4/19/2k
G. Weisfeld, et. el.
Dept. of Psychology(?),
Detroit U.
Detroit, MI 48221
Re: lateral smile
Dear Sir:
(`- to be Boss'; May Discover)
While sad, the empirical data still gets avoided, to realize what the
insightive use to trust
or warn them of another's penchants-- by glancing at their bilateral
smile. In
psychoanalytical jargon, the left smiler sees far more in the social
milieu than the right
grinning, who too often `need' others but is never said overtly.
Hawley's using games to see our gaming best defines the political promises
now, to say
little of their real unsaid venture in life. The tragedy as noted with
APA's lead in suicide,
when they begin to consciously realize their sad `charges' jerking
their way into oblivion
with some neuroleptic to keep them `censored'-- so happy by not kicking
and screaming
about being visually informed, could define the hideous at best today--
yet oddly should
be expected!
Conniff's fine article exposes far more than what many will see at this
late hour where
what governs mankind is not only his left cerebral hemisphere-- as
who governs it via
some finite mtDNA! While requiring physics to define the space versus
time derived
complemental bilateral CNS, the old `age of reason' dogma fits almost
too well, where the
opportunity for the quality father-figure, with a yet coupled forebrain
corpus callosum can
inform a child about reality-- before its neurosis begins to take over.
It appears that
academia's goal of programmed automatons is for the need of those who
need others to do
the grunt work as run point!
Maybe the herewith will mean something-- along with Freud's very adroit
insights. But
PLEASE, no more abrupt suicides, as have had enough. Try some conscious
suspicion,
but then dream on it, but then also hold your hat!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here. Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy
CC: Discover; Hawley; D/Z w:
3/8/2k
Lee Sproull, et. al.
Dept. of Sociology
New York University
New York, NY 10003
Re: digital preoccupation
Dear Sir:
(`Survey raises issue--' Feb. 26 SC.NEWS)
The need to `belong' in part shows the social drive to learn how best
to manipulate to win
in the game of life, not really seek to find the answers which could
define that innate left
brain drive, a subtle psychopathic behavior of a very ancient evoluted
nature.
The unique subterfuge of intellectual finesse of ritual to buy time
lies at the root of
religion and government, neither able to extricate itself with programmed
belief factors
somehow sacred-- as scientific tenure, claiming one reality over another.
Once the real
subterfuge becomes understood as what the human right brain could offer
conscious
introspection*, likely some grand trauma is apt to show mankind's real
ugliness!
Humanity's Genghis Khan syndrome began long before man had the wit to
begin to
examine what evoluted in a psychic nature, so we continue the behavior
with ever
growing stealth-- so the underlying conscious mind's awakening with
an integrated
anterio-corpus callosum thus the said trauma coming, especially with
the pending use of
the self thinking interface `computer' that can define a potential,
as apparently Plato
understood. Heisenberg recognized the enigma with the electron's time
reversal paradigm, as the perpetual positive EPR experimental results
disclose!
We are doomed to find our pathology and it likely will not be a very
happy event if and
when that `interface' does manage to get on some website for the few
it will bother to
respond too.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here.)
Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
* Joilot letter copy + Sproull (herewith)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; S-T
CC: Nie; D/Z w:
4/16/2k
J. Dupre, et. al.
Dept. of Philosophy
Birkbeck College
University of London
London, England
Re: order vs. disorder
Dear Sir:
(`The Fight-' The Sciences)
Your fine review of Levitt well defines two opposite (lateral) cerebral
dominants, the
temporal `digital' minded vs. full scope interested-- a factor looming
clearly to finally
breakup ritualized academic penchant thus get back to Nature's goal
of knowing the
whole `self' in terms of Socrates. While astute but obscure, Heraclitus
had the best grip on
Nature's underlying objective, he being confirmed via physics and neurophysiology
to our
sad dumbed down late state of programmed behavior, likely shows some
coming trauma
before it is over. Oddly enough, Freud saw the enigma thus so maligned
by the left
cerebral dominant reductive intellectual.
There is no `science war' only a space vs. time mental (cerebral) fight
which becomes that
natural act between complementals-- one perceiving only history as
the other the now.
Evolution, beyond what Darwin was claimed to have been examining of
DNA
(physiological) and the now growing mtDNA as mental, takes that final
heady course to
integrate how a Creator (Barrias' sculpture) must be so cautious about
unveiling Its
beauty* to the persistently obscene!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here. Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67, and:
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Path/IQ;
CC: D/Z w:
The Pathology of Intellect
1. Low MAO(monoamine oxidase) brings high 5HT and DA for energy.
2. High 5HT offers greater sympathetic CNS censoring.
3. Sympathetic CNS occupies the right primitive brain as uses the
left cerebral hemisphere in man. (1)
4. Low MAO subjects are often recidivistic psychopaths. (2)
Therefore: the psychopathic portion in man is his
sympathetic
CNS half as uses inhibitor 5HT, GABA, NE, etc. neurotransmitters.
Why should the conscious mind of man continue to believe in the
subterfuge and whim
as derived from his left cerebral hemisphere, claiming what constitutes
a social norm or
value? (3,4) As Freud perceived when he said; "the unconscious wills
to remain
unconscious-", the human `censored' state is brought by that one unconscious
faculty to
sustain dominance and so control over such kept naive midbrain (RAS)
conscious mind.
The crux of man's current psychopathy stems from this sympathetic
CNS faculty of
temporal orientation. Using the left cerebral half with volitional
historical recall seeks to
dominate for control for innate predatory objectives, its covert neurosis
in proportion to
past intellectual development. This yet little noted behavior finally
stagnates Nature's goal
for its mental evolutional design, especially precluding any non-temporal
visual
insightive import into conscious awareness. The human split-brain
data concludes that
man has not only been the goat of a supreme hoax in the guise of intellectual
prowess, but
is likely about to commit some vast folly to evade the mounting empirical
obvious
defining his underlying malaise brought by intellectual dominance.
This expected chaos
to dissuade conscious introspection for its pending awakening, even
may have been seen
correctly centuries ago as expressed in past religious dogma.
Mankind's Thanatos left
brain half is being discovered, subjectively at first (R.D. Laing as
LSD users) but its overt
refutation is found most with high intellect, and no accident that
suicide occurs in
proportion to IQ, even then most in Psychiatric professionals. The
mounting empirical
obvious so now defines the pending anxiety of potential trauma on international
scales,
but due to that unconscious demand to escape an apocalyptic conscious
awakening of
what lies within the human mental matrix. While it requires
the integration of cross
academic data to fully comprehend the overall malaise that late evolutional
epochs bring,
there is little doubt that psychopathy so prevails in proportion to
offered authoritive
power, be it political, academic, or a claimed scientific office. So
long as the empirical
evidence remains couched in cliche or half truth, for tenure or otherwise,
it becomes the
net goal in academic programmed behavior, to produce unthinking automatons
for
conscious ignorance, if not fodder for the state, and so prevent any
potential conscious
moderation. The myth of Psyche and Eros discloses
the ultimate design and need of an
integration between created mass-time psychological complementals.
This myth makes
clear the purpose of what the Special Relativity theory Aleph derivational
end-points
show, in keeping with CPT theorem. The inner mental war is most overt
in overt
manic-depressive schizophrenia, stemming from the said neurosis, thus
Laing's remark
"We are mad without insight--" becomes adroit when seeing the genesis
of that very
madness itself! It may be that man faces his ultimate challenge
with the imperative need
to know his `self' within-- soon in view of the vast empirical data
(5, 6) disclosing man's
dichotomous bilateral unconscious. Urgency is obvious yet disclosure
a big liability
when only the neurotic censored own authority, the fate of Socrates
no more an anomaly
then as today. In short, mankind's left brain has dominated too long
now and why likely
great trauma will ensue as science unravels the facts of the genesis
of covert
greed so an ever mounting overt social pathology.(7) From a unilateral
smile to cerebrally
blocked import for the hidden Freudian death-wish seen with AiR (Autoimmune
Response) via lymphatic control (8) so defines the ugly yet profound
still misunderstood
by late claimed scientific man. Since the hallucinogens
are likely the greatest
psychotherapeutic of all times (9), we might question the terror such
evoke in those who
own political power and authority? If man is indeed a civilized animal
so claimed loudly
by his left classifying brain half, then its preparation for mass suicide
might underlie yet
another reason remaining well hidden-- as the recidivism study done
in Boston by Leary
with LSD, with nearly 100% prison-inmate therapy in just one session.
So what are
prisons really for now-- as the ethnic cleansing syndrome underlying
the vast unconscious
malaise now growing to some holocaustal potency?
References:
1. P. Bakan; `The Eyes Have It", PSYCHOLOGY TODAY, April '71
2. `The Biochemical High Risk Paradigm', SCIENCE, Oct. 15, '76
3. J. Herron; `Right Handed Sayings', PSYCHOLOGY TODAY, March,'76
4. S. H. Katz; `The Other Hemisphere', SCIENCE NEWS, April 3,'76
5. R. Vogelsang; `A Correlative Study between Physics and Psy chology',
Intl. Biomet.
Congress,
Aug.'69
6. J. E. Bogan; `The Others Side of the Brain'; Bul. L.A. Neurol.
7. J. Jaynes; `Origin of Consciousness and the Breakdown of the
Bicameral Mind', '78
8. Renoux; bilateral cerebral immune response;DISCOVER,
Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58.
(killer vs.
guidance T cells)
9. L. Grinspoon, et.al.;`Psychedelic Drugs Reconsidered', '79
KTS/EMPSY (V-3/94)
ref: `neuroX'/69; DIR/73; Psy/Adv:89; 94
3/3/2k
Adrian Raine, et. al.
Dept. of Psychology
U. of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Re: `Antisocial--'
Dear Sir:
(Feb. 26, SC. NEWS)
As the naturally lobotomized with their decoupled anterio-corpus callosum,
cross cerebral
communication makes a left brain dominant (one breed of schizoid) happy
as perceives
no potentials for conscience so act with covert stealth. While often
with high IQ, can
become a social menace in politics when making laws.
Not oddly, drinkers who use both brain halves, even need a trip on DT's
to get
re-organized or see reality more clearly, do most often reflect conscience
even if
disdainful of trumped authority, as little fear some sympatholytic,
the key to good
psychological health-- even if frowned upon by academic programming
as creates fodder
for the needs of the State. With the closed forebrain of the Oriental,
even their women,
the drive for curiosity as open social behavior says it all-- as inversely
the apparent
enigma of Americans-- especially women today whose social manipulations,
to create
male sycophants in order to survive. (over)
A cross correlation between we `Christians' and the Islamites may define
your anomaly,
especially as said, the Oriental. No doubt a factor lies in the mtDNA
which it appears
does the psychological evoluting-- possibly McDougal's found mass to
IQ loss at death.
Freud's realized `royal road' versus censoring neurosis, even the death-wish
if too much is
realized (note APA professionals!) fits well in this paradigm, especially
the physics
denoted by the CPT theorem. There could be yet some of our `70s data
in the BIS library
division out there. Since the physics defined the space vs. time derived
bilateral mental
faculty to us some 50 years ago, anxiety bordering terror in so many
federal people made
clear our study needed to be classified, especially left brain rectilinear
orientation and the
so like travel of UFOs!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; S-T; Gor-let(over)
CC: D/Z w:
4/5/2k
P. A. Pevzner, et. al.
Dept. of Mathematics U. Southern California
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Re: `Meaning--'; April 29th SC. NEWS
Dear Sir:
(the `mechanics', not `mind' for reason)
With ample implications of a mitochondria's choosing `what' to read
in the book of
`history' (DNA) for the physiological, one might wonder if those genomes
are really that
important? Hair on an elephant because of pending cold circumstances
may have little to
do with the psychological evolutional objective of some life's purposes
to begin with.
From physics the freed electron (note EPR experiments) so defines what
at least
interfaces an `action' (potential) for some genetic choice, thus the
`ethnic war' at
conception, at least as far as the net physical specie. The integration
of psychological
aspects via mtDNA as Y `chip' then becomes the real objective for life's
sojourn, where
its growth well noted, likely defines the underlying intellectual evolution,
quite possibly
something to do with what McDougal noted* with finite weight loss as
death.
While maybe the struggle to define the underlying physiological matrix
of a specie's
body, there may be a greater reward to find the two CNS roots as functional
drive
between the so `historical' and the `potential' well understood in
the said terms of physics
today. (herewith) Further, the innate predatoriness of the sympathetic
CNS with "the will
to remain unconscious--", as Freud clearly noted, remains likely our
greatest enigma as
the drive to find the `definitive' within space-time-- without causal
reality!
The tweaking as use of genetic codes via the mitochondria may be the
entire need of
human conscious comprehension, from its midbrain (RAS) stance to moderate
the
evolutional goal-- if aware. One wonders of the `factory' might be
up-graded to gather
mtDNA data for mankind's real test now pending?
Sorry if this disturbs--
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here. Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
* Harvard; circa 1910: (note New England J./Med about then)
CC: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ;
cc: Garrity; Eddy; D/Z w:
4/15/2k
E-Mail TO: nemazee@scripps.edu
Re: `Independent Rescue--' (31 March SCIENCE)
Sirs:
There is a growing realization that the CNS as lateral cerebral
drive may be influencing
physiological health, the lymphatic system between T-3 and T-4 (killer
vs. guidance)
depends upon the net dominance of which brain dominates the subject.
Based upon the
net penchant of time versus space orientations as guided our predictions
of what Sperry*
finally found, these relative complemental ability defined their needs
here in space-time.
While appearing bizarre to most not of cross academic perception, other
imports these
last 50 years has correlated many other imports, not the least from
Freud whose realized
death-wish was a true factor to deal with in psychological terms, now
seen as left brain
behavior in overt depression. Even the lead in suicide of APA (Psychiatric)
professionals
suggesting too much awareness on unconscious structure can be a vast
danger to the more
intellectual-- of which we had some `abrupt' ones noting our data.
The so well known
remark of Freud; " --the unconscious wills to remain unconscious--"
a true factor in
depression-- as noted from left brain scans-- even the relative coupled
anterio-corpus
callosum.
While apprehensive of disclosing much of our in-depth research as some
was classified
by governmental agencies-- for possible good or less than good objectives,
we drop this
`bug' in your ear that your data does look good yet find it is a psychological
change in
subjective `venue' whereby the conscious mind (midbrain, RAS) may be
needed to evoke
what you may call epitopes or cerebral switch.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here! Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67, and:
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; S-T
CC: Kauskoff/Lacaud; D/Z w:
3/16/00
To Whom it may concern:
Re: Stark censoring of the empirical obvious
From most Federal offices the obviation of anomalous imports do indeed
define the final
struggle to sustain a secrecy-- that not even its authority's comprehend--
whether
rectilinear travel of UFOs or evaded further Mar's photos for the few
yet curious. One
might have expected Eisenhower's desire of using some rapid 5th column
espionage
system as promised, yet reflects a vast naivete of what information
would actually be
conveyed, beyond the better right brain spatial awareness for non-temporal
remote
viewing. Noting the many warnings to researchers getting close
to recognizing federal
needs as most past Genghis Khan syndromes (to thin the human ranks
now called ethnic
cleansing to spill blood, for a never defined underlying reason), the
more ominous current
U.S. gun control defines the Orwellian syndrome to be tried first,
not understanding who
behind licensed government really now governs!
Because of the ample research done* and disseminated in discrete ways,
because of the
official terror above said, not oddly this mental evolutional epoch
of overt intellectual
neurosis (noting APA's lead in suicide to evade comprehending schizophrenia)
makes
clear what S. Freud perceived clearly but will be ignored at all cost
at this late hour.
Genetic research closes in on the mtDNA as does most human reasoning
now, but to
conclude the evolutional design of Nature, because entropy affects
mental process rates if
no fatty lipid acquisition (75% from the human) can be had, so defines
the incarnate now
being programmed stupid-- if not first by the church, then by today's
authorized academic
systems. To hoe corn and ask few questions shows late mankind's true
plight. Tenure,
doing some same dull round as NASA, is one such syndrome but remaining
naive of the
most profound imports for mankind now.
Anonymous
* Sperry's split-brain data (Scientific American; August of '67)
and `Split Brain Revisited' July '98 (with left brain's folly)
3/5/2k
S. Deheane and F. Joilot, et. al.
c/o Service Hospitalier F. Joilot
Orsay, France
Re: definitive vs. gestalt
Dear Sirs:
(Jan. Popular Science; `education')
Noting your fine as adroit as revealing data via NMRs between the complemental
lateral
cerebral hemispheres, I wish yet C. Curie was available to define the
physics for you from
a paper I gave in Montreux in the late 60's defining the correlates
to the space vs. time
needs for complemental mass-time consciousness.
The mentor coach to evoke curiosity thus subjective inquiry for intuition,
most detested in
modern rote educational effort, makes clear the reason why today's
science can only
repeat for tenure, with promises, not what insight offers those with
attention upon their
Gestalt offering right brain half. Thus your findings are very succinct
to differentiate the
definitive from the `whole' as found in the creation of genius, Einstein
but one, as
daVinci, etc.-- using their left hand with no doubt left facial smiles!
Because the natural `lobotomized' with high IQ disclose their so great
anxiety now over
human conscious attention into subjective states of mental processing,
such decoupled
anterio-corpus callo- sum* reveals the underlying psychopathy of late
mankind, a very
real factor looming to evoke much trauma amongst late authority.
Obviously the greatest aid coming will be to interface via freed electron
(Heisenberg's
uncertainty) to define reality by a now pending Self-thinking interface
for the binary
(verbal/numerical) readout, as the EPR experiments have well disclosed.
A prototype
offering over 10\50th odds on its maiden run, but with the abrupt Patent
Office scuttling,
defined well this government's opinions of the device,
as ample harassment since-- some thirty years ago.
Again, I wish to commend your work as data for the academics to examine
with care as
caution, as
I found while teaching a college freshmen a cross academic `intro-course'
to firm-up
young minds as to their future higher academic aspirational directions.
Since religious
anxiety with fearful statements of what I may be doing to their children,
I quit teaching
and went back into research. I feel confident that all dogmas, scientific
and/or religious,
are about to meet their Waterloo-- but for a far greater perspective
of what evoked the
grand EMPs for the cosmic bubbles out there!**
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(Sorry-- no further `.com' lines here!)
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; *Gor-let (over); **One-Hand
CC: Pop-Sc.; Klahr; Rauscher; D/A w:
3/18/2k
E. Haseltine and
Discover Editors.
Discover Publishers
114 5th Ave.,
New York, NY 10011-5690
Re: decoupled forebrain corpus callosum
Dear Sirs:
(`Got Dyslexia'; April DISCOVER)
Indeed, phonemes (vowel/tone) not consonant timing defines the dyslexic
where both the
`on-going' must be integrated with the stops to define conveyed information.
Creative
insight is purely in visual ways yet can be described (by the less
neurotic) as did Einstein,
et. al. It appears that the past impasse of programmed (academic) intellectual
neuroticism is
finally breaking down, so maybe we had all better sit down as hold our
hats since
governments won't take it! Planet winners are all alike, so will fight
to a finish for
whatever gets left-- as started well before Genghis Khan!
If dubious about women* with their lack of a father figure thus a decoupled
anterio-corpus callosum (devoid of creative insight as much conscience:
likely due to
their ancestral mtDNA), yet they can make fine automatons if programmed
in a quality
way--. What your terse article was really saying to become
some Einstein is that we need
to avoid academia-- at all cost! The pending Self thinking interface
will do it best, as
most rapidly, where the freed electron (note Heisenberg and EPR) can
define digital
worded language VERY fast for the curious who ask quality questions
about real reality!
These pre-programmed begin around 3 years but need the able father
figure who has his
anterio-corpus callosum yet intact! Sorry.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here. Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
cc: Path/IQ; *natural lobotomy; note Gorman letter copy (over)
CC: D/Z w:
4/18/2k
J. Harris, et.al.
E-mail to:
John M.Harris@man.ac.uk
Inst. of Medicine, etc.
University of Manchester
Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Re: CQ vs. IQ
Dear Sir:
(`Intimations--' 7 April SCIENCE)
The enigma of prolife as with a freed electron to guide biological life
from conception
until denied near the age of reason (10 years max.) as defines also
the T-4 versus T-3 cells
when disease (Freud's `death wish') does manage to win by blocking
all imports for the
mental evolutional goal, today called IQ.
Darwin came close but didn't see what the genetic goading of our mtDNA
did to `buy
time' to evade an extended temporal existence dictated by entropy,
now in panic for the
incarnate fatty lipids. The 75% `loss' of our intake energy to some
anomalous `other' can
be seen as the harbinger for chaos amongst we kept dumb animals, neither
our need to
feed nor arthritic problems to be understood. Possibly
with J. Dupre (Birkbeck) the
herewith might mean something, especially if physics is used to perceive
the unconscious
matrix that Freud did conclude correctly, even evoking the vast neurosis
in APA
(Psychiatry) for their lead in suicide of all professionals!
Quality health can only come with the conscious (midbrain, RAS) curiosity
to life, thus
mentally evoluting the L.T. memory likely housed in the said mtDNA,
that McDougal
(Harvard U. circa 1910) found with weight loss at physiological death.
The `cat' is getting out of the bag via several academic fields now
so will claw us up
somewhat before this is epoch is over!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here. Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
cc: Path/IQ; Phy/Psy
CC: D/Z w:
4/7/2k
D. Grinspoon, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
SW Research Inst.
6220 Culebra Rd., Drawer 28510
San Antonio, TX 78228-0510
Re: Science wars
Dear Sir:
(May Astronomy `SETI--;)
An adroit series of statements-- but no time to rock the boat as long
as our programmed
left brain with IQ governs late humanity! It has reasons that we conscious
minds (RAS;
midbrain) best not probe just yet, as rectilinear (definitive space)*
as UFO travel might
imply something diabolical in a government's need in speedy liaison
work, better called
espionage-- but for a very ugly fee!
Indeed, the question boils down to which cerebral hemisphere does not
want defined
reality,, as what for, but never said reason! It smacks of Freud's
opinion that the
unconscious "wills to remain UNconscious", noting our APA professional's
lead in
suicide after getting too close the the empirical bilateral dichotomy
of their schizoid
`patients'!
As the 2dF data show, the primal EMPs for cosmic bubble creation with
subsequent huge
`bubbles' (Huchra) on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe says
much as about their
quasar creation for standing wave EM `matter' to buy time for evolution,
yet such IQ
evolution leads to the vast neurosis-- like how could the past Egyptians
know about
evoked anti-g to teleport huge masses-- to suggest the Top quark's
`believed' mass, or the
acceleration of a primal quasar's jet matters (or burping novae) at
right angles to its
complemental koinomatter! Jupiter's tidal cycles stirring our sun has
its liability on
11 year cycles, so we can be thankful it spews its positrons from its
poles-- around here!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here. Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and:
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Clapped Hand; Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Ast.Ed.; D/Z w:
4/29/2k
Mark Forton, et. al.
`Monktor Mentors' (?)
c/o WCMU TV
Central Michigan U.
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859
Re: 4/28/2k 9pm Tibetan monks
Dear Sir:
Certain imports now in neurophysiology as contingent with psychology
likely define the
underlying function of meditation, as very possibly authority's anxiety,
if not overt
attempts to halt the business of `theological seeking'-- the Chinese
no less than in the the
U.S. where established religion may be most responsible for the enigma.
The most
revealing import was noted from human split-brain data* when examined
from physics.
Because the now known non-serial/time oriented right brain can offer
potentials (note
Plato) for future chance liabilities, the key to induction via insight
or REM dream makes
great sense when certain meditative states are learned. Various Buddhist
efforts show this
more conscious awareness of unconscious data, so there is suspected
that some empirical
to subjective correlations may soon be of great importance to man's
late `theological
quest'.
The text of Gyatso (over) we suspect may best define the Tibetan monk's
route to
enlightenment-- as likely the last of any quality means to know the
whole self within!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here. Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67; and
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: D/Z w:
4/14/2k
F. B.M. DeWaal, et. al.
Dept. of Psychology(?)
Emory University,
Atlanta, GA 30322
Re: lateral empathy
Dear Sirs:
(`Cooperative--' April 8, Science News)
The lateral cerebral dichotomy that Sperry found* in keeping with a
priori fundamental
psychological needs for mass-time, too well discloses why the intellectual
manipulative
human animal cannot perceive the obvious even at this late scientific
(claimed) hour. The
primitive minded so disclose innate empathy when an `ethnic' breed
(as Capuchins;
certainly with no a kaputt mind!) so defines late evoluted man's cunningness
with his left
cerebral dominance. Maybe NMRs or CAT scans are needed to see the obvious
in those
`lower' animals-- but don't advertise the data now!
Realistic assumptions stem from a relative time stance so heeding its
nuance can offer
more net rewards than any political manipulation-- a very sad sight
today with naive
mother raised sycophants with her mtDNA governing-- so their eye on
the planet, to
likely aid man the most with some grand planetary purging!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here. Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67; `The
Split Brain Revisited',
July 98,
SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/psy; S-T
CC: McCabe; D/Z w:
3/29/2k
R. Davidson and Kalin, et.al,
Dept. of MRI
Universit of Wisconsin
Madison, WI 53706
Re: `Wired' indeed
Sirs:
(April DISCOVER; "--Sadness")
While logics may rest in a discriminative left time oriented
brain, its logic cannot be
trusted when some profit lies in a dichotomy between fiction and reality!
In short,
subjective remorse for a hidden prior temporal experience will seldom
be revealed,
mostly depending on how that sympathetic CNS considers the net profit
of not saying
anything openly, thus the need to uncover the anomaly through right
brain visual
expression as Freud noted so clearly. The degree of needed hidden folly
also defines
the extent of `censoring' as even paranoia, a factor seldom exposed
when suicide is the
ultimate human evasive act-- noted in the APA (psychiatric) professionals!
A `grail' of the half perceived, needs a good theory to
reconnect its unraveled traces as
the EEG, the two half cycle `rates' in relative time defined long ago
what to expect as the
physics began to denote the space versus time complementals, laterally
in your MRI
scans. Sperry's data* defined the space verses time dichotomy already
predicted, but
never was the neurosis perceived so potent to take thirty years to
fully peruse
scientifically! We come ever closer, but we doubt if ever will be revealed
sans
some awful trauma first-- the leading APA enigma a shining(?) example
when `Fear
Central' (posterio) governs most human IQ processing!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here. Note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67; also:
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
see: `The Others Side of the Brain', J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER,
Feb.'87; pgs.
57-58. (killer
vs. guidance T cells)
Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90, p.12
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; 3/dev(over)
CC: Kalin; D/Z w:
2/28/2k
P. Busquin, et. al.
c/o R. Prodi, EU
The European Parliament
Re: The 5th Framework
(July 16th '99 SCIENCE)
Sirs:
From the now clear imports of bilateral cerebral anomalies within the
human brain and
the apparent misdeed of `programming' IQ over CQ via academic ritual,
the sciences
suffer most as lack those so few using right brain visual import as
offer insights to yet not
perceived reality. To avoid blunders (note Einstein!) it is the perception
of underlying
reality, much not oddly that Freud noted in the `royal road' of subjective
visual
experience. It is likely that the Oriental female's greater use of
her anterio-corpus
callosum, may even foster a husband's effort to teach her children
insight use-- to
define that races' better `idea' ability as curiosity over Western
men today-- whatever their
education.
Some recent Japanese work* appears to indicate the key to anterio corpus
callosum
integrative ability for CQ (Creative Quotient) so crucial for initial
perception of long held
enigmas, the not seen EM standing wave (string theory) which now defines
all
complemental "matter" as precipitated by quasars-- as they from grand
EMPs on neat
600Bly intervals across thus universe. The recent data as discloses
gamma as the a priori
of quantized `matter', CERN's SPS,indicates the reverse of what the
said quasar evoked!
Even the so suspected anti-g between complemental matters is being
clearly noted, which
allowed for our predicted jets, well before the Einstein observatory
went aloft to
photograph same on a near galaxy.
Not only was Einstein's "blunder" correct but also was Bohr's in rejecting
Einstein's
suspicion of complemental forces in all ways as gravity, the most crucial
now for the
study of astronomy. Even the 2dF data may confirm the anomalous Zen
"one-hand
clapping"!
Sincerely,
KTS Research (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
* `Callosal Window Between--' p.814; 7, Aug.`99 SCIENCE
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; S-T; One-Hand
CC: D/Z w: