet that underlies the net behaviors of any animal-- the human one facing some real problems which appear somewhat answerable via the split-brain data*-- as said defined in physics.
   I hope to end my `wallowing' into your `definitudes' hopefully soon(!)-- but ask the most bizarre question facing possibly our real dilemma of intellectual development, especially associated with the human covert manipulation for survival or esteem as the `win syndrome' now becoming most irrational in my humble opinion.    The nitrogen predominance in genetic structure infers its need of historical `program' (genes) thus accruing behavioral record as might constitute psychological evolution, whether in the DNA as used for either the `physical' or mtDNA `psychological', thus conceivably contingent to valance or charge-- seen as what the freer electron might offer. Since the time reversal paradigm of W. Heisenberg (sorry!)-- as the ample empirical data of the EPR experiments as a factor of `knowing potentials', is now noted as what `uses' somehow our right cerebral hemisphere (CQ; creative insight). A can of worms becomes apparent as to what indeed `is' the other deductive (sympathetic CNS `fight/flight) mental attribute with time orientation so clearly noted using our left brain?
   Since one of my pre-med students said a repeat of McDougal's bizarre findings of mass loss at physiological death**, one could ask next "what got up and left?"-- so the weird next question of can that `mass' be defined as possibly mtDNA? I'm at a loss to suggest any place to where it might `go', yet some of my students giggle and mention UFOs, assuming mass does exist therewith! Your genius should find a way of repeating McDougal's work but somehow catching to weigh whatever mass gets up to leave, via the breath?
   There is data defining a kind of `anti-g' with superconductivity, thus conceivably `propulsion' at reduced temperatures with twisted nucleons-- the top quark defining same most vividly as obviously cannot have the `mass' claimed from a finite lepton! In short, cross academic import is looming enough to beg some mighty curious questions-- thus in part why I struggle with your erudite text, possibly to define some fool in rags! Sorry, if this misses its mark-- or evokes the anxiety of which a few super minds did very quickly commit suicide upon pondering.
   Maybe Freud was right, to suggest why do our APA professionals lead in suicide today? Because it appears obvious that our own left brain dominance is contingent with irrational behavior-- one could wonder (if yet able) what did happen to our midbrain (RAS) or conscious mind at this very late hour-- lacking much nuance of conscience? The now noted female's often decoupled anterio-corpus callosum says much about an innate `lobotomy'-- noting Gorman's Time cover story goof of 7/17/95! Did Lucy's mtDNA get this whole mess started?

Sincerely, KTS Research (note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
** Harvard U. circa 1910; published in New England J./Med.

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; 3/dev; Sc.Am. Let. copy CC: D/Z w:

6/1/2k

E-Mail to: Dr. M. Zimmermann, et.al.

Re: aboriginal disease

Noting what your brother Dave said about your efforts, can there be seen yet any net difference between those aboriginal people's diseases and their life styles (other than obesity)-- as to whom they turn for psychic reinforcement or guidance? While likely a bizarre question, data now implies the use of right cerebral non-temporal insight may offer far more than just creative ideas-- as the guidance T-4 cell in lymphatic control, a big factor in the survival of the Australian aborigine, using what they call their `dream-time' when seeking game for food. This same parasympathetic CNS faculty appears most to offer quality subjective pro-life guidance for feeding.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA

(No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

6/29/2k
F. Zufall, et. al.
Dept. of Neurobiology
University of Maryland
School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD 21217
Re: nose for phermones plus
Dear Sir: (`Mice have--' june 17th, SC. NEWS)

Since the split-brain data* define the complemental space/time attributes of the bilateral CNS with very different aptitudes of sensing as expression, the `definitive' pheromone detection might indicate the left brain's greater attention thus possible associate neuronal connection. The other `gestalt' sensing right brain sans serial temporal order might then sense the environment, as liabilities in a more subtle way to warn, even of not the fight-flight for survival arousal data for the sympathetic faculty.

If indeed the VNO factor, maybe even some nasal laterality, might be traced (or has been) for some empiricial data, I would appreciate any contingent import theretoo. Many thanks.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ;
CC: Mombaerts; D/Z w:

Neurophysiology:

6/29/2k
F. Zufall, et. al.
Dept. of Neurobiology
University of Maryland
School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD 21217
Re: nose for phermones plus
Dear Sir: (`Mice have--' june 17th, SC. NEWS)

If indeed the VNO factor, maybe even some nasal laterality, might be traced (or has been) for some empiricial data, I would appreciate any contingent import theretoo. Many thanks.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ;
CC: Mombaerts; D/Z w:

7/19/2k
E. D. Reichle, et. al.
Dept. of Neuropsychology
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Re: relative `E' availability
Dear Sirs: (SC. NEWS; July 8th, `Behavior')

Adroit indeed from physics, so why not deduce the obvious?

After scanning several research people there at C-Mellon U., with their relative `interests' only back ten years (below), suspicion prevails as to how many suicides occurred, especially of the APA ilk doing such studies? If none, a recent inquiry herewith could evoke more curiosity at this late hour. Somehow, those with the greater winner syndromes in life find the power to govern, but as their governed, never manage to find out what governs themselves as do the governing-- especially when called secret today!
Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

cc: D/Z w:

6/14/2k
B. Litt, et. al.
Dept. of Neurophysiology
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Re: brain stem EEGs?
Dear Sir: (`Endgame--' June 3, SCIENCE NEWS)

While likely bizarre, the predicted space vs. time so oriented complemental CNS, when confirmed by Sperry* not only raised some eyebrows but consternation amongst Federal people upon giving a terse paper in Europe in the late 60's, likely due to classified work on special computers for aerospace done at that time. The so implied need of such complemental `servo-loop' for the like human conscious awareness, made clear that whatever drove the lateral two brain halves as possibly the pons or lower spinal cord was in some innate way associated with Einstein's Aleph end-points seen in his Special Relativity equation, a provocative import at that time, yet evoking anxiety in several fields of investigation.

Noting the EEG phase to net aptitude of lateral cerebral function also fit the relative time dichotomy, the temporal (rhythmic) vs. `immediate' (non-slope) half cycle associated with visual inputs or REM dream further confirmed the physics anomaly to goad an investigation into relative time as the basis of mental processing, depending on which said Aleph dictated conscious awareness. Persistent left brain's rhythmic epileptic drive with historical deductive serial mental operants, as the typical binary computer, evoked the question of its complemental of not only the spatial aptitude but non-serial-temporal, much as noted by the Australian aboriginal's `dream time' use of prognosing game in the future tense, as spatial `place' implied the profound as contingent to creative insight, to say little of REM dream of which Freud examined quite carefully, even the weird `revulsive' Thanatos anomaly as may be the genesis of the epileptic response to the unwanted.

Noting the left cerebral removal yet return to some `normalcy' as Sperry found, the regained RAS (midbrain) conscious control over serial temporal life redefined the physic's prognosis of mind in some way over matter in relative time, was the key to unconscious `union' or integration, to explain both Freud and neurophysiology together, thus a possible means to block or enhance (sans neuro-transmitter adjuvant intervention), yet the likely brain-stem net connections to define what as where to so decouple the irascible.

While the said deeper anxiety was noted in the religious (Darwin syndrome?) or the more ominous by our Federal government where rectilinear `knowing' of the left brain and associated correlates to UFO displacement (note `83 MUFON!), there may be more reasons for a far greater anxiety in a kept very dumb public today.

With the more finite NMRs, etc.-- it may now be possible to perceive the finite rhythmic excitation point to ablate same to more easily `decouple' the irascible than a whole half cerebral hemisphere, albeit a new lobotomy using more finesse than an ice-pick!

Hope this is some food for thought as could be the right time-- before our fight-flight left brain user sympathetic CNS blows us all off of this planet!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 , and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; 3/dev; S-T
CC: Spencer; Lowenstein; D/Z w:

Physics:

6/24/2k
C. L. Smith, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University College of London
London, UK
Re: `Large Hadron--' July, SC. AM.
Dear Sir:

Indeed these are exciting days in view of the 2dF data also, as defines the grand `hand claps' in cosmic bubbles to evoke grand EMPs for subsequent vortex for quasars to `degenerate' standing wave `matter'! CERN may have a potent `machine' but none like the Apriori-- especially as all those Big Bangs on neat 600Mly intervals were done all at once, especially when c was infinite, lacking a dense magnetic field to hamper that velocity. It was Einstein asking about the Michelson Morley test the correct question about the ether being pulled along with our iron core!

The pressure now is on as John Bell reflected to me just before he died, does the electron and positron have anti-g between, thus explains the jet matter from primal quasar cores-- as even their globular late blooming accruing sister cluster galaxies?

Below are a few past letter copies to better define my original theory as defined the said jets well before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove their existence.
Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

CC: One-Hand; Phys/Psy;
cc: D/Z w:
COPY:
3/19/2k
Reinhard Stock, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Frankfurt
Frankfurt, Germany
Re: `FIREBALLS'(?)
Dear Sir: (April SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN p.16>)

6/17/2k
R. Y. Chiao, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Berkeley CA 94720
Re: red shift
Dear Sir: (`Light Pulses--' June 10, SC. NEWS)

Light waves evoke their own impediment with peaks of denser magnetic fields (no quantized photons) so their long distance travel evokes the most red shift, assuming no magnetic matter like stars exist along the path as most distort EM waves, as well noted with the Zeeman affect. Sadly Einstein didn't recognize the Michelson Morley experiment more clearly, even if he did ask adroitly if the `ether' was somehow being "pulled along" with this planet-- filled of a ferrous material!

Soon it will be recognized that `all' is EM standing waves, made by a `clapped hand' on neat 600Mly intervals across this universe (note: 2dF survey; even in same SCIENCE NEWS albeit ambiguously), but huge EMPs to evoke quasar vortex on grand said bubbles to invoke `mass' for slow time, even complemental gravity for anti-matter jets for globular sister galaxies from a primal galaxy as ours. We suspect tenure time has about run out, thus some scary days ahead for most of the claimed `sciences' now.

To define c may be better as the `now' in terms of the E side of the Special Relativity equation, as denser magnetic fields became the genesis of quantized `matter', as well as the said decelleration factor ,that primal velocity shifting so well noted around the higher magnetic stars along the way-- no black holes. Sorry.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

PS: note my past letter of 7/11/94; R. Y. Chiao, P. G. Kwiat and
A. M. Steinberg, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: "Faster-than--"; 7/2/94 SC.NEWS)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Nimtz; Steinberg; D/Z w:

Psychology:

6/5/2k
C. H. Zeanah, et. al.
Dept. of Psychology
Tulane School of Medicine
Tulane University
New Orleans, LA 70118
Re: neither defense nor violence (?)
Dear Sir: (`Attachment--'; May 27, SC. NEWS)

To lack fight-flight or sympathetic CNS left cerebral dominance, thus little active reductive (IQ) reasoning could explain most of the depressive history as evokes the de-tachment `disorder', even if disorder stems from active fight flight behavior in reality.

The whole sad phenomena does suggest however the active friendship with whomever-- as using the right brain input, assuming a fully integrated anterio-corpus callosum for some insight into consciousness (RAS; Midbrain) to possibly sense who not to get friendly with, if truly dangerous!

The bilateral space-time awareness as Sperry found* well defines our subjective reality-- even insight for genius and conscience-- so lacking in the more manipulative intellectual-- to say little of APA's lead in overt suicide as Freud clearly pointed out. My few abrupt suicides said more than I care to repeat when defining the unconscious in more empirical terms!

Some current work with youngsters on 5HT re-uptake adjuvants with defining the unconscious matrix is turning around a few, to say little of their enthusiasm to learn more, so I'm beginning to now suspect academia's rote programming as part of their problem! The Australian aborigine using their `dream-time' as likely the above attachment disorder (noting EEGs), may permit them to escape the facade of social `order'-- which is anything but benign today.

Interesting would be a gender study to find when the female, when lacking parent-figure stimulation, looses her bilateral anterior connection, as so prevalent in western society yet not Mongolian? (note over)

Sincerely,

KTS Research 49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; Gorman let.(over)
CC: O'Connor; D/Z w:

7/19/2k
E. D. Reichle, et. al.
Dept. of Neuropsychology
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Re: relative `E' availability
Dear Sirs: (SC. NEWS; July 8th, `Behavior')

Adroit indeed from physics, so why not deduce the obvious?

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

cc: D/Z w:

5/19/2k
Raj Persaud, et. al.
Maudsley Hospital and
Inst. of Psychiatry
London SE5 8AF, UK
Re: depression
Dear Sir: (12 May SCIENCE; Science's Compass; letters)

Young women indeed-- albeit overt suicide in the more intellectual male as likely perceives reality subjectively. (Freud!) The anomaly of APA (Psychiatric) lead in suicide of all professionals says much to this yet apparent enigma of left cerebral Thanatos!

The net `insulating' effect of a semi lobotomy (decoupled fore-brain corpus callosum) allows for much subjective folly to ensue, yet the mtDNA bias in a female likely prevents overt abdication. To pacify the unhappy left cerebral id with a neuroleptic chemo-lobotomy-- to evade the right brain's non-temporal insight offer (superconscious for conscience), better defines all late academic programming efforts, especially using Ritalin for more censoring 5HT, to yet evade any cross academic import. Our late dumbed down state for automatons to run point says much about who now governs whom we only think governs us. The proof is seen with an official ego-maniac trying to duplicate the ancient Egyptians on TV. Ach!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

CC: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy;
cc: Kessler; Montgomery; Olney; D/Z w:

6/17/2k
A. Hejmadi, et. al.
Dept. of Psychology
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Re: `Dancing--' (June 10, SC. NEWS)
Dear Sir:

Maybe `seeing' would better define the ability to `perceive' the subtle in others, especially as the right brain dominant might so much better `recognize'-- noting the space oriented Australian aboriginal using their `dream time' while yet fully awake! Your data defining the western neurotic mind, as semi-lobotomized, to realize only what the left brain allows, to show American women's best survival means with only sycophantic promises or some political intrigue, well defined by a cover story* some time ago.

A study with a UCLA BIS grant after defining the two complemental space/time bilateral cerebral faculty from physics in the late 60's but on bilateral smile dichotomies** stirred up much resentment-- which defined the anomalous academic programming of only the reductive time oriented left cerebral hemisphere. This mounting empirical obvious would fit your findings well, especially by noting the right brain use of the hindu as said aboriginal.

As Sperry*** amply confirmed my physics predictions some years before, some abrupt suicides occurred before I fully understood what Freud perceived, unquestionably the coming need of all to comprehend soon,, especially in the fields of psychology.

Hopefully this evokes more interest than anxiety-- in view the lead in suicide of American APA professionals!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

** Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90, p.12 ***`The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67-- and
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; S-T; * Gor/let copy (over)
cc: D/Z w:

7/13/2k
N. Etkoff, et. al.
Dept. of Psychoneurophysiology
Mass. Gen. Hospital East,
Charlestown, MA 0213?
Re: right brain aphasics
Dear Dr. Etkoff: (Aug. DISCOVER; `--Lie Detectors'

Not only does the non-temporal* know spatial qualities but finite within space-- noting the Australian aboriginals. Whether called insight for conscience or perceptive skills somewhat better than the more `tactile' and verbal-- most prevaricating to `win', the physics explains it all-- albeit a bit beyond other scientific fields of `finite' perusal! The real trauma coming is when the bilateral smile becomes understood, as the neurotic, too often as left brain dominants in some established authorized authority!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; Gor-let (over)
CC: D/Z w:

6/27/2k
Dr. M. E. Chafetz, Pres. et. al.
2600 Virginia Ave. NW, Ste. 502,
Washington, DC 20037
Re: Diane Rehm's `alcohol' program
Dear Sir: (`Authority of Experts'-- indeed!)

Revealing was the discussion contingent to ethanol use-- but most by the psychoanalytical means of voice stress as worded jargon so elegantly noted today. The terror of finding our `self' underlies most of not all of our vast neurosis leading to maybe a net good, of thinning our very sick animal specie with too much IQ now.

Much as using a 5HT enhancer (Ritalin) to slow the kids down to get programmed into official ritual (for the State), we can see a vast folly underway to squelch any further use of CQ but for IQ, to do some same dull round until dead-- as run point for the few `elitized' who want to win the planet-- by hook or by crook!
From my extensive physics to neurophysiology-- via aerospace computer R&D back 50 years ago, the split-brain data defines our huge enigma-- as the left cerebral neurosis defining the root of our dilemma-- I suspect you might perceived. Assuming you are versed in some of the bilateral cerebral anomalies*, the decoupled anterio corpus callosum (auto lobotomy) so well noted in the more intellectual female**, the diffeence between insight use for genius and redundant parroting for credentialized `experts' shows where we are headed!

A few past `booze' quips below-- indicating my one beer a day as sympatholytic has defied any further chest pains-- and I fully consciously suspect a far more perception (spatial insight usage) to wade through the cross academic data needed to continue my studies-- now 73 years ancient. Sorry for my tirade but I have over earned it. (note 5th Generation--' fiasco; herewith)

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

** Gor-let (copy herewith)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; 3/dev(over); **
CC: D/Z w:

5/19/2k
Raj Persaud, et. al.
Maudsley Hospital and
Inst. of Psychiatry
London SE5 8AF, UK
Re: depression
Dear Sir: (12 May SCIENCE; Science's Compass; letters)

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

CC: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy;
cc: Kessler; Montgomery; Olney; D/Z w:

end/5/5/2k BB letters compiled