To Whomever:
Maybe its time to examine how standing wave `billiard balls' got
their
start
on the cosmic EMP front for creating quasars and the complemental
matters
(disk/jets) with anti-g-- then you might see how to unravel same to
get back
the gamma-- called `CF' if judiciously brought together with
synchronous
lasers-- now that the whole quark (3-phased standing wave) is
understood
and
can be de-segmented or unraveled.
(What Roger is saying is that matter is created
from the cosmic EMP and the energy it contains. )
An introductive essay (in part):
The Clapped One Hand
The multitudes of cosmic EMP (Electro-Magnetic Pulse)
bubbles
across this
universe, each tumbling-out standing waves we call matter, create
electrons
(first harmonic standing waves), thence3-phase whole quarks. The
`billiard-ball' concept of matter dissolves into a profound reality
defining
the primal magnetic field of this universe, with mind, can be tapped
in more
than one way.
(continued) KTS Research
Feb. 25,'91
Richard F. Mushotzky, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Goddard Space Center
Greenbelt, MD 20771
Re: dark matter
Dear Sir:
The six times net matter indicated in the recent SC.NEWS did not
reflect
`where' as contingent with the relative pole-disk orientation of NGC
1399. Was
there any net dichotomous lobe data at right angles of the disk
configuration?
Since our predicted jet-disk anomaly confirmation (Einstein Obs.) years
ago,
(to satisfy mutual complemental matter anti-g at genetic `white'
cores),
pos¬
sibly some observed data might suggest the ejected jet matter might
be noted
far out-- even with the ellipticals. While some evidence of gamma
bursts
near
outer disk fringes may define re-coagulation (collision) of the said
jet
matters (via mutual attractive g), we seek further data associated
with dark
matter.
Any directives to your published data will be appreciated, and/or
comments
to
the above said matter-- in two ways!
Sincerely,
KTS
May 10,91
Cyrl Hazard, et. al. Dept. Astronomy
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Re:BR 1202-07; jet matter clouds?
Dear Sir:
I wonder if your `see through' primal matter clouds, as the 3C273
anomaly
(if
not the same), are accumulated jet matter as spewed from intervening
quasar-galaxy sources? (Stars
that appear black.) If the equal `distant' pairs of
clouds have
yet a
`coming and going' signature, the possibility may be. In any case,
if so,
would be what we suspect are `white holes' on EMP walls to likely
resolve
the
Big Bang theory.
Thank you for any feedback.
Sincerely,
KTS
CC:R.Harms; McMahon; Gunn; Davidsen
CC:
Cyrl Hazard, et. al.
Dept. Astronomy
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
May 28,'91
J. Primack, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Califnoria
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Re: nuclear power-- anyplace
Sirs:
(SC. AM.; June, p.42)
While proprietary work here defines the timely, indeed comes the new
means for
controlled fusion. Since the advent of laser controlled ions, such
plasma
combinatorial effect as in chemistry*, now brings close the finesse
needed for
finite controlled fusion borne upon coherent laser fronts. Such
`phased'
arrays will at last put to rest Tokomats as all other dangerous means
of
tapping the atom. The problem as we see it will be governments and
big
business who will yet seek to control these new `petite' energy
generating
means-- for old, if not said, obvious reasons.
Your fine article was succinct but suspect was derived from
redundant
thoughts
derived from old art. While our work remains yet proprietary, the below
references may aid in defining the tersely said above.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser
prop.)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
`Collisionless Shock Waves', SC.AM. 4/91; (multi-pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control--'; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Ultra Fast Physics', G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,'90 (laser prop.)
`Microplasmas', Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.'90
`--fracto-fusion' p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,'90
`Fractional Statistics:-' SC., March 9,'90 (bi-dimens. quantals)
CC: The Federation of American Scientists
attn: S. Aftergood, D. Hafemeister,
O. Prilutsky, S. Rodionov, et.al.
307 Massachusetts Ave., NE
Washington, DC 20002
June 6,'91
Lars Hernquist and
J. Barnes, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of California
Santa Cruz, 95064
Re: `exactly--'? (star-burst elliptics)
Dear
Sirs:
(NEWSWEEK: June 3; p.46)
But maybe anti-g and so crowding from returning spewed jet matter
pinches
the
two sides of the elliptical galaxy to force greater coagulation in
that disk
matter for star formation? Using the CPT theorem many years ago to
define
possible anti-g, to make clear the predicted jet-disk anomalies
thereafter
noted (as with the Einstein Observatory) that Big Bang was likely to
get
rescinded.
One wonders if you you started with a slightly different paradigm as
anti-g
between ejected complemental matters from white genetic (instead of
black)
holes for quasar cores, a much different simulated picture would not
emerge?
It no doubt would fit our predictions again, and a reality that somehow
gets
blinded by tenure.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
CC: Stephen Maran, Dept. of Astronomy
NASA; Goddard Space Center, Greenbelt Rd., Greenbelt, MD 20771
July 3,'91
Michael J. West, et.al.
Canadian Inst. of Theoretical
Astrophysics
Toronto, Ont. Canada
Re: `focussed' rf as light?
Dear
Sir:
(SCIENCE NEWS, 6/22/91, p.396)
We have been seeking data which might conclude `bubble' EMP with
magnetic
flux
alignment for quasar jet orientation, might you be seeing this anomaly
now?
Any large `elliptical' as appearing near the observational center we
suspect
could define the others nearby but on that bubble radius with differing
net
appearance.
The expected very high density magnetic fields near quasars (beyond
the said
EMP bubble front) with a secondary shock wave, we suspect evoke the
quasar for
complemental matter genesis, the predicted jets versus disks (before
the
Einstein Observatory proved same) are created but separated sustained
by
anti-g there-between. The higher angular speeds of disks with radii
appear to
conclude our theory of white holes (not black) eject the two
complemental
matters from quasar cores, no Big Bang therefore. The ejection rates
of their
jet matter will likely be seen as shadow matter in huge pole plumes,
likely
re-coagulating with mutual g around the periphery of the disk, likely
the
gamma bursters there already seen.
We suspect quasar jets aim alike with some more primal magnetic flux
field and
would like to see any evidence thereof. Should your work or others
in the
field of cluster alignment observation be able to define same as on
bubble
fronts as we expect (per cluster) we would appreciate some word or
directives
theretoo.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
Aug. 24,'91
Editor, et.al.
Astronomy Publishers
21027 Cross Roads Circle
P.O. Box 1612
Waukesha, WI 53187
Re: Quasars light up much more!
Dear
Sirs:
(Sept. issue, p.42)
The fine article on likely `shadow matter'. It may be defining jet
matters
as
spewed from quasar white-holes, but due to anti-g between complemental
primal
matters created therein, forming the disk to jets. Predicted many years
ago to
satisfy the CPT theorem to balanced forces, the Big Bang syndrome took
on less
validity for petite ones-- especially now with the nicely separated
`bubbles'
(EMPs) upon which galactic (quasar) matter genesis may be easily
generated
from a denser magnetic field to generate mass for slow-time.
The dv/dt red shift, as even tired light over distance, (likely due
to
magnetic fields; Zeeman affect) may yet define distance in crude
parameters,
yet as the current article's implication, will require much
fudge-factoring
once observational intervening space (as the universal magnetic
Apriori)
is
fully perceived and understood.
While we were elated with the Einstein Observatory's disk-jet
confirmation,
we
find even more happiness with in this HST data. Thanks-- however few
other Big
Bang enthusiasts will agree. Arp may yet pull the genie out of the
bag,
however tenurism defines the status-quo demand-- where survival is
deemed more
important.
Sincerely,
KTS
Jan. 4,'92
Editors, et.al.
Sky and Telescope
49 Bay State Rd.,
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: Focal Point (+) on THE focal point!
Sirs:
Your plasma issue (Feb.'92) finally hits the nail on the head! It
defines
without saying overtly so the genesis of quasar white hole cores for
ensuing
complemental matter creation, riding on a potent EMP `bubble' front.
Plasma is
a second generation phenomena as a `degeneration' of pinched a very
dense
magnetic field, each both mutually at right angles as well as to the
magnetic
field lines (EMP) to likely define the spatial orientation of those
ensuing
galaxies riding the one dense bubble front. Most astounding are the
nice
600MLY separations between those many EMP fronts begging the
$64 question of
whose the one hand clapped to evoke those EMPs? This likely sounds
esoteric to
tenured ears but maybe in another 30 years--, who knows. At least the
Birke¬
land dual currents show why the galaxy disk versus jets (relative to
the
prevailing magnetic lines of force) expand relatively differently,
when anti-g
then ensures their separation thereafter. We need now to confirm our
galaxy's
dual jet-matter `bubbles' by EUVE to conclude from where peripheral
gamma
`bursters' come.
Of interest is the genesis of great momentary red-shift (Arp) as a
fresh
quasar's light emission gets `tired' in that dense EMP, albeit over
time
becomes a true factor to be used for distance measurement when a galaxy
cools
as the its EMP moves on. Lerner's adroit remarks about Schramm defines
all
scientific inquiry where tenure, at all cost, must dictate some status
quo, as
in politics now-- creating the greatest net danger to mankind, ever.
From three-phased complemental quarks, anti-g and no "mass" (just
force)
so
deBroglie's wavelet universe will be understood someday as the
neurotics
in
power die off. Even the freed electron will be perceived as Plato's
Potentia o
define and
allow other users, and so at
last man's conscious attention where it belongs.
Sincerely,
CC: Lerner; Peratt
Eric J. Lerner, et.al.
Lawrence Plasma Physics Center
Lawrenceville, NJ
A. L. Peratt, et.al.
Dept. of Astro-Physics
Los Alamos Labs.
Los Alamos, NM 87544
Jan. 6,'92
Camille Trentacoste, et.al.
Center for EUV Astrophysics
University of California
2150 Kittredge St.,
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: jet matter `bubbles'?
Sirs:
From predicting the genesis of complemental matters from `white
hole'
cores as
jets versus disk with anti-g there-between as the likely separating
mechanism
many years ago, the Einstein Observatory confirmation made clear
another
prediction of EMP bubble fronts causing same, now noted on nicely even
600M LY
intervals!
From predicting gamma bursters at the periphery of a galaxy disk,
now
noted,
but from recoagulating jet matter collisions evading said disk matter,
one
might suspect vast clouds of this ejected primal matter to exist beyond
the
galaxy poles, to be possibly noted with UV blockage as with EUVE. If
so, the
pending conclusion of the universal genesis of quantized matter for
relatively
`slowed' temporal existence, to define the "cause from effect" designs
which
may have begun at the centers of cosmic bubbles in non-temporal states
as
Apriori E for ensuing mc squared in and for our wavelet reality.
(deBroglie)
Our 5th Generation computer R&D efforts, as predicted
the
spatial versus temporal complemental lateral cerebral faculty in man
(confirmed by Sperry) only needed the positive EPR experiments to
conclude
such device was indeed feasible-- which a proto-type then offered a
10\17th
odds readout on its maiden run. Now to conclude Nature's real
underlying
motive in our side of the complemental universe.
I would appreciate information or be privy to the coming imports of
EUVE data
as contingent with galaxy pole obscurations. Thank you.
Sincerely,
KTS
CC: AAVSO
AAVSO
25 Birch St.,
Cambridge, MA 02138
Jan. 18,'92
Tim Ferris, et.al.
c/o Wm. Morrow Publishers
1350 Ave. of the Americas
New York, NY 10019
Re: cosmology + neurophysiology
Dear
Sir:
(`The Mind's Sky')
Noted your brief TV appearance and implication of writing on
cosmology.
Aside
from right cerebral NDEs (as accurate spatial aptitudes), best examine
now
what Huchra sees with the nicely spaced EMP bubbles across the
universe--
hosting the quasar/galaxies!
You might see some correlates of both relative time and mental
complementarity
(in keeping with the CPT theorem) herewith, but when I predicted same
during
my 5th Generation computer feasibility studies some thirty years ago,
which
prototype offered the odds of 10\17th on its maiden run. The Patent
Office
slammed the door for obvious reasons, even put the FBI on me, tapped
phone and
you name it, but couldn't correlate any of my own company's business
with
classified aerospace computer work I did before.
Anyhow, this freed electron "interface" knows `effect from cause' and
`skeletons'-- which indicates my GVSC students alarm with "apocalypse"
twenty
years ago. If this all sounds bizarre-- which it indeed is to many,
yet have
no overt anxieties, find a qualified Physicist to explain their EPR
experiments. Plato's Potentia is alive and well, albeit most
neurotically
blocked in left cerebral dominant intellectuals now-- leading to--
well you
guess!
Sincerely,
KTS
cc:Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
Jan. 21,'92
S.S. McGaugh, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Re: Schombert's data
Dear
Sir:
(SC.NEWS, p.36; Jan. 18,'92)
Dim low net mass-density galaxies are indeed intriguing! Yet the
mounting
question now is how truly far, much less age, they might be in view
of the
dv/dt red shift anomaly. If truly "old" and yet not densified by mutual
g, it
implies little other anti-g, as is now suspected around the
ellitpical's
two
sides. From recoagulating jet matters-- as spewed from the same quasar
genetic
(white-`hole') core, this implies some splitting of disk matters--
maybe from
its own complemental (anti-g) matters somehow not yet seen-- as current
jet
`shadow matter' at quasar/galaxy poles. Some datanow at our galaxy's
pole ends
begin to infer their presence.
Since dv/dt portion of red shift is ambiguous to the unwary external
observer
to judge its emitter's net speed, the first criteria is to know that
factor of
shift ratio from the more dense magnetic(g) fields as surround fresh
quasars
riding EMP "bubble" (Huchra) fronts. Only the quiescent galaxy, after
its
creative EMP bubble front has moved on, can be used to judge its net
speed and
direction, relative to any`thing'(one) else-- much less its own EMP
center.
This evokes another question about rapid disk-planetary matter
formation?
Does
the elliptical show more star creation in its pinched areas to imply
a closer
anti-g force from re-coagulating jets matters? Also, there should be
more
gamma bursters in that region to show such higher velocity jet matters
meeting
itself.
While some now are looking for the expected jets with net
contra-twist
to
their galaxy disk matters, maybe more data will be soon forthcoming
to resolve
our theoretical work-- so disdained these past twenty years. One does
not
predict jet vs. disks (due to anti-g between complemental matters)
before any
Einstein Observatory goes aloft-- we find to our chagrin!
Sorry to bother--
Sincerely,
KTS
CC: Schombert; Knezek/Schneider; Djorgovski
P.M. Knezek and S.E. Schneider, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
CalTech
Pasadena, CA 91125
June 20,'92
R. N. Boyd, et.al.
Dept. of Physics/Astronomy
Ohio State University
Columbus, OH 43210
Re: phased space and your
Dear
Sir:
fine Physics Today article
Much as ISOLDE, the up-coming `hacker's delight' to find the precise
spatial
phased displacement of nucleons for fusion makes clear the dust will
be seen
world-wide in the stampede. Since our research from even more
fundamental
aspects (via De Broglie; unhampered with billiard-ball mentalities),
defined
the many EMPs with complemental matter genesis (as quasar/galaxies)
riding
same to define the nice 600Mly separation (Huchra), to say nothing
of the
anti-g needed (disk vs. jets) to further define how to unravel the
`quantized'
for its a priori E.
From the fundamental standing-wave e to quark third harmonic, the
whole
primary matrix can be understood, only the periodic table to need
comprehension. Most provocative and likely the source of defining ALL
of
Nature is the 5th Generation computer* as interfaces the e (escapes
the time
reversal paradigm) to now indicate via alpha-numeric what the EPR
experiments
are saying to Physics.
Third `harmonic' trefoil nuclides have various magnetic rigidity due
to their
exposed standing-wave portions. This permits understanding cold fusion
as a
form of sliding out-of-phase segments into merging to unravel their
net
quantal disposition. As Revol** (Physics advisor/UN) inferred, fusion
is just
around the corner.
Sincerely,
KTS
* 10\17th odds readout on prototype's maiden run!
** cc: environ.let
CC: D-T; D-Z; v-Baeyer
Aug. 17,'92
Joseph Silk, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Center for Particle Astrophysics
University of California,
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: gamma bursters
Dear Sir:
Halo derived matter is galactic pole anti-matter, ejected in jets to
escape
its disk complemental matter with anti-g, says it all.
Since my letter of Feb. 28,'91 on dark matter, it yet appears there
are some
bones of contention between the mounting empirical obvious and
uncritical
belief factors. "High-Velocity Pulsars--" (14 Aug. SCIENCE) somehow
evades the
re-coagulating jet matters with common (mutual) gravity factors
colliding
out
beyond our disk, but evading the said anti-g factor, to indicate super
high
velocity collisions for gamma bursters. They should most define primal
matter
as electrons and fundamentals (as small third harmonic standing wave
quarks).
Oh well, tenure now dictates all believed `research' so the few, too
damned
few, need not wonder!
Sincerely,
KTS
CC: Eichler; D/Z
Nov. 18,'92
W. G. Tifft, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ 85721
Re: more standing waves?
Dear
Sir:
(note #2; Aug. 3rd)
The Scientific American (Dec.'92) "Quantum Dissidents" at least
defines
some
reason yet prevailing in cosmology! As a recent note from Arp
suggesting
a
great "spectacular embarrassment" is in the offing, maybe due
to some of my
ongoing theoretical approach to SGUT (Super Grand Unified Theory) of
everything. Ego? Indeed, but with the FBI, police B&Es and tapped
phones (for
trying to Patent File the 5th Generation self thinking computer--
despite
my
GVSC student's ample warnings!)-- so today it requires a great deal
of it to
remain somewhat rational as a far deeper Orwellian spectre becomes
nearly
inevitable to keep us stupid. (That
is what God wanted. Forbid us from
eating "or consuming" from the
tree "passed on info" of knowledge.)
Your question may be; do cosmic bubbles set up `parasitic'
standing-wave
fronts, evoked by the first shock wave front which evoke the quasars
on those
bubble (Huchra) fronts? These multiples may be harmonics as 12 km/sec
(or
smaller) variables noted on the red shifts of different aged quasars?
With my
dv/dt red-shift idea of slowed EM propagation in denser magnetic
fields,
finally Arp* has grasped the concept and appears to be off and running.
The problem with believing that black holes are "too bright" with
primal
E
will not be seen as white holes, because the tenured in authority
called
them
"black" to begin with. Albeit I suspect the coming rapid switching
with "I
told you so" of past-tense black hole (as Big Bang) believers,
with a yet
faster rate of getting into another's bed, is pending for a white hole
dotted
universe. The larger `Bang' may be in cosmological offices and
may appear as
the apocalypse, according to my '71 GVSC students. More difficult to
swallow
is the genesis of EMPs on nicely spaced intervals, implying (no more)
one hand
clapping (Zen), knowing what It was doing for foot-stools! Some of
my work,
well shirked at the Smithsonian yet ('70's) may be of interest to you.
Sadly the authorized tenured go on claiming reality, as no longer
can
afford
to find, much less realize, a deeper reality, whatever the cost! Its
due to a
deep neurosis that Freud saw best. Guth's "inflation" theory missed
the real
beginning when the universe, or its EMP bubble centers, were indeed
"compressed", but of the Apriori of magnetic flux. Ask Faraday!
Sincerely,
KTS
* cc:Path/IQ; S-T; Phys-Psy; Arp's "flag" (over)
Dec. 3,'92
B. Elmgreen, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Harvard/Smithsonian
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: pinch yes, but which?
Sir:
(anti-g or EMP fronts)
Since the Einstein Observatory confirmed our predicted disk-jets as
evoked by
anti-g from white-hole matter genetic cores, riding vast EMP bubbles
(Huchra),
Hasegawa appears close possibly to define further the `enigma' if what
you
note adroitly "which way". (SCIENCE 20, Nov. p.1308) Since elliptical
pinch to
evoke greater star formation (we suspect from said anti-g again, but
from
peripheral cloud anti-matter for said anti-g from once spewed jets),
likely
the crux of this remaining anomaly can get unraveled now. The vast
EMP flux
turbulence, aside from the said anti-g affect, could promote the
head-long
impulses pushing matter also. This yet would need to be defined by
spatial
orientation (as you note) with the primal EMP flux once noting its
front via
companion galaxies riding same.
The real underlying question beyond no Big Bang is what indeed
clapped
Its
hand on nice 600 M light year intervals to evoke all those bubbles,
to create
time with precipitated complemental matter to begin with?
Sincerely,
KTSP.S. Hopefully Arp's remark "spectacular embarrassment" addressed to
Sky
Telescope gets printed. Maybe it will be that needed harbinger for
the larger
"Big Bang"-- in staid cosmological offices!
CC: Bally
12/8/92
R. Remillard, et.al.
Dept of Astronomy
Massachusetts Inst. of Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: Folger's "In the black"(?)
Dear
Sir:
(Jan. DISCOVER; p.29+)
There may be far more in the "black" soon, but better defined as
"despair",
especially for Big Bangers if Arp is correct! The M51 configuration
better
defines the primary disk-jets as complemental matters being spewed
from a
white hole as ride some EMP bubble (Huchra) not discerned yet. To
insist
on
`implosions', as no quantized matter (in wavelet form) can exist above
10x33rd
K. is awaiting Arp, to get the last laugh after all-- noting the white,
not
black holes out there. Even a super nova may never exist any smaller
than
three solar masses as again would blow itself to pieces on
re-coagulating.
The
`pinch' affect on wavelets-- yet called `billiard ball' matter, can
go only so
far to unravel itself (loop or string theory) near 10X33 Kelvin.
(Stars don't get smaller the
light slowly erodes away from the gravity untill
there is no more light escaping.)
These are indeed exciting times-- and for two underlying reasons!
Sincerely,
KTS
CC:Bailyn; Folger
C. Bailyn, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520
Dec. 24,'92
L. Krauss, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy(?)
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06
Re: machos looking for wimps?
Dear Sir:
We hope you are looking for the top quark where that 3rd phase
standing
wave
with its greatest anti-g. (so why not seen here) According to the
Klein-Kalusa
matrix is likely in those primal quasar complemental shadow matter
clouds from
their jets.
By examining the E=mc squared, where one or the other had to be the
Apriori,
only E could have had the net energy to do anything, so the cosmic
EMP bubbles
became such genetic sources for many `condensing' complemental matters
as
quasar `white-hole' cores riding their EMP front. Deceleration over
time
brought quantized standing waves (not `billiard balls'), the first
harmonic
electrons (sans time*) but further `condensed' quarks as said three
phased.
Since it is forces that dictate action, gravity as Einstein saw (in
his great
"blunder"), had to be also complemental-- and why the General
Relativity
is
flawed-- as Big Bang and many other contingent anomalies.
If it is the magnetic field that bends light, (Demenstrated with a magnet to the
screen of your monitor. But
don't try it unless your monitor is able to degaus
or de-magnitize.) as
slows to evoke dv/dt red-shift, behind star light penetration
would be more deflected near
the jets
of a fresh quasar than any stilled
coagulated cloud matters (with mutual
gravity) hovering at galaxy pole ends
due to anti-g with their complemental
disk matter. The `gamma bursters' likely
show (well beyond the disk)
these
anti-matter annihilations reflect they do get
back together with a
bit of
mutual `attractive' gravity gusto!
Noting that John Bell didn't get the chance to finish my experiment
request
(at least his excitement was obvious) to measure the net repulsion
between
koino and anti-matter, the galaxy disk/jets anomaly will need to do
for now.
Ask Arp.
At least our scenario continues to hold up-- after predicting the
jets
before
the Einstein Observatory went aloft, and Huchra's bubbles on nice even
600Mly
separations-- it all says much for cosmology, if rutty pedants would
take a
look-- beyond erred whimsical theory computer programs-- and of course,
tenure.
Sincerely, (and Merry Xmas!)
KTS
* note freed electron for the EPR experiments!
CC: Griest; Alcock
Kim Griest, et.al.
10/2/93
Kim Griest, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of California
San Diego, CA 92093
Re: MACHO dark matter
Dear
Sir:
(Sept. 25th SCIENCE NEWS)
Peripheral matter to our galaxy disk might be noted not in-line with
the disk
to define recoagulating complemental jet anti-matters for the MACHO
lensing
function noted. While either gravitational affect to evoke lensing
might be
noted, one could ask now how `finite' the star equivalent for same
might be?
Its relative distance from our galactic pole `ends', where jet matters
might
make a final deceleration to define the time for mutual attraction,
even to
the galaxy's opposite pole of like matter, showing gamma bursters along
the
way.
The condensation period for spewed matter with high initial velocity
may
require great epochs of time, where the galactic disk is pinched
together
by
right angle magnetic fields (cosmic bubble front) for early star
formation.
The said delayed grouping of spewed jet anti-matter as shadow matter
will
likely always remain elusive as will remain away from the disk.
It would be interesting to note if MACHO periods become shorter near
our
galaxy disk plane, where their maximum velocities occur. While doubting
if
gravity affects the lensing, (depite what Einstein believed) more
likely
is it
the magnetic field-- noting the dv/dt red shift of very high magnetic
fields
around initial galaxy/quasars in their generating primal EMPs. This
theory
will get its boost soon with the realization that `billiard ball'
matter
is
only magnetic standing waves-- as were condensed near quasar cores.
(to very
likely define the simple means to fusion!)
Sincerely,
KTS
CC: D/Z; Zylberajch; Alcock
Jan. 26,'93
Dept. of Astronomy
Attn: Sokolsky, et.al.
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Re: gamma bursters
Sirs:
(8 Jan. '93 SCIENCE)
While the grandest `Super Collider' is where jet matters collide
beyond
the
periphery of the galaxy disk (with a common gravity), such won't be
understood
by astronomy or physics until anti-g is recognized. Where Big Bang
is
essential for tenure, taboos have a way of going on for ever.
Einstein's
"blunder" with his General Relativity was because he was coerced by
peers-- as
he suspected, realizing all `forces' had a complemental aspect.
When proven correct with the Einstein Observatory showing the
predicted
jets
versus disk as complemental matters with anti-g between, such white
hole
quasar cores explained themselves as the expected bubbles (Huchra)
defining
the many Petite Bangs nicely separated on 600Mly intervals. Voids
(bubble
centers) only define what as where some primal EMP got started, for
decelerated standing wave-lets yet called `billiard balls'. Most unique
now,
cold fusion is undertsood and quite simple to evoke for the end of
another
tenured class-- in the petroleum business.
Arp's recent letter defines the pending huge embarrassment coming in
astronomy, where dv/dt (slowed) light in dense magnetic fields defines
the
quasar-- as most other red-shift enigma in astronomy. Sorry.
Sincerely,
KTS
CC: Cronin; Goodman; D/Z
3/31/93
R. Terlevich, et.al.
c/o The Royal Greenwich Observatory
Greenwich, England
Re: genetic white hole cores
Sir:
(SCIENCE: 19, March '93)
The rather conclusive sub-nature of matter as EM standing waves
makes
Black
Holes rather impossible, yet the more obvious genesis of quasars riding
dense
magnetic EMP fronts with complemental matter generation far more
appealing
now. To crush standing waves merely places them in the untenable
situation
of
unraveling, the underlying enigma of nuclear fission or fusion.
With Einstein's General Relativity theory defunct without its
complemental
aspect for anti-g to define the quasar/galaxy disk to jets anomaly
and the
relative weird mass of 3-phased quarks, a great paradigm shift can
be now seen
for astronomy-- now that physics is well into theirs. The dv/dt
red-shift
problem likely rests with decelerated light in dense magnetic fields,
not
gravity, which so defines the vast red shift of quasars-- not to say
that a
long voyage of light through a universe of Apriori primary magnetic
flux
doesn't also reduce the apparent spectral frequencies. (Star seeming to be
different in color
because of the size of it's magnetic field.) The likely often
reason
why the complemental jets are so little seen is the relavistic speeds
coming
towards us exceeds our spectral perception. By going away from us the
lowered
net dv/dt red shift allows such light to be more easily seen. (Bravo Roger.)
The spasm of star bursts in torqued ionized primal matter near a
quasar
core
should be expected where degenerated electrons (first EM harmonic
standing
wave) gets precipitated into heavier matter. With Huchra's cosmic
bubbles
nicely placed on 600 million light year intervals, there would appear
some
underlying cause-- as "one hand clapping" to evoke those vast EMPs
to begin
with! (and then all together since temporal sequence at c does not
exist!) (Is
this proof of God? All at once
accross this vast universe 600 million light years
apart at the same time. Only God
could do that.)
Sincerely,
KTS
P.S:
A few past quips might be timely to your article; over.
CC: B. Boyle; Blanford; Melnick; D/Z
Feb. 19,'94
H. C. von Baeyer
Dept. of Physics
William and Mary College
Williamsburg, VA 23185
Re:even more grand as a cosmic EMP!
Dear
Sir:
(March DISCOVER: `The Ocean--'
Sorry to bother again but your fine DISCOVER article again evokes
another
of
my responses. To perceive a liquid as primal magnetic EMP wave does
indeed
best define what Huchra calls the bubble front on which quasar riding
genetic
white holes evoke complemental matter as standing waves. Yet more
intriguing,
the anti-gravity factor that Einstein labeled his great blunder
(General
Relativity)
by allowing Bohr to deny the other negative sign on the equation!
The
jets versus galaxy disk said all that was needed-- as confirmed the
theory
with those Einstein Observatory's images.
Foaming quantized waves, from the said first harmonic electrons
through
the
third harmonic quarks not only disclose what generates time,
but many aspects
of how to unravel same in fusion now. The key was seen in what Einstein
said
about how he acquired his subjective visual (non-temporal right brain)
data
for the `new' (CQ) but more by the analogical correlate that you equate
with
Bronowski. The velocity discontinuity of one field force (magnetic
EMP
beginning at c) into its steepened wave shape to evoke quasar cores
for
subordinate waves with temporal existence, as another entropic state
makes
clear the question of how or Who clapped their one hand in infinite
space to
offer those many cosmic bubbles across this universe, and all at once!
(since
no time then prevailed to offer before or after) Colossal, stupendous?--(GOD!)
Indeed, when we occupy so small a space by comparison. DeBroglie should
have
been heeded long before the billiard-ball mentality got its start--
for its
neurotic continued dull round, as likely Blake would put it.
Sincerely again--
KTS REsearch
CC: DISCOVER; Wallerstein; D/Z
March 4,'94
P. Davies, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Adelaide
Adelaide, Australia
Re: "impedance" (SEDs)
Dear
Sir:
(4, Feb. SCIENCE: "Inertia:--)
There can be no "empty" space since what created matter of Itself
defines
that
Apriori as magnetic flux-- whatever billiard-ball mentality may wish
to call
EM standing waves. Einstein tried a couple times to define reality
but the
ensconced neurotic preferred to ignore it. His claimed great blunder
with his
General theory was indeed just that-- so now astronomy continues to
blunder
over complemental gravity, as quasar disk versus jets as complemental
primal
matter sources, riding vast EMP bubbles on neat 600M light year
intervals.
It
suggests (at least!) who clapped their hand for same. All forces have
opposite
signs, even one as Apriori flux to its so `impeded' standing-wave
matter
precipitates, to evoke `slowed' time and so a second ordered entropy
(via
3-phased trefoiled quarks) that we see locked into time. (Carefull Roger, so he
did not listen to you.)
Some old quips herewith might(?) mean something now, especially in
view
of the
6th Generation interfacing `computer'. (over)
Sincerely,
KTS REsearch
cc: phys/Q (series G); 3-dev(over); anti-G (Gen.Rel.)
CC: Puthoff; Davies, McDonald; Wesson;
3/12/94
Francesco Paresce, et.al.
Space Telescope Sc. Inst.
3700 San Martin Dr.,
Baltimore, MD 21218
Re: second order ejecti?
Dear Sir:
From the brief article (Feb.26, SC.NEWS), the young NOVA has the
ear-markings
of the more primal quasar, while maybe `petite' by comparison, the
complemental anti-matter ejecti appears to avoid the disk portion of
Cygni
1992. Has there been yet any calibrated ejection velocities noted
therewith
as
the said jets might be relavistic? We are now reasonably sure your
said
"obstacles" may be anti-gravity-- just as Einstein admitted with his
"blunder"
in the General Relativity theory where complemental signs need to be
applied
to ALL forces! Since fission and fusion evoke anti-matter during
koinomatter
unraveling such may be the answer. (Try looking at Chandra images.)
Sincerely,
KTS
March 14,'94
David Hobill, et.al.
Dept. of Astrophysics
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Re: chaotic black-box
Dear
Sir:
(SC. NEWS; Dec. 4,'93)
Suspecting Einstein saw his own blunder with his General Relativity
theory
(lacking complemental signs), albeit too late with his then peer
pressure,
used anti-g to define possible separation of complemental matters as
genetic
cores. Then thought evoked by EM disturbances, soon noted as EMP cosmic
fronts
(Huchra) for quasar white hole cores spewing those said matters in
very
different directions. The ejecti, even spin-UP with radial distance
of the
ionized disk matter in such primal dense magnetic field-- with
relavistic
ejection of `dark matter' jets, predicted before the Einstein
Observatory
went
aloft to prove same, is still stirring anxiety in most tenured
offices--
yet
spewing ancient arts.
Worse, the obvious standing wave for "billiard ball" mentality
precludes
understanding how to unravel same for fusion, to say little about what
Mendalyeev perceived with what de Broglie saw! Oh well, the freed
electron
(over) will soon define all clearly so the neurotic in science will
need to
sit down for a while. Maybe our bifurcated universe where fractal
reality
dictates what `precipitates' in our slow temporal condition, chaos
might
appear far more orderly, albeit under a growing overt conflict to now
only
appear chaotic to we kept naive (dumb) conscious RAS mind!
Sincerely,
KTS REsearch
cc: 3-dev(over)
CC: D/Z; Rugh; Berger; Hunter
Svend Erik Rugh, et.al.
Dept. of Astrophysics
Niels Bohr Inst.
Copenhagan, Denmark
Berger and Moncrief, et.al.
Dept. of Mathematics(?)
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520
R. Churchill, et.al.
Dept. of Mathematics
Hunter College
York City, NY
Next Page