3-2k-physics:
4/8/2k
J. Penner-Hahn, et. al.
Dept. of Chemistry
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
                         Re: chopped quanta for wave bursts
Dear Sir:                (`X-ray Pulses--' march 24th SCIENCE)

The ALS data may define a way to examine the finitely small, but if all `matter' is but EM
standing waves as it now appears, what part of any quantized hadron (or lepton) does one
`see'. Worse, if the `3-phased' whole quark trefoil of three leptons (2 of one wound state
as koinomatter, the other complemental) so little rational `reflected' import via X-ray
viewing might be had.

In short, if all were yet `billiard balls', the chopping of light to view `innateness' might be
of some empirical use.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

(No further `.com' lines here. Note:  http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: Big-Bang + (copy: Grinspoon's letter, over)
CC: D/Z w:
3/2k/phy.bb

4/8/2k
Von Baeyer, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
College of Wm. & Mary
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187
                         Re: Treiman
Dear Sir:                (17th March SCIENCE; `Quantum--')

Well said! Along with J. Wheeler, I found anxiety lurking with my pointing to the
space-time split-brain data-- yet Heisenberg got so excited he almost missed his plane,
while we yet talked on the street! The many student microphones there implied that
meeting may have went well after all-- back in the early '70s!

Any `odd quantum' now merely reflects a deep academic neurosis, much as Beller defined
in Greenberger's book review. (24th March) Oddly enough, much subtle `refutations' were
noted therein!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
   (No further `.com' lines here. Note:  http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: Big Bang+ (copy; Grinspoon, over)
CC: D/Z w:
 

3/19/2k
Reinhard Stock, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Frankfurt
Frankfurt, Germany

                         Re: `FIREBALLS'(?)
Dear Sir:                (April SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN p.16>)

 Freezing back-out decoupled leptons prewound as third harmonic EM standing waves
should be expected if indeed fully unraveled. No doubt the 1,600 `particles' comes close,
if only two Pb atoms got fully unraveled since calculates to 1,418. An isotope might have
been the variable if indeed the count could be done accurately!

While dubious of 10 microseconds for a primal quasar to generate mass that fast from a
primal cosmic bubble EMP (our own yet spewing complementals for disk and jet
antimatters) the real question outstanding is how as Who clapped into existence those
primal EMP on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe. (see Huchra walls as the 2dF
astronomical data)

Interesting are the bifurcated spewed leptons defining the noted anti-g factor in the CERN
data.  Maybe a correlation can be made to the TOP quark's claimed acceleration (called
high mass), that I had hoped John Bell would have examined some time ago. He did
perceive the dichotomy between my suspected complemental matter needs so also wanted
to examine their net anti-g affects at CERN.

In short, returned 3-phased (trefoil wound) whole quarks is to unravel them back to their
primal a-priori gamma state but of less so in complemental single electron leptons. (even
if most started in Novae). A pacifying neutron, to best satisfy adjacent proton hadrons of
complemental `wind' defines the stability of atoms without isotopic states, as offer stable
orbitals for electron single leptons. The extra accrued energy from a Nova likely added
the impetus for 3-phase `wrap' then called the hadron.  Of course the relative wrap
(phasing) defining koino/anti matters.

The CERN data is indeed exciting even if somewhat late in coming.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; One-Hand+;
CC: U. Heinz; L. Kluberg;  D/Z w:
 

3/8/3k
B. Sadoulet, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720
                        Re: partial EM standing wave WIMP factor
Dear Sir:                (Science News; Feb. 26th)

With string theory better defining what quasars create for matter to buy time, we get
fooled in believing that some don't evaporate sooner as didn't incorporate enough E to
close their net standing wave status, called electrons or their 3-phased whole quark
configurations. At least their entropic state, as re-twisted third phase leg for
superconductivity or anti-g phenomena will shake up physics for some real tenure buying
by voting to settle the next half baked truth for some scientific `fact'. So we find science
doing as its political thing, buying time for tenure so survival, at some grand tax expense
upon the kept dumb programmed. (over){or just keeping us in the dark so they can
continue getting richer}

Sincerely,

KTS Research
 (No further `.com' lines here.)
 Note:  http://kts.org.gq.nu

cc:Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; One-Hand; Sproull let.(over)
CC: Lewin; Bernabie; D/Z w:
 

4/1/2k
J. Orenstein, et. al.,
Dept. of Physics
University of California,
Berkeley, CA 9470
                              Re: `Advances--' (21 April SCIENCE)
Dear Sir:

`Zeroing in' indeed-- when transition elements are tweakable with temperature changes
{differences}for untwisting a whole quark's standing wave for a retwisted orbital! Since
time is also temperature inversely when a standing trefoiled wave gets slowed down, we
find the well known phenomena in freezing water{causing water to expand} yet ignored
for tweaked magnetic fields dependent upon some finite generated magnetic field. No
doubt many things will be seen now, the more valuable controlled fission as goaded to
return said standing waves to their a priori to offer us gamma in the process, but evoked
anti-g for travel!

More trauma evoking is the interface between a freed electron and slow mass-time where
a binary import can define reality, even in words-- {AI}such Patent duly terminated in
panic many years ago. As Heisenberg well saw the anomaly, few tried to define any
Apriori beyond the many positive EPR experiments since.

Your article was indeed adroit so may define reality enough to so evoke this government's
grand trauma-- yet help us all get over the now vast neurosis of knowing the really
profound, to say very little about what (or who) bothers us also in panic now!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

  (No further `.com' lines here. Note:  http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: Phys/Psy; Big Bang; Path/IQ
CC: Millis; Kastner; Nellis; D/Z  w:
 

4/30/2k
Wm. J. Nellis, et. al. Dept. of Physics
Livermore Natl. Labs
Livermore, CA 9
                         Re: Metallic H
Dear Sir:                (`Making Metallic--' May, SC. AMERICAN)

With great interest your data implicates EM standing wave matter all the more! Even the
twisting whole 3-phased quark (3-leptons) to re-orient magnetic vortex for better aligned
orbitals to free- up single leptons (electrons) for conduction ease.

The question now is the complemental neutron to proton trefoil configuration to integrate
with an enhanced net orbital(s)? Since neutrons here within a koinomatter environment
unravel easily (as a 2-phase meson), the self annihilating complemental leptons go back
to gamma to define their origin!  Now that the Anglo-Australian 2dF Sky Survey data
defines the cosmic EMPs on neat 600Bly intervals for ensuing quasar/galaxy-- as
precipitates standing EM wave `matter'-- it makes clear far more our bungling with
`billiard-balls' to avoid deBroglie so long ago thus the approaching obvious
of our primal `genetic' origen.

Suspicion now could rest on the finesse needed to orient freed D in trajectory to nudge off
a neutron's quark `electron' to allow its two complementals to fisel for controlled heat
applications?

Sincerely,

KTS Research

 (No further `.com' lines here. Note:  http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: Phys/Psy; Big-Bang
CC: Kastner; cert/card; D/Z w:
 

4/6/2k
R. Montgomery, et. al.
Dept. of Mathematics
U. of California, Sanata Cruz
Santa Cruz, CA 9
                              Re: 3-body system
Dear Sirs:              (`ORBITING--' Sciences News, April 1st)

Gravity, electro statics or magnetics could be the same, as what may be the `whole quark'
(hadron) spinning in a 3-phased configuration, suspected to be a trefoil. {friction from the
unlike mater causing an “electrostatic” attraction} Whether a proton or re-twisted neutron
for a common nucleon's electron orbital vortex, each lepton segment would be merely a
petite magnetic EMP field front, much as its grand progenitor EMP now defined as some
black hole which existed on neat 600Bly intervals. (note 2dF Austalian Sky Survey data)
Our predictions of quantized EM `matter' based on de Broglies' work concluded the need
to quantify the base universal magnetic flux as appeared obvious that the E side of
Einstein's Special Relativity had to `precipitate' into EM standing waves as the a priori for
temporal matter of mc\2.

With some likely complex confluence of net forces, the compound wound yet simple
electron (as complemental positron with opposite wind for anti-force affects, noting
primal quasar jet matter), as being the root matter, becomes compounded with absorbed
energy to create the hadron via the said 3-phased state. The net ease of unraveling to offer
gamma energy (fission) made quite clear all of the above.

From your work we wonder if the figure `8' can be compressed into a trefoil, whether free
of external influences or within some net milieu of other adjacent force-fields?

Sincerely,

KTS Research
     (No further `.com' lines here. Note:  http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: Big-Bang
CC: Chenciner; Buck; Simo; D/Z w:
 

4/8/2k
A. J. Lazarus, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
MIT, Rm. 37-687
Cambridge, MA 02139
                         Re: ion nadir for reversal?
Dear Sir:            (`Day the Solar Wind--' 24 March SCIENCE)

One might wonder of the 11 year solar cycle also has a relative ion polarity shift detected
here, to reflect pole ejecti of what now appears as anti-matter? The stirred `burps' of a
petite nova could become dangerous if the galaxy's magnetic field orientation didn't steer
(as the primal jets) such matter at right angles.

Any referential data to cyclic epochs of ion net charges noted on earth would be
appreciated.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

   (No further `.com' lines here. Note:  http://kts.org.gq.nu)

CC: Big-Bang+
cc: D/Z w:
 

3/31/2k
N. Gehrels, et.al.
NASA; Goddard Flight Center
Greenbelt, MD 20771
                         Re: Gould belt as gamma source? Dear Sir:                (`Craft Spies--'
March 25,
Science News)

   The complemental nature of galactic `matter' now noted as EM standing waves indicate
a 45 degree vector there-between, such primal magnetic field possible having something
to do with the Gould belt of active gamma source stars. There may be some net `shear
affect' between complemental magnetic fields if agitated-- that might evoke potent
gamma radiation, a theory stemming from the now seen apparent fact of grand EMP
cosmic generated bubbles (2dF sky survey) on neat 600Bly intervals across the universe.
   While bizarre yet in physics as deny the net anti-g factor between complemental
`wound' standing wave-front `matter', enigmas like high velocity quasar/galaxy jet matter
continues to baffle-- as unseen `hand claps' called black holes somehow.
   We will watch with greater interest now the Compton+ data!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
  (No further `.com' lines here, sorry.)
  (Note:  http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: One-Hand
CC: I. Grenier; D/Z w:
 

3/4/2k
A. Frank, et.al.
Dept. of Astrophysics
Rochester University
Rochester, N.Y. 14627
                         Re: Inverse quasar for Novae
Dear Sir:                (April Astronomy; `Busting--'

The complemental spatial or matter dichotomy, whether during EM standing wave
`matter' creation in a quasar core or a future Nova compiling, best defines what the 2dF
survey has shown as the real genesis of definitive space slow time via cosmic EMPs. The
complemental spewed anti-matter jets from primal quasar galaxies (not globular as from
that jet matter) makes clear the genesis of any quantified `matter' as said EM standing
waves, now best defined in the string theory in physics.  Oddly, all forces then becomes a
factor of the compound finite wound standing waves we yet call `billiard balls' yet,
sustaining tenure in ignorance in most our scientific thought. Our predictions many
years ago of anti-g with anti-matter with the Einstein observatory aloft evidence made too
clear the neurosis in most of modern science. Bohr's refutation of Einstein's supposition
of complemental gravity was the real blunder in all of science and so we pay dearly for it
yet!

Since Huchra the obvious was seen, thus likely our impetus to get the British to move on
2dF, thus the adroit `Busting the Bubbles' article in the current April Astronomy
publication.

We suspect that N. Soker is close, so needs attention now as the empirical obvious to
what `matter' truly is, becomes understood.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: One-Hand; Big Bang; Phys/Psy; Path/Psy; Livio let copy
CC: Astronomy; D/Z w:
 

3/31/2k
Christian Enss, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Heidelberg,
Heidelberg, Germany
                         Re: Boron's twist
Dear Sir:                (`Glass--' Science News, March 4th)

Unique indeed is your data! As copper oxide, but inversely with a `hole' (`negative'
valence), again the temperature twist on the 3-phased whole quark (hadron) to re-align a
major orbital vortex makes clear far more the anomaly of EM standing waves, as called
`billiard ball' matter yet today.

Once the nuclei loses control, to liberate `bose' electrons from aligned orbitals,
superconductivity remains no anomaly, even some complemental g-field noted with the
Top quark with an unbelievable `mass' equated from high acceleration as the primal
quasar spewed anti-matter jets. Oddly, the same Science News page shows the galaxy
anomaly very clearly, for jet matter globular second-stage galaxy creation at right angles
to their primal galaxy!

With the 2dF data confirming our theory of `genetic' EMPs for the neat 600Bly cosmic
bubbles, the `degeneration' into finite standing waves as complemental electrons on up
(most then in Novae), a clear picture now looms for bamboozled physics, as de Broglie
did perceive clearly-- as many others like Faraday, between quantized first-phased'
electrons and the magnetic field `a priori'.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Phys/Psy; One Hand;
CC: Osheroff; Kettemann; Welch;  D/Z w:
 

4/7/2k
D. Grinspoon, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
SW Research Inst.
6220 Culebra Rd., Drawer 28510
San Antonio, TX 78228-0510
                              Re: Science wars
Dear Sir:                     (May Astronomy `SETI--;)

An adroit series of statements-- but no time to rock the boat as long as our programmed
left brain with IQ governs late humanity! It has reasons that we conscious minds (RAS;
midbrain) best not probe just yet, as rectilinear (definitive space)* as UFO travel might
imply something diabolical in a government's need in speedy liaison work, better called
espionage-- but for a very ugly fee!  Indeed, the question boils down to which cerebral
hemisphere does not want defined reality,, as what for, but never said reason! It smacks of
Freud's opinion that the unconscious "wills to remain UNconscious", noting our APA
professional's lead in suicide after getting too close the the empirical bilateral dichotomy
of their schizoid `patients'!

As the 2dF data show, the primal EMPs for cosmic bubble creation with subsequent huge
`bubbles' (Huchra) on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe says much as about their
quasar creation for standing wave EM `matter' to buy time for evolution, yet such IQ
evolution leads to the vast neurosis-- like how could the past Egyptians know about
evoked anti-g to teleport huge masses-- to suggest the Top quark's `believed' mass, or the
acceleration of a primal quasar's jet matters (or burping novae) at right angles to its
complemental koinomatter! Jupiter's tidal cycles stirring our sun has its liability on 11
year cycles, so we can be thankful it spews its positrons from its poles-- around here!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
  (No further `.com' lines here. Note:  http://kts.org.gq.nu)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67  and:
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Clapped Hand; Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Ast.Ed.; D/Z  w:
 

2/28/2k
P. Busquin, et. al.
 c/o R. Prodi, EU
The European Parliament
                              Re: The 5th Framework
                              (July 16th '99 SCIENCE)
Sirs:

From the now clear imports of bilateral cerebral anomalies within the human brain and
the apparent misdeed of `programming' IQ over CQ via academic ritual, the sciences
suffer most as lack those so few using right brain visual import as offer insights to yet not
perceived reality. To avoid blunders (note Einstein!) it is the perception of underlying
reality, much not oddly that Freud noted in the `royal road' of subjective visual
experience. It is likely that the Oriental female's greater use of her anterio-corpus
callosum, may even foster a husband's effort to teach her children insight use-- to define
that races' better `idea' ability as curiosity over Western men today-- whatever their
ducation.

Some recent Japanese work* appears to indicate the key to anterio corpus callosum
integrative ability for CQ (Creative Quotient) so crucial for initial perception of long held
enigmas, the not seen EM standing wave (string theory) which now defines all
complemental "matter" as precipitated by quasars-- as they from grand EMPs on neat
600Bly intervals across thus universe. The recent data as discloses gamma as the a priori
of quantized `matter', CERN's SPS,indicates the reverse of what the said quasar evoked!
Even the so suspected anti-g between complemental matters is being clearly noted, which
allowed for our predicted jets, well before the Einstein observatory went aloft to
photograph same on a near galaxy.

Not only was Einstein's "blunder" correct but also was Bohr's in rejecting Einstein's
suspicion of complemental forces in all ways as gravity, the most crucial now for the
study of astronomy. Even the 2dF data may confirm the anomalous Zen "one-hand
clapping"!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
  (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

* `Callosal Window Between--' p.814; 7, Aug.`99 SCIENCE

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; S-T; One-Hand
CC: D/Z  w:
 

2/27/2k
B. Burke  et. al.
Dept. of Radio Astronomy
Mass. Inst. Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139
                       Re: `Secrets by Radio--' quasar `black-                   hole' matter genetic
cores;
(SCIENCE 18 Feb.)
Dear Sir:

Closer scrutiny of the quasar core will define two kinds of `matter' (EM standing waves)
evolving therefrom with anti-g between to define the jets spewing at right angles to the
primal disk. Thus any `black hole' that sucks, truly does `suck' in the sense that it is false
because the said anti-g between two complemental EM standing waves that we call
`matter'-- from within our finite spaced (point of view) slow temporal quantal state.

The 2dF data defines the true primal `bangs', likely millions of them on neat 600Bly
intervals across this universe, but the means to evoke its peripheral collapsing EMP wave
for quasar cores. The result evoking standing wave `matter' with complemental kind, so
anti-g there-between, noted so far via top quark `expedition', not an assumed greater mass
hadron albeit likely an anti-lepton.  Once recognizing the `3-phased' whole quark
(hadrons) with one leg phase reversed to make compatible for the stable nucleon, we will
also perceive their genesis as the primal lepton as gamma, derived from finite collapsing
EMP fronts on cosmic bubbles.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
  (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

CC: Big Bang; One Hand; Path/IQ
cc: Junor; Zhang; D/Z w:
 

4/3/2k
Bob Berman
c/o Astronomy
21027 Waukeshaw
Waukeshaw, Wisc. 53187
                         Re: Faraday's question (EM flux)
Dear Sir:                (bubbleland; June 2K article)

Strange indeed was what Faraday said, but got to the point when suggesting some a priori
underlying the phenomena of magnetism for `quantized' electricity, now seen as EM
standing waves in our slow time.

Since Freud pointed to why our APA professionals lead in suicide, I'll only suggest Zen's
`one hand clapping' (within Its own fundamental `element') for you to guess what a REAL
`fluctuation' might be-- and then on even as neat 600Bly intervals for a truly BIG bang--
all over the place at once when time didn't exist!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

 (No further `.com' lines here.   Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
 

4/13/2k
G. Basri, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720
                         Re: Brown Dwarfs (Scientific American)
Dear Sirs:
 

With the mounting evidence that this primal galaxy's jet (anti-) matters as spewed with
anti-g at right angles could with their common gravity form globular clusters thus stars as
brown dwarfs. Searching for them should be easy, especially after noting them nearby-- as
right angle spin galaxy cluster only 400ly away. The time of 50 million years may define
their relative `newness' due to the spew travel time of the said jet matter, all well within
both Keck systems of observational stance.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

 (No further `.com' lines here. Note:  http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: Big-Bang+
CC: Stauffer; Martin; D/Z w:

With the mounting evidence that this primal galaxy's jet (anti-) matters as spewed with
anti-g at right angles could with their common gravity form globular clusters thus stars as
brown dwarfs. Searching for them should be easy, especially after noting them nearby-- as
right angle spin galaxy cluster only 400ly away. The time of 50 million years may define
their relative `newness' due to the spew travel time of the said jet matter, all well within
both Keck systems of observational stance.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

 (No further `.com' lines here. Note:  http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: Big-Bang+
CC: Stauffer; Martin; D/Z w:
 

4/29/2k
Philip W. Anderson, et.al.
 Joseph Henry Labs of Physics
Princeton, University
Princeton, NJ 08544
                         Re: `protectorate'(?)
Dear Sir:                (`Sources--' p.480 21 April SCIENCE)

Pointing back some years (over) to a letter* to you indicating the genesis of `matter' (EM
standing waves) via cosmic EMP evoked bubbles, it might be timely to examine the
whole quark's 3 phased trefoil of leptons for hadrons in relative time/temperature where
`warp' decouples an innate magnetic vortex to re-align electron flow via shifted orbitals.

Since confirmed with the Einstein aloft image of another galaxy's predicted jets of
anti-matter ejecti via anti-g, such did as what we hoped John Bell would have done before
his untimely death. The steady mounting obvious between astronomy and physics makes
us suspect there is going to be some `theory' changes soon.

Sincerely, (again)
 KTS Research

* Big Bang+; '92 letter (over)
CC: D/Z w:

 (No further `.com' lines here. Note:  http://kts.org.gq.nu)