Archaeology:
June 26, 2k
John Ostrom, et.al.
Peabody Museum
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520
Re: feathered friends
Dear Sirs:
(`Overlooked--"(?) June 24, SC. NEWS)
With an early evolution of insects, some likely then flying,, the Longisquama
insignis well before
Archaeopteryx may have said more about `feeding' when
a `vertical stablizer' or `rudder'
appendage assembly could help steer
when moving rapidly, as I said before.
From being in the aerospace engineering fields, even reductive, or better
called reversed
engineering in your case, is plausible!
Sincerely, (again)
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
CC: T. Jones; Martin; D/Z w:
Astronomy:
6/29/2k
S. Sigurdsson, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Penn State U.
University Park, PA 16802
Re: Cool yet young coagulated jet matter
Dear Sirs:
(`Cool Comets--' 23 June, SCIENCE)
The settle-out time between right angle complemental standing wave matters
from a primal
galaxy where one revs up to offer higher spin rates at it
periphery yet its other spewed in jets
as anti-matter with anti-g will
someday clarify the enigma. John Bell's LEP effort at CERN
was to define
this relative matter's g field affect-- even if not the fundamental (Apriori)
magnetic force as embeds these complemental matters-- called gravity. When
I mentioned
to Paul Parsons*, so got the 2dF survey started long ago, it
was then a gamble to note relative
directions of EMP flows, now much better
defined.(over)
47 Tucanae should be noted, if our primal galaxy's jet matter, on a
right angle tangent to our
disk, even if not derived from the major jet
matter cones from Sagittarius, as once our EMP
bubble's vortex evoking
this primal galaxy.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
* 11/5/96
Paul Parsons, et.al.
Astronomy Centre
CPES
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9QH, UK
cc: One Hand; copy/Dalton's letter
CC: Gilliland; Lin; D/Z w:
5/18/2k
B. Savage, et. al.
Dept. of Astrophysics
University of Wisconsin
Madison, WI 53706
Re: bright near quasar?
Dear
Sir:
(Ast. p.947; 12 May, SCIENCE)
With our primal galaxy's spewed anti-matter jets for globular clusters,
little doubt such
hydrogen with common G would create a few Novae to appear
as the grand primal
bubble type (2dF Survey) for a series of `degenerations'
to create standing wave
`matter'. Whether Zen was the first to prognose
`matter' creation via some very potent
hand claps remains to be seen, but
on neat 600Mly intervals across this universe does
imply something very
profound!
The EM standing 3-phased hadron (proton or alternate wound neutron)
now easily
noted, so explains `unraveling' back to gamma (pure thought) as called fission,
even
for the net energy of evoked fusion when not confined in a core of
a huge said Nova.
Physics as Astronomy are very near a needed convulsive
awakening, at least for the
tenured who yet believe in billiard balls over
what deBroglie perceived!
The sequence from a hand clap to cosmic bubble to vortex evoked grand
primal quasars
to spew complemental standing waves at right angles (disk
vs. jets) for yet more
degenerative `matter' at all opportunity (in clusters
some 5B years later) defines a prolific
Creator bent on evoking other life
conditions for the likely net purpose of evolution--
mental, more than
Darwinian necessities.
Possibly a recent letter (over) might mean something more.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
CC: One-Hand; Phys/Psy;
cc: Tripp; D/Z w:
6/5/2k
K. Lanzetta, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
State University of New York
Stony Brook, NY 11794
Re: `All Aglow--' indeed!
Dear Sir:
(May 27th, SCIENCE NEWS)
That `huge early burst' is being looked at by the 2dF survey now, after
I suggested the
Zen belief of a hand clapping to get things started out
of the primal magnetic flux-- even
on the many neat 600Mly intervals--
all at once since time didn't then exist as no
mass-for-time did either.
Photons as some `particle' is wrong as refractive index of
magnteic fields
(including variations), the Zeeman affect defines red shift, less on distance,
even if more with UV. the quantized nucleon where compound wound trefoils
now define
the proton or neutron standing EM waves (with a reversed twist),
or the short temporal 2
phased meson that unravels back to pure gamma so
easily-- not to mention some coming
controlled fission/fusion!
Many anomalies have been understood now since Parsons as Sussex reflected
his disdain
at first about Huchra's data and some hand-clapping, but from
past theoretical derivational
examinations-- from Einstein's E side of
his Special Relativity equations as the primal aleph
for all subducted
mass-for-time with standing waves, the only answer was seen. Even our
space-time
derived so oriented bilateral cerebral faculty I predicted in the early
50's has
been amply confirmed-- as expected great psychological anxiety
since!
A copy of a recent letter (over) may aid in perceiving a broader scope
to see the genesis
of the universe-- as unquestionably a very bright beginning,
even if no one was around to
see it as the many cosmic bubble periphery
lit-up with millions of primal quasar vortex to
spew complemental quantized
standing wave `matters' at right angles (due to anti-g) for
primal galaxies
with spin-up radials-- or jet matter for spin-in globular galaxies later.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
cc: One-Hand; Cernicharo letter + Silk (over)
CC: Silk; Frenk; D/Z w:
5/11/2k
W. Evans, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Oxford University
Oxford, UK
Dear Sir: Re:
`Milky Way Looks--'(?) (28 April; SCIENCE)
Maybe the 2dF data will now explain more about primal quasar/galaxy
jet matter
globular clusters as recede from anti-g as are the complemental
anti-EM standing wave
`matter' ejecti with a `spin-down' instead of spin-up
for outer peripheral angular velocity
as called some "Big Kid".
If any dark `matter' exists, it would need to be those open holes in
past centers where
the primal one-handed cosmic claps occurred to evoke
grand bubbles (2dF) for primal
quasar vortex, to then evoke standing wave
matter to buy time! Once theory gets cleared
up, then surveys to define
direction as rate of various cosmic bubble evoked galaxies will
get understood--
even maybe the vast current neurosis of tenured researchers! The
BOOMERANG
data does look good-- assuming those one degree factors is a whole
cosmic
bubble-- on those neat 600Mly intervals!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
cc: One-Hand; Phys/Psy
CC: Wilkinson; Hodge; van den Bergh; Mauskopf; D/Z w:
6/26/2k
E. DeLuca, et. al.
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: anti-matter plum?
Sirs:
(`Model Tracks--'; June 24, SC. NEWS)
Noting the pole ends doing the spewing as some normal Novae, our more
petite kind,
now agitated by planetary gravity to stir up more kinds of
trouble for we locals, may be
defining itself. The ionized matter that
appears to turn our ionosphere almost positive
with its burps would show
anti-matter got this far, even if anti-g would drive it, as jet
matter
from a fusion `processor', away from primal galaxies away as complemental
koinomatter.
While dubious of any net globular masses might be seen out there as
some late sister
amorphous galaxy, the sun's jets might be yet noted during
these more cantankerous
`burping' cycles.
Of interest are the right angled ejecti between complemental matters,
whether created
by primal genetic EMP bubbles or the primal vortex evoked
quasar for a primal galaxy
such as ours?
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
cc: One Hand
CC: Antiochos; Hildner; Gopalswamy; D/Z w:
6/29/2k
G. Dalton, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Oxford
Oxford, U.K.
Re: 2dF survey
Dear Sir:
(`Galaxy Survey--';June 23 SCIENCE)
The confirmations look fine yet few realize that dv/dt dictates wave
front deceleration
thus red shift defining the far side cosmic bubble's
light get shifted down from the
fore-side bubble half. Obviously the `explosion
of the primal hand clapped EMP to
create the bubble would not be seen as
no standing wave electron had yet be formed,
so that decelerating EMP up
to vortex starts would not be seen-- even if possibly
Higgs field `particles'
yet.
If there might be any means to note the spin direction of primal vorticies
as evoke the
primal quasars on those grand EMP bubble's peripheral front,
their common koino vs.
anti-matter kind might be defined-- i.e: contra-rotating
adjacent galaxies somehow
evoking complemental matter for anti-g between
so such spin-up to define relative
standing EM wave `matter' kind.
Interesting would have been to be a mouse attending that `Maxed-Out'
conference,
as even the ignorance yet for `clean' newer jet matter `clusters'
of early kinds of
anti-matter-- evading their primal galaxy's eviction
with anti-g at right angles.
Whether of the major jet or many Novae created
anti-matters above or below a
primal galaxy's disk, complementarity is
the whole game in creation with `condensed
out' standing wave matter from
gamma.
Very Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://www.ktsorg.8m.com --if yet on the web!)
cc: One Hand; Phys/Psy
CC: Weinberg; D/Z w:
5/12/2k
J. Cernicharo, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Consejo Cientificas,
Inst. Estructura de la Materia,
Dept. Fisca Molecular,
Serrano 121, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Re: `Windows Through--'; 28 April SCIENCE
Dear Sir:
The `adjacent jets' (VLA1 and VLA2) of anti-matter (via anti-g), best
defines
complemental created matter-- likely started in the VLA4 primal
quasar/galaxy. Since
the 2dF sky survey data confirms the prediction of
created matter via grand EMPs, so
standing wave `matter' followed to buy
`slow time' for evolution in a universe!
Of interest are the several modes of `condensing' out heavier or larger
quantified standing
wave `atoms' via the use of fission by compression,
the Novae, just as our sun-- now
burping anti-matter from its poles when
stressed by planetary gravitational upset.
Your work is seminal, even if it may take many years for the more tenured
to see it!
Thanks for the fine article!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
cc: One-Hand; Phys/Psy
CC: Noriega-Crespo; D/Z w:
6/29/2k
A. Loeb, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: black hole?
Dear Sir:
(`Black Holes--' June 17, SC. NEWS)
You appear more sympathetic to `alternate scenarios' while the tenure
seekers blunder
on avoiding reality in the article. The 2dF survey (note:
"Galaxy Survey--"; June 23
SCIENCE) now well defines what was predicted
many years ago, below, may help. It
was noted while doing a lengthy study
on `unraveling' standing wave `matter', to regain
the primal cosmic EMP
gamma energy from fission.
The real question looms now about the remaining close-quarters anti-g
phenomena
where standing wave matter is yet being created (electron-positron
annihilations) for
our residual quasar/galaxy core vortex is dying with
its residual energy to help define
the pending ultimate entropy.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://www.ktsorg.8m.com --if yet on the web!)
cc: One Hand; Parsons stm.
CC: Kormendy; D/Z w:
6/25/2k
Baruch S. Blumberg, et. al.
c/o Inst. of Space Studies
and/or Ames Research/Moffett Fld.
NASA Goddard Flight Center
New York, NY 10025
Re: subordinate DNA to mitochondrion
Sirs:
(`-- Extreme Life'; July, Sc. American)
When Sperry's data* confirmed the physics CPT theorem as contingent
to the metal
(psychological) matrix of needed space AND time orientations,
the rectilinear
`knowing' left brain make clear of the operants underlying
the UFO, thus the vast
anxiety in U.S. authority bent on using these `definitive'
seeing/knowing entity, as
offered the fastest then known means for espionage--
within or out of some planet
winner syndrome sufferers.
With the mounting obvious and so many fully aware of the reality of
the said bilateral
subterfuge as physics correlates to unconscious faculty
(most in keeping with Freudian
thought), the past impasse of comprehending
late man's deep neurosis, even over what
our own ancients (Egyptian or
Easter Isle) well knew about what can now be
understood as anti-g, superconductivity
and `twisted' whole quarks (hadrons), to say
nothing of the expedience
of the Top quarks leaving this environment, as anti-matter
jets leaving
primal quasar/galaxies-- for later globular sister galaxies!
Blumberg's left eye (page 30; said Sc. Am. issue) defines his aptitude
to `dig'-- a very
dangerous thing for others that refuse to be under a
tight federal contract to sustain
wanted silence! A vast reckoning is pending,
most via the freed electron's expressing
reality in a digital (verbal)
way for all to comprehend the dire straits we have placed
our stupid conscious
minds into!
A recent letter copy to Scientific American may help define the pending
trauma of
knowing our `deceased' as full govern us for a folly-prone need
for their own mtDNA
survival above entropy, when lacking fatty lipids from
some incarnate. (75%! as just
found)
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; copy ScAm let (over)
CC: D/Z w: subXfile
Biology:
6/14/2k S. L. Miller, et. al,
Dept. of Biogenetics
University of California
San Diego/La Jolla, CA 92093
Re: freed electron; prolife before matter
Dear Sir:
(`Molecule Sparks--' June 3, SC. NEWS)
Between the PNA or even abrupt negative going EEG for REM dream, that
which
knows potentials as uses the freed electron (note EPR experiments),
the left hand of
the electron (Asimov) defines what Heisenberg noted when
escaping the time reversal
paradigm. Once the basis of all physics is understood
via the Einstein Special relativity
equations, complementarity between
the now versus the created (historical) makes
sense, even if evoking so
much terror today in the more reductive left brain dominated
seeking tenure!
Sperry* opened the can of worms when the physics denoted the so needed
complemental dictates throughout mass-time. Biology as now neurophysiology
falls into
line-- maybe to integrate all of the sciences yet haggling over
their many definitudes.
Contingent to fetal split-genetic use, likely only a freed electron
could enact the feat by
knowing things ahead of our slow time-- especially
if some pre-goal with some past
genetic pattern were needed to propagate
a `body' to house those complemental two
space/time oriented faculty between
our ears! So what came before prokaryotes, if not
some semblance of a fundamental
bacteria?
We suspect there will be even something more fundamental than PNA when
mass-time's
matter is but EM standing waves evoked by grand EMP (2dF Sky
Survey) created
quasars for our ensuing slow serial time. After all, what
clapped into existence those
vast EMPs out there on neat 600M light year
intervals? Did ancient Zen know?
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 , and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Phys/Psy; Path IQ; 3-dev
CC: Nielson; D/Z w:
7/12/2k
Editor(s)
New England Journal of Medicine
10 Shattuck St.,
Boston, MA 02115-6094
Re: Vol. 343, No. 1 issue?
Sirs:
Maybe blind for the few libraries I haunt up here in the Manistee
Forests, your No. 1
publication caught my eye to wonder if somehow was
due to Lunberg's vacating
JAMA-- a couple weeks after I sent him there
herewith? Noting long ago
(even for me) McDougal's report (Harvard; circa
1910?) of `mass loss at death' with
what appears as mtDNA `vacating the
area', ensuing studies implies a pending `new
paradigm' of thought, even
with alternate therapies.
With our finite yet fleeting UFO problems, likely working for the Feds
(or maybe visa
versa!), the revulsion towards any quality therapeutic becomes
almost obvious-- yet
defines best the need of our semi-dying-- to feed
their 75% energy (fatty lipids) to
those unseen-- as for unsaid services!
Since the confirmation via Sperry* for the predicted space-time complemental
unconscious CNS structure, all hell has broken loose when mentioned facts
get
claimed as `secret'. As you guys started the provocative way back (I've
yet got
McDougal's report)-- maybe its time to catch up, even examine what
Lumberg is
up to now!
It appears that the late intellectual evoluting mtDNA in the late human
animal has gotten
out-of-hand for its conscious mind (midbrain; RAS), is
buying time with half truths in
desperation, with aid from unseen henchmen
now by our over eating to feed them our
fatty lipids, whatever the net
cost to the human physiology.
I suspect Sheffler's text Mitochondrion will break the bank if it sould
fully get
comprehended by the medical in this society!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://www.ktsorg.8m.com)
** `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; ScAm etc. let; ; 3/dev; Sheffler let
CC: D/Z w:
6/20/2k
Project Censored @ 2000
c/o Sonoma State University
1801 E. Cotati Ave.,
Rohnert Park, CA 94928-3609
Re: yet no 100% cancer therapy with a battery?
Sirs:
(`Project Censored'; June/July NEXUS)
Maybe a Discover cover story is not enough, so we may deserve our vast
cancer death
rate-- to gratify AMA's nice profits while yet playing dumb
of the electrical charge for
pro or anti-life! Maybe it is too simple--
as the seen EEG phase between those same
CNS that occupy our complemental
lateral cerebral hemispheres! (over)
If any finding should have ever been advertised, it was Sperry's,
when his split brain
data* defined the rectilinear left brain, as MUFON
well described the UFO travel,
since the physics well showed a complemental
space vs. time derived mental matrix as
noted in the Special Relativity
equations, demanded by the CPT theorem! My prediction
some dozen years
before Sperry only earned my title of "loose cannon" while doing
aerospace
computer R&D-- thence my kicked in door, cops, FBI, even CIA on a foreign
shore, to define the underlying terror of late authority-- governed by
the yet unseen, who
understand entropy too well so their needs for us as
kept dumb incarnate well being!
The greater value of a dying person than healthy may so underlie the
needs of the medical
professionals, just as the APA's lead in suicide--
when they begin to consciously
understand their schizophrenics whose genius
defines too much about the unconscious!
No doubt Freud saw it clearly when
using `Thanatos' to define the id when we consciously
get too close to
recognizing reality. My few abrupt suicides in some very high IQ people
said enough for me!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://www.ktsorg.8m.com)
* #
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; 3-dev(over)
CC: D/Z w:
6/23/2k
Editor(s), et. al.
Scientific American
415 Madison Ave.,
New York, NY 10017-1111
Re: proteomics sans mitochondrion?
Dear
Sirs:
(July 2k issue)
Since it is mind over matter, the mtDNA should be understood more than
the DNA,
which is merely what Darwin looked for when a physiological body
needed to change
to accommodate the weather! Maybe the `proto'zoon should
be examined in view of
relative evolutional time, as its need for some
prokarotic to eukaryotic DNA `body'
design in which to house itself against
the `elements' of other hungry critters like itself in
another walled cell.
While a fine exercise counting genes in the DNA, that is not "where
its
at" since mitochondrion governs with a mind so uses that body's DNA
`mechanics'
(patterns) to build or modify the physical if no AiR (Autoimmune
Response) for
mutation or a death-wish is promoted. A conditioned dumb
conscious mind is to be
favored whatever is now claimed, but to block any
right brain insight as may help define
subjective reality-- however fear
evoking, even suicide in the higher intellectual as our
esteemed APA professionals!
Darwin may have gone as far in his time as possible to suggest DNA
physiological
control, even mentioning the psychic underlying design to
any nature of some animal.
To replicate his most important finding in the
genome project does not yet touch on the
most important of Nature's goal
of mental evolution in a finite structure as
mitochondrion, however neurotic
today at humanity's late stage of mental evolution.
Because the freed electron evokes some `happening' in our slow relative
time (note
EPR data!), it likely first created the gene, but then assembles
them at conception to be
sure the future physical `specimen' fits the needed
`structure' to house some irascible
`soul'-- or mitochondrion, noting its
ever greater size for evolution in IQ-- since at least
back in the days
of Lucy! That follow-up study of equating what McDougal found at
Harvard
(circa 1910) with weight loss at death, haunts us as we examine Martian
data as ancient Egyptian claim of astral travel using anti-g with a
twisted
(temperature/superconductivity) third quark leg on some hadron.
Without much gluten
left on Mars, their inhabitants may have migrated here,
with no more than mtDNA to
feed on the naive on planet earth-- very secretly
as all UFO travel is now.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://www.ktsorg.8m.com)
cc: Phys/Psy; S-T
CC: Preston; Mayr; D/Z w:
7/9/2k
Immo E. Scheffler, et. al.
Dept. of Genetics
University of California
San Diego, (La Jalla), CA 92093
Re:mtDNA `mass'?
Dear
Sir:
(your fine `Mitochondria')
While yet `plowing through' what to an EE appears obviously a quality
text to be
envied, my also obvious but abstruse inquiry-- based on a lengthy
study into
`psychology' based on physics, some anomalous questions came
to the fore, tersely
indicated in a letter written to Scientific American
(over). In short, to realize the binaries
of genetic import may never define
a mental contingency, yet that underlies the net
behaviors of any animal--
the human one facing some real problems which appear
somewhat answerable
via the split-brain data*-- as said defined in physics.
I hope to end my `wallowing' into your `definitudes' hopefully
soon(!)-- but ask the
most bizarre question facing possibly our real dilemma
of intellectual development,
especially associated with the human covert
manipulation for survival or esteem as the
`win syndrome' now becoming
most irrational in my humble opinion. The nitrogen
predominance
in genetic structure infers its need of historical `program' (genes) thus
accruing behavioral record as might constitute psychological evolution,
whether in the
DNA as used for either the `physical' or mtDNA `psychological',
thus conceivably
contingent to valance or charge-- seen as what the freer
electron might offer. Since
the time reversal paradigm of W. Heisenberg
(sorry!)-- as the ample empirical data of
the EPR experiments as a factor
of `knowing potentials', is now noted as what `uses'
somehow our right
cerebral hemisphere (CQ; creative insight). A can of worms
becomes apparent
as to what indeed `is' the other deductive (sympathetic CNS
`fight/flight)
mental attribute with time orientation so clearly noted using our left
brain?
Since one of my pre-med students said a repeat of McDougal's
bizarre findings of
mass loss at physiological death**, one could ask next
"what got up and left?"-- so the
weird next question of can that `mass'
be defined as possibly mtDNA? I'm at a loss to
suggest any place to where
it might `go', yet some of my students giggle and mention
UFOs, assuming
mass does exist therewith! Your genius should find a way of
repeating McDougal's
work but somehow catching to weigh whatever mass gets up to
leave, via
the breath?
There is data defining a kind of `anti-g' with superconductivity,
thus conceivably
`propulsion' at reduced temperatures with twisted nucleons--
the top quark defining
same most vividly as obviously cannot have the `mass'
claimed from a finite lepton! In
short, cross academic import is looming
enough to beg some mighty curious questions--
thus in part why I struggle
with your erudite text, possibly to define some fool in rags!
Sorry, if
this misses its mark-- or evokes the anxiety of which a few super minds
did very
quickly commit suicide upon pondering.
Maybe Freud was right, to suggest why do our APA professionals
lead in suicide
today? Because it appears obvious that our own left brain
dominance is contingent with
irrational behavior-- one could wonder (if
yet able) what did happen to our midbrain
(RAS) or conscious mind at this
very late hour-- lacking much nuance of conscience?
The now noted female's
often decoupled anterio-corpus callosum says much about an
innate `lobotomy'--
noting Gorman's Time cover story goof of 7/17/95! Did Lucy's
mtDNA get
this whole mess started?
Sincerely, KTS Research (note: http://www.ktsorg.8m.com)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
** Harvard U. circa 1910; published in New England J./Med.
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; 3/dev; Sc.Am. Let. copy CC:
D/Z w:
6/1/2k
E-Mail to: Dr. M. Zimmermann, et.al.
Re: aboriginal disease
Noting what your brother Dave said about your efforts, can there be
seen yet any net
difference between those aboriginal people's diseases
and their life styles (other than
obesity)-- as to whom they turn for psychic
reinforcement or guidance? While likely a
bizarre question, data
now implies the use of right cerebral non-temporal insight may
offer far
more than just creative ideas-- as the guidance T-4 cell in lymphatic control,
a
big factor in the survival of the Australian aborigine, using what they
call their
`dream-time' when seeking game for food. This same parasympathetic
CNS faculty
appears most to offer quality subjective pro-life guidance
for feeding.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA
(No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://www.ktsorg.8m.com)
6/29/2k
F. Zufall, et. al.
Dept. of Neurobiology
University of Maryland
School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD 21217
Re: nose for phermones plus
Dear Sir:
(`Mice have--' june 17th, SC. NEWS)
Since the split-brain data* define the complemental space/time attributes
of the bilateral
CNS with very different aptitudes of sensing as expression,
the `definitive' pheromone
detection might indicate the left brain's greater
attention thus possible associate neuronal
connection. The other `gestalt'
sensing right brain sans serial temporal order might then
sense the environment,
as liabilities in a more subtle way to warn, even of not the
fight-flight
for survival arousal data for the sympathetic faculty.
If indeed the VNO factor, maybe even some nasal laterality, might be
traced (or has
been) for some empiricial data, I would appreciate any contingent
import theretoo. Many
thanks.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://www.ktsorg.8m.com)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ;
CC: Mombaerts; D/Z w:
Neurophysiology:
6/29/2k
F. Zufall, et. al.
Dept. of Neurobiology
University of Maryland
School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD 21217
Re: nose for phermones plus
Dear Sir:
(`Mice have--' june 17th, SC. NEWS)
Since the split-brain data* define the complemental space/time attributes
of the bilateral
CNS with very different aptitudes of sensing as expression,
the `definitive' pheromone
detection might indicate the left brain's greater
attention thus possible associate
neuronal connection. The other `gestalt'
sensing right brain sans serial temporal order
might then sense the environment,
as liabilities in a more subtle way to warn, even of not
the fight-flight
for survival arousal data for the sympathetic faculty.
If indeed the VNO factor, maybe even some nasal laterality, might be
traced (or has
been) for some empiricial data, I would appreciate any contingent
import theretoo. Many
thanks.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://www.ktsorg.8m.com)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ;
CC: Mombaerts; D/Z w:
7/19/2k
E. D. Reichle, et. al.
Dept. of Neuropsychology
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Re: relative `E' availability
Dear Sirs:
(SC. NEWS; July 8th, `Behavior')
Adroit indeed from physics, so why not deduce the obvious?
After scanning several research people there at C-Mellon U., with their
relative
`interests' only back ten years (below), suspicion prevails as
to how many suicides
occurred, especially of the APA ilk doing such studies?
If none, a recent inquiry
herewith could evoke more curiosity at this late
hour. Somehow, those with the greater
winner syndromes in life find the
power to govern, but as their governed, never manage
to find out
what governs themselves as do the governing-- especially when called secret
today!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
cc: D/Z w:
6/14/2k
B. Litt, et. al.
Dept. of Neurophysiology
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Re: brain stem EEGs?
Dear Sir:
(`Endgame--' June 3, SCIENCE NEWS)
While likely bizarre, the predicted space vs. time so oriented complemental
CNS,
when confirmed by Sperry* not only raised some eyebrows but consternation
amongst
Federal people upon giving a terse paper in Europe in the late
60's, likely due to
classified work on special computers for aerospace
done at that time. The so implied
need of such complemental `servo-loop'
for the like human conscious awareness, made
clear that whatever drove
the lateral two brain halves as possibly the pons or lower
spinal cord
was in some innate way associated with Einstein's Aleph end-points seen
in
his Special Relativity equation, a provocative import at that time,
yet evoking anxiety in
several fields of investigation.
Noting the EEG phase to net aptitude of lateral cerebral function also
fit the relative time
dichotomy, the temporal (rhythmic) vs. `immediate'
(non-slope) half cycle associated
with visual inputs or REM dream further
confirmed the physics anomaly to goad an
investigation into relative time
as the basis of mental processing, depending on which
said Aleph dictated
conscious awareness. Persistent left brain's rhythmic epileptic drive
with
historical deductive serial mental operants, as the typical binary computer,
evoked
the question of its complemental of not only the spatial aptitude
but non-serial-temporal,
much as noted by the Australian aboriginal's `dream
time' use of prognosing game in the
future tense, as spatial `place' implied
the profound as contingent to creative insight, to
say little of REM dream
of which Freud examined quite carefully, even the weird
`revulsive' Thanatos
anomaly as may be the genesis of the epileptic response to the
unwanted.
Noting the left cerebral removal yet return to some `normalcy' as Sperry
found, the
regained RAS (midbrain) conscious control over serial temporal
life redefined the
physic's prognosis of mind in some way over matter in
relative time, was the key to
unconscious `union' or integration, to explain
both Freud and neurophysiology
together, thus a possible means to block
or enhance (sans neuro-transmitter adjuvant
intervention), yet the likely
brain-stem net connections to define what as where to so
decouple the irascible.
While the said deeper anxiety was noted in the religious (Darwin syndrome?)
or the
more ominous by our Federal government where rectilinear `knowing'
of the left brain
and associated correlates to UFO displacement (note `83
MUFON!), there may be
more reasons for a far greater anxiety in a kept
very dumb public today.
With the more finite NMRs, etc.-- it may now be possible to perceive
the finite rhythmic
excitation point to ablate same to more easily `decouple'
the irascible than a whole half
cerebral hemisphere, albeit a new lobotomy
using more finesse than an ice-pick!
Hope this is some food for thought as could be the right time-- before
our fight-flight left
brain user sympathetic CNS blows us all off of this
planet!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 , and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; 3/dev; S-T
CC: Spencer; Lowenstein; D/Z w:
Physics:
6/24/2k
C. L. Smith, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University College of London
London, UK
Re: `Large Hadron--' July, SC. AM.
Dear Sir:
Indeed these are exciting days in view of the 2dF data also, as defines
the grand `hand
claps' in cosmic bubbles to evoke grand EMPs for subsequent
vortex for quasars to
`degenerate' standing wave `matter'! CERN may have
a potent `machine' but none like
the Apriori-- especially as all those
Big Bangs on neat 600Mly intervals were done all
at once, especially when
c was infinite, lacking a dense magnetic field to hamper that
velocity.
It was Einstein asking about the Michelson Morley test the correct question
about the ether being pulled along with our iron core!
The pressure now is on as John Bell reflected to me just before he died,
does the
electron and positron have anti-g between, thus explains the jet
matter from primal
quasar cores-- as even their globular late blooming
accruing sister cluster galaxies?
Below are a few past letter copies to better define my original theory
as defined the
said jets well before the Einstein Observatory went aloft
to prove their existence.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
CC: One-Hand; Phys/Psy;
cc: D/Z w:
COPY:
3/19/2k
Reinhard Stock, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Frankfurt
Frankfurt, Germany
Re: `FIREBALLS'(?)
Dear Sir:
(April SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN p.16>)
6/17/2k
R. Y. Chiao, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Berkeley CA 94720
Re: red shift
Dear Sir:
(`Light Pulses--' June 10, SC. NEWS)
Light waves evoke their own impediment with peaks of denser magnetic
fields (no
quantized photons) so their long distance travel evokes the
most red shift, assuming no
magnetic matter like stars exist along the
path as most distort EM waves, as well noted
with the Zeeman affect. Sadly
Einstein didn't recognize the Michelson Morley
experiment more clearly,
even if he did ask adroitly if the `ether' was somehow being
"pulled along"
with this planet-- filled of a ferrous material!
Soon it will be recognized that `all' is EM standing waves, made by
a `clapped hand'
on neat 600Mly intervals across this universe (note: 2dF
survey; even in same
SCIENCE NEWS albeit ambiguously), but huge EMPs to
evoke quasar vortex on
grand said bubbles to invoke `mass' for slow time,
even complemental gravity for
anti-matter jets for globular sister galaxies
from a primal galaxy as ours. We suspect
tenure time has about run out,
thus some scary days ahead for most of the claimed
`sciences' now.
To define c may be better as the `now' in terms of the E side of the
Special Relativity
equation, as denser magnetic fields became the genesis
of quantized `matter', as well
as the said decelleration factor ,that primal
velocity shifting so well noted around the
higher magnetic stars along
the way-- no black holes. Sorry.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
PS: note my past letter of 7/11/94; R. Y. Chiao, P. G. Kwiat and
A. M. Steinberg, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: "Faster-than--"; 7/2/94 SC.NEWS)
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Nimtz; Steinberg; D/Z w:
Psychology:
6/5/2k
C. H. Zeanah, et. al.
Dept. of Psychology
Tulane School of Medicine
Tulane University
New Orleans, LA 70118
Re: neither defense nor violence (?)
Dear Sir:
(`Attachment--'; May 27, SC. NEWS)
To lack fight-flight or sympathetic CNS left cerebral dominance, thus
little active
reductive (IQ) reasoning could explain most of the depressive
history as evokes the
de-tachment `disorder', even if disorder stems from
active fight flight behavior in reality.
The whole sad phenomena does suggest however the active friendship with
whomever--
as using the right brain input, assuming a fully integrated
anterio-corpus callosum for
some insight into consciousness (RAS; Midbrain)
to possibly sense who not to get
friendly with, if truly dangerous!
The bilateral space-time awareness as Sperry found* well defines our
subjective reality--
even insight for genius and conscience-- so lacking
in the more manipulative intellectual--
to say little of APA's lead in
overt suicide as Freud clearly pointed out. My few abrupt
suicides said
more than I care to repeat when defining the unconscious in more empirical
terms!
Some current work with youngsters on 5HT re-uptake adjuvants with defining
the
unconscious matrix is turning around a few, to say little of their
enthusiasm to learn more,
so I'm beginning to now suspect academia's rote
programming as part of their problem!
The Australian aborigine using their
`dream-time' as likely the above attachment disorder
(noting EEGs), may
permit them to escape the facade of social `order'-- which is anything
but benign today.
Interesting would be a gender study to find when the female, when lacking
parent-figure
stimulation, looses her bilateral anterior connection, as
so prevalent in western society yet
not Mongolian? (note over)
Sincerely,
KTS Research 49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; Gorman let.(over)
CC: O'Connor; D/Z w:
7/19/2k
E. D. Reichle, et. al.
Dept. of Neuropsychology
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Re: relative `E' availability
Dear Sirs:
(SC. NEWS; July 8th, `Behavior')
Adroit indeed from physics, so why not deduce the obvious?
After scanning several research people there at C-Mellon U., with their
relative
`interests' only back ten years (below), suspicion prevails as
to how many suicides
occurred, especially of the APA ilk doing such studies?
If none, a recent inquiry
herewith could evoke more curiosity at this late
hour. Somehow, those with the greater
winner syndromes in life find the
power to govern, but as their governed, never manage
to find out
what governs themselves as do the governing-- especially when called secret
today!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
cc: D/Z w:
5/19/2k
Raj Persaud, et. al.
Maudsley Hospital and
Inst. of Psychiatry
London SE5 8AF, UK
Re: depression
Dear Sir: (12
May SCIENCE; Science's Compass; letters)
Young women indeed-- albeit overt suicide in the more intellectual male
as likely
perceives reality subjectively. (Freud!) The anomaly of APA (Psychiatric)
lead in
suicide of all professionals says much to this yet apparent enigma
of left cerebral
Thanatos!
The net `insulating' effect of a semi lobotomy (decoupled fore-brain
corpus callosum)
allows for much subjective folly to ensue, yet the mtDNA
bias in a female likely prevents
overt abdication. To pacify the unhappy
left cerebral id with a neuroleptic
chemo-lobotomy-- to evade the right
brain's non-temporal insight offer
(superconscious for conscience), better
defines all late academic programming efforts,
especially using Ritalin
for more censoring 5HT, to yet evade any cross academic
import. Our late
dumbed down state for automatons to run point says much about
who now governs
whom we only think governs us. The proof is seen with an official
ego-maniac
trying to duplicate the ancient Egyptians on TV. Ach!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
CC: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy;
cc: Kessler; Montgomery; Olney; D/Z w:
6/17/2k
A. Hejmadi, et. al.
Dept. of Psychology
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Re: `Dancing--' (June 10, SC. NEWS)
Dear Sir:
Maybe `seeing' would better define the ability to `perceive' the subtle
in others,
especially as the right brain dominant might so much better
`recognize'-- noting the
space oriented Australian aboriginal using their
`dream time' while yet fully awake!
Your data defining the western neurotic
mind, as semi-lobotomized, to realize only
what the left brain allows,
to show American women's best survival means with only
sycophantic promises
or some political intrigue, well defined by a cover story* some
time ago.
A study with a UCLA BIS grant after defining the two complemental space/time
bilateral cerebral faculty from physics in the late 60's but on bilateral
smile
dichotomies** stirred up much resentment-- which defined the anomalous
academic
programming of only the reductive time oriented left cerebral
hemisphere. This
mounting empirical obvious would fit your findings well,
especially by noting the right
brain use of the hindu as said aboriginal.
As Sperry*** amply confirmed my physics predictions some years before,
some
abrupt suicides occurred before I fully understood what Freud perceived,
unquestionably the coming need of all to comprehend soon,, especially in
the fields of
psychology.
Hopefully this evokes more interest than anxiety-- in view the lead
in suicide of
American APA professionals!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://www.ktsorg.8m.com)
** Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90, p.12 ***`The
Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67-- and
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; S-T; * Gor/let copy (over)
cc: D/Z w:
7/13/2k
N. Etkoff, et. al.
Dept. of Psychoneurophysiology
Mass. Gen. Hospital East,
Charlestown, MA 0213?
Re: right brain aphasics
Dear Dr. Etkoff:
(Aug. DISCOVER; `--Lie Detectors'
Not only does the non-temporal* know spatial qualities but finite within
space-- noting
the Australian aboriginals. Whether called insight for conscience
or perceptive skills
somewhat better than the more `tactile' and verbal--
most prevaricating to `win', the
physics explains it all-- albeit a bit
beyond other scientific fields of `finite' perusal! The
real trauma coming
is when the bilateral smile becomes understood, as the neurotic, too
often
as left brain dominants in some established authorized authority!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; Gor-let (over)
CC: D/Z w:
6/27/2k
Dr. M. E. Chafetz, Pres. et. al.
2600 Virginia Ave. NW, Ste. 502,
Washington, DC 20037
Re: Diane Rehm's `alcohol' program
Dear Sir:
(`Authority of Experts'-- indeed!)
Revealing was the discussion contingent to ethanol use-- but most by
the
psychoanalytical means of voice stress as worded jargon so elegantly
noted today. The
terror of finding our `self' underlies most of not all
of our vast neurosis leading to maybe
a net good, of thinning our very
sick animal specie with too much IQ now.
Much as using a 5HT enhancer (Ritalin) to slow the kids down to get
programmed into
official ritual (for the State), we can see a vast folly
underway to squelch any further use
of CQ but for IQ, to do some same dull
round until dead-- as run point for the few
`elitized' who want to win
the planet-- by hook or by crook!
From my extensive physics to neurophysiology-- via aerospace
computer R&D back
50 years ago, the split-brain data defines our huge
enigma-- as the left cerebral
neurosis defining the root of our dilemma--
I suspect you might perceived. Assuming
you are versed in some of the bilateral
cerebral anomalies*, the decoupled anterio
corpus callosum (auto lobotomy)
so well noted in the more intellectual female**, the
diffeence between
insight use for genius and redundant parroting for credentialized
`experts'
shows where we are headed!
A few past `booze' quips below-- indicating my one beer a day as sympatholytic
has
defied any further chest pains-- and I fully consciously suspect a
far more perception
(spatial insight usage) to wade through the cross academic
data needed to continue
my studies-- now 73 years ancient. Sorry for my
tirade but I have over earned it.
(note 5th Generation--' fiasco; herewith)
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://www.ktsorg.8m.com)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
** Gor-let (copy herewith)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; 3/dev(over); **
CC: D/Z w:
5/19/2k
Raj Persaud, et. al.
Maudsley Hospital and
Inst. of Psychiatry
London SE5 8AF, UK
Re: depression
Dear Sir: (12
May SCIENCE; Science's Compass; letters)
Young women indeed-- albeit overt suicide in the more intellectual male
as likely
perceives reality subjectively. (Freud!) The anomaly of APA (Psychiatric)
lead in
suicide of all professionals says much to this yet apparent enigma
of left cerebral
Thanatos!
The net `insulating' effect of a semi lobotomy (decoupled fore-brain
corpus callosum)
allows for much subjective folly to ensue, yet the mtDNA
bias in a female likely
prevents overt abdication. To pacify the unhappy
left cerebral id with a neuroleptic
chemo-lobotomy-- to evade the right
brain's non-temporal insight offer
(superconscious for conscience), better
defines all late academic programming efforts,
especially using Ritalin
for more censoring 5HT, to yet evade any cross academic
import. Our late
dumbed down state for automatons to run point says much about who
now governs
whom we only think governs us. The proof is seen with an official
ego-maniac
trying to duplicate the ancient Egyptians on TV. Ach!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
CC: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy;
cc: Kessler; Montgomery; Olney; D/Z w:
end/5/5/2k BB letters compiled