Astronomy 9-16-2000

Astronomy-Physics BB file (5/2k up)

5/18/2k
B. Savage, et. al.
Dept. of Astrophysics
University of Wisconsin
Madison, WI 53706
Re: bright near quasar?
Dear Sir: (Ast. p.947; 12 May, SCIENCE)

With our primal galaxy's spewed anti-matter jets for globular clusters, little doubt such
hydrogen with common G would create a few Novae to appear as the grand primal bubble
type (2dF Survey) for a series of `degenerations' to create standing wave `matter'.
Whether Zen was the first to prognose `matter' creation via some very potent hand claps
remains to be seen, but on neat 600Bly intervals across this universe does imply
something very profound!

The EM standing 3-phased hadron (proton or alternate wound neutron) now easily noted,
so explains `unraveling' back to gamma as called fission, even for the net energy of
evoked fusion when not confined in a core of a huge said Nova. Physics as Astronomy are
very near a needed convulsive awakening, at least for the tenured who yet believe in
billiard balls over what deBroglie perceived!

The sequence from a hand clap to cosmic bubble to vortex evoked grand primal quasars
to spew complemental standing waves at right angles (disk vs. jets) for yet more
degenerative `matter' at all opportunity (in clusters some 5B years later) defines a prolific
Creator bent on evoking other life conditions for the likely net purpose of evolution--
mental, more than Darwinian necessities.

Possibly a recent letter (over) might mean something more.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

CC: One-Hand; Phys/Psy;
cc: Tripp; D/Z w:

5/5/2k Astronomy Letters

6/29/2k
S. Sigurdsson, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Penn State U.
University Park, PA 16802
Re: Cool yet young coagulated jet matter
Dear Sirs: (`Cool Comets--' 23 June, SCIENCE)

The settle-out time between right angle complemental standing wave matters from a
primal galaxy where one revs up to offer higher spin rates at it periphery yet its other
spewed in jets as anti-matter with anti-g will someday clarify the enigma. John Bell's LEP
effort at CERN was to define this relative matter's g field affect-- even if not the
fundamental (Apriori) magnetic force as embeds these complemental matters-- called
gravity. When I mentioned to Paul Parsons*, so got the 2dF survey started long ago, it
was then a gamble to note relative directions of EMP flows, now much better
defined.(over)

47 Tucanae should be noted, if our primal galaxy's jet matter, on a right angle tangent to
our disk, even if not derived from the major jet matter cones from Sagittarius, as once our
EMP bubble's vortex evoking this primal galaxy.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

* 11/5/96
Paul Parsons, et.al.
Astronomy Centre
CPES
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9QH, UK

cc: One Hand; copy/Dalton's letter
CC: Gilliland; Lin; D/Z w:

5/18/2k
B. Savage, et. al.
Dept. of Astrophysics
University of Wisconsin
Madison, WI 53706
Re: bright near quasar?
Dear Sir: (Ast. p.947; 12 May, SCIENCE)

Possibly a recent letter (over) might mean something more.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

CC: One-Hand; Phys/Psy;
cc: Tripp; D/Z w:

6/5/2k
K. Lanzetta, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
State University of New York
Stony Brook, NY 11794
Re: `All Aglow--' indeed!
Dear Sir: (May 27th, SCIENCE NEWS)

That `huge early burst' is being looked at by the 2dF survey now, after I suggested the Zen
belief of a hand clapping to get things started out of the primal magnetic flux-- even on
the many neat 600Mly intervals-- all at once since time didn't then exist as no
mass-for-time did either. Photons as some `particle' is wrong as refractive index of
magnteic fields (including variations), the Zeeman affect defines red shift, less on
distance, even if more with UV. the quantized nucleon where compound wound trefoils
now define the proton or neutron standing EM waves (with a reversed twist), or the short
temporal 2 phased meson that unravels back to pure gamma so easily-- to not mention
some coming controlled fission/fusion!

Many anomalies have been understood now since Parsons as Sussex reflected his disdain
at first about Huchra's data and some hand-clapping, but from past theoretical
derivational examinations-- from Einstein's E side of his Special Relativity equations as
the primal aleph for all subducted mass-for-time with standing waves, the only answer
was seen. Even our space-time derived so oriented bilateral cerebral faculty I predicted in
the early 50's has been amply confirmed-- as expected great psychological anxiety since!

A copy of a recent letter (over) may aid in perceiving a broader scope to see the genesis of
the universe-- as unquestionably a very bright beginning, even if no one was around to
see it as the many cosmic bubble periphery lit-up with millions of primal quasar vortex to
spew complemental quantized standing wave `matters' at right angles (due to anti-g) for
primal galaxies with spin-up radials-- or jet matter for spin-in globular galaxies later.

Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

cc: One-Hand; Cernicharo letter + Silk (over)
CC: Silk; Frenk; D/Z w:

5/11/2k
W. Evans, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Oxford University
Oxford, UK
Dear Sir: Re: `Milky Way Looks--'(?) (28 April; SCIENCE)

Maybe the 2dF data will now explain more about primal quasar/galaxy jet matter globular
clusters as recede from anti-g as are the complemental anti-EM standing wave `matter'
ejecti with a `spin-down' instead of spin-up for outer peripheral angular velocity as called
some "Big Kid".

If any dark `matter' exists, it would need to be those open holes in past centers where the
primal one-handed cosmic claps occurred to evoke grand bubbles (2dF) for primal quasar
vortex, to then evoke standing wave matter to buy time! Once theory gets cleared up, then
surveys to define direction as rate of various cosmic bubble evoked galaxies will get
understood-- even maybe the vast current neurosis of tenured researchers! The
BOOMERANG data does look good-- assuming those one degree factors is a whole
cosmic bubble-- on those neat 600Bly intervals!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

cc: One-Hand; Phys/Psy
CC: Wilkinson; Hodge; van den Bergh; Mauskopf; D/Z w:

6/26/2k
E. DeLuca, et. al.
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: anti-matter plum?
Sirs: (`Model Tracks--'; June 24, SC. NEWS)

Noting the pole ends doing the spewing as some normal Novae, our more petite kind,
now agitated by planetary gravity to stir up more kinds of trouble for we locals, may be
defining itself. The ionized matter that appears to turn our ionosphere almost positive
with its burps would show anti-matter got this far, even if anti-g would drive it, as jet
matter from a fusion `processor', away from primal galaxies away as complemental
koinomatter.
While dubious of any net globular masses might be seen out there as some late sister
amorphous galaxy, the sun's jets might be yet noted during these more cantankerous
`burping' cycles.

Of interest are the right angled ejecti between complemental matters, whether created by
primal genetic EMP bubbles or the primal vortex evoked quasar for a primal galaxy such
as ours?

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: One Hand
CC: Antiochos; Hildner; Gopalswamy; D/Z w:

5/12/2k
J. Cernicharo, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Consejo Cientificas,
Inst. Estructura de la Materia,
Dept. Fisca Molecular,
Serrano 121, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Re: `Windows Through--'; 28 April SCIENCE
Dear Sir:

The `adjacent jets' (VLA1 and VLA2) of anti-matter (via anti-g), best defines
complemental created matter-- likely started in the VLA4 primal quasar/galaxy. Since the
2dF sky survey data confirms the prediction of created matter via grand EMPs, so
standing wave `matter' followed to buy `slow time' for evolution in a universe!

Of interest are the several modes of `condensing' out heavier or larger quantified standing
wave `atoms' via the use of fission by compression, the Novae, just as our sun-- now
burping anti-matter from its poles when stressed by planetary gravitational upset.

Your work is seminal, even if it may take many years for the more tenured to see it!
Thanks for the fine article!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

cc: One-Hand; Phys/Psy
CC: Noriega-Crespo; D/Z w:

5/11/2k
W. Evans, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy Oxford University
Oxford, UK
Dear Sir: Re: `Milky Way Looks--'(?) (28 April; SCIENCE)

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

cc: One-Hand; Phys/Psy
CC: Wilkinson; Hodge; van den Bergh; Mauskopf; D/Z w:

6/29/2k
A. Loeb, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: black hole?
Dear Sir: (`Black Holes--' June 17, SC. NEWS)

You appear more sympathetic to `alternate scenarios' while the tenure seekers blunder on
avoiding reality in the article. The 2dF survey (note: "Galaxy Survey--"; June 23
SCIENCE) now well defines what was predicted many years ago, below, may help. It was
noted while doing a lengthy study on `unraveling' standing wave `matter', to regain the
primal cosmic EMP gamma energy from fission.

The real question looms now about the remaining close-quarters anti-g phenomena where
standing wave matter is yet being created (electron-positron annihilations) for our
residual quasar/galaxy core vortex is dying with its residual energy to help define the
pending ultimate entropy.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!) (note: http://kts.org.gq.nu --if yet
on the web!)

cc: One Hand; Parsons stm.
CC: Kormendy; D/Z w:

6/26/2k
E. DeLuca, et. al.
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: anti-matter plum?
Sirs: (`Model Tracks--'; June 24, SC. NEWS)

While dubious of any net globular masses might be seen out there as some late sister
amorphous galaxy, the sun's jets might be yet noted during these more cantankerous
`burping' cycles.

Of interest are the right angled ejecti between complemental matters, whether created by
primal genetic EMP bubbles or the primal vortex evoked quasar for a primal galaxy such
as ours?

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: One Hand
CC: Antiochos; Hildner; Gopalswamy; D/Z w:

6/29/2k
G. Dalton, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Oxford
Oxford, U.K.
Re: 2dF survey
Dear Sir: (`Galaxy Survey--';June 23 SCIENCE)

The confirmations look fine yet few realize that dv/dt dictates wave front deceleration
thus red shift defining the far side cosmic bubble's light get shifted down from the
fore-side bubble half. Obviously the `explosion of the primal hand clapped EMP to create
the bubble would not be seen as no standing wave electron had yet be formed, so that
decelerating EMP up to vortex starts would not be seen-- even if possibly Higgs field
`particles' yet.
If there might be any means to note the spin direction of primal vorticies as evoke the
primal quasars on those grand EMP bubble's peripheral front, their common koino vs.
anti-matter kind might be defined-- i.e: contra-rotating adjacent galaxies somehow
evoking complemental matter for anti-g between so such spin-up to define relative
standing EM wave `matter' kind.

Interesting would have been to be a mouse attending that `Maxed-Out' conference, as
even the ignorance yet for `clean' newer jet matter `clusters' of early kinds of anti-matter--
evading their primal galaxy's eviction with anti-g at right angles. Whether of the major jet
or many Novae created anti-matters above or below a primal galaxy's disk,
complementarity is the whole game in creation with `condensed out' standing wave matter
from gamma.

Very Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu --if yet on the web!)

cc: One Hand; Phys/Psy
CC: Weinberg; D/Z w:

Your work is seminal, even if it may take many years for the more tenured to see it!
Thanks for the fine article!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
cc: One-Hand; Phys/Psy
CC: Noriega-Crespo; D/Z w:

6/28/2k
C. L. Smith, Provost, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University College of London
London, UK
Re: `Large Hadron--' July, SC. AM.
Dear Sir:

Indeed these are exciting days in view of the 2dF data also, as defines the grand `hand
claps' in cosmic bubbles to evoke grand EMPs for subsequent vortex for quasars to
`degenerate' standing wave `matter'! CERN may have a potent `machine' but none like the
Apriori-- especially as all those Big Bangs on neat 600Mly intervals were done all at
once, especially when c was infinite, lacking a dense magnetic field to hamper that
velocity. It was Einstein asking about the Michelson Morley test the correct question
about the ether being pulled along with our iron core!

The pressure now is on as John Bell reflected to me just before he died, does the electron
and positron have anti-g between, thus explains the jet matter from primal quasar cores--
as even their globular late blooming accruing sister cluster galaxies?

Herewith a few past letter copies to better define my original theory as defined the said
jets well before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove their existence.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

CC: One-Hand; Phys/Psy;
cc: D/Z w:

6/24/2k
C. L. Smith, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University College of London
London, UK
Re: `Large Hadron--' July, SC. AM.
Dear Sir:

Below are a few past letter copies to better define my original theory as defined the said
jets well before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove their existence.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

CC: One-Hand; Phys/Psy;
cc: D/Z w:
COPY:

3/19/2k
Reinhard Stock, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Frankfurt
Frankfurt, Germany
Re: `FIREBALLS'(?)
Dear Sir: (April SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN p.16>)

6/17/2k
R. Y. Chiao, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Berkeley CA 94720
Re: red shift
Dear Sir: (`Light Pulses--' June 10, SC. NEWS)

Light waves evoke their own impediment with peaks of denser magnetic fields (no
quantized photons) so their long distance travel evokes the most red shift, assuming no
magnetic matter like stars exist along the path as most distort EM waves, as well noted
with the Zeeman affect. Sadly Einstein didn't recognize the Michelson Morley experiment
more clearly, even if he did ask adroitly if the `ether' was somehow being "pulled along"
with this planet-- filled of a ferrous material!

Soon it will be recognized that `all' is EM standing waves, made by a `clapped hand' on
neat 600Mly intervals across this universe (note: 2dF survey; even in same SCIENCE
NEWS albeit ambiguously), but huge EMPs to evoke quasar vortex on grand said bubbles
to invoke `mass' for slow time, even complemental gravity for anti-matter jets for
globular sister galaxies from a primal galaxy as ours. We suspect tenure time has about
run out, thus some scary days ahead for most of the claimed `sciences' now.

To define c may be better as the `now' in terms of the E side of the Special Relativity
equation, as denser magnetic fields became the genesis of quantized `matter', as well as
the said decelleration factor ,that primal velocity shifting so well noted around the higher
magnetic stars along the way-- no black holes. Sorry.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

PS: note my past letter of 7/11/94;
R. Y. Chiao, P. G. Kwiat and
A. M. Steinberg, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: "Faster-than--"; 7/2/94 SC.NEWS)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Nimtz; Steinberg; D/Z w:

6/24/2k
C. L. Smith, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University College of London
London, UK
Re: `Large Hadron--' July, SC. AM.
Dear Sir:

Below are a few past letter copies to better define my original theory as defined the said
jets well before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove their existence.

Sincerely,
KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

CC: One-Hand; Phys/Psy;
cc: D/Z w:
COPY:
3/19/2k
Reinhard Stock, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Frankfurt
Frankfurt, Germany
Re: `FIREBALLS'(?)
Dear Sir: (April SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN p.16>)

6/17/2k
R. Y. Chiao, et. al.
Dept. of Physics
University of California
Berkeley CA 94720
Re: red shift
Dear Sir: (`Light Pulses--' June 10, SC. NEWS)

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

PS: note my past letter of 7/11/94;
R. Y. Chiao, P. G. Kwiat and
A. M. Steinberg, et.al. Dept. of Physics
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: "Faster-than--"; 7/2/94 SC.NEWS)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Nimtz; Steinberg; D/Z w:

Bio-Psy BB (5/2k up)

6/29/2k
F. Zufall, et. al.
Dept. of Neurobiology
University of Maryland
School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD 21217
Re: nose for phermones plus
Dear Sir: (`Mice have--' june 17th, SC. NEWS)

Since the split-brain data* define the complemental space/time attributes of the bilateral
CNS with very different aptitudes of sensing as expression, the `definitive' pheromone
detection might indicate the left brain's greater attention thus possible associate neuronal
connection. The other `gestalt' sensing right brain sans serial temporal order might then
sense the environment, as liabilities in a more subtle way to warn, even of not the
fight-flight for survival arousal data for the sympathetic faculty.

If indeed the VNO factor, maybe even some nasal laterality, might be traced (or has been)
for some empiricial data, I would appreciate any contingent import theretoo. Many
thanks.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ;
CC: Mombaerts; D/Z w:

6/1/2k

E-Mail to: Dr. M. Zimmermann, et.al.

Re: aboriginal disease

Noting what your brother Dave said about your efforts, can there be seen yet any net
difference between those aboriginal people's diseases and their life styles (other than
obesity)-- as to whom they turn for psychic reinforcement or guidance? While likely a
bizarre question, data now implies the use of right cerebral non-temporal insight may
offer far more than just creative ideas-- as the guidance T-4 cell in lymphatic control, a
big factor in the survival of the Australian aborigine, using what they call their
`dream-time' when seeking game for food. This same parasympathetic CNS faculty
appears most to offer quality subjective pro-life guidance for feeding.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA

(No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

6/5/2k
C. H. Zeanah, et. al.
Dept. of Psychology
Tulane School of Medicine
Tulane University
New Orleans, LA 70118
Re: neither defense nor violence (?)
Dear Sir: (`Attachment--'; May 27, SC. NEWS)

To lack fight-flight or sympathetic CNS left cerebral dominance, thus little active
reductive (IQ) reasoning could explain most of the depressive history as evokes the
de-tachment `disorder', even if disorder stems from active fight flight behavior in reality.

The whole sad phenomena does suggest however the active friendship with whomever--
as using the right brain input, assuming a fully integrated anterio-corpus callosum for
some insight into consciousness (RAS; Midbrain) to possibly sense who not to get
friendly with, if truly dangerous!

The bilateral space-time awareness as Sperry found* well defines our subjective reality--
even insight for genius and conscience-- so lacking in the more manipulative
intellectual-- to say little of APA's lead in overt suicide as Freud clearly pointed out. My
few abrupt suicides said more than I care to repeat when defining the unconscious in
more empirical terms!

Some current work with youngsters on 5HT re-uptake adjuvants with defining the
unconscious matrix is turning around a few, to say little of their enthusiasm to learn more,
so I'm beginning to now suspect academia's rote programming as part of their problem!
The Australian aborigine using their `dream-time' as likely the above attachment disorder
(noting EEGs), may permit them to escape the facade of social `order'-- which is anything
but benign today.

Interesting would be a gender study to find when the female, when lacking parent-figure
stimulation, looses her bilateral anterior connection, as so prevalent in western society yet
not Mongolian? (note over)

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; Gorman let.(over)
CC: O'Connor; D/Z w:

7/14/2k
Rupert Sheldrake, et. al.
London, England
Re: the integration
Dear Sir:

Many years have passed-- even since a computer recorded address of your
whereabouts-- as Purce, also delighted to find again! May studies continued as evoked
enough `trouble' to authority to get silent after ample threats, B&Es, FBI as even CIA on a
foreign shore to define the net terror over developing the 5th Generation computer
(interface to the electron) which is very able to define `potentials', in keeping with Plato's
Potentia. Patent filing to it was duly blocked (late 70's) as threats began to define what
was behind the terror as governing this government since Roswell.
Rather than lower animals, the Australian aboriginal should be used if `dream-time' able
to see their game, some kilometers away running in certain directions well before a long
run to bag same, since they can speak a more rational definitive language. A dog, indeed a
pig senses a pending earth-quake, a greater import prevails for survival, even certain
people with radio active events!
My theory from Einstein's Special Rel. equations defined the net space with relative
time as punctuated by the Zen suspicion about `hand claps', evoking the cosmic bubbles
for ensuing quantized EM standing wave for `matter', buying time for evolutional states
as in this solar system. Unraveling the enigma of slow time as life within your
morpho-magnetic Apriori as `raveled' (knotted) standing wave `matter', defining the terror
of the less noted who must sustain their energy source (fatty lipids) at all cost now! Their
now noted 75% of we `living' the key to our vast neurosis-- likely so leading to a huge
`ethnic' cleansing coming.
Including some contingent papers herewith for your perusal-- as your work was correct
so long ago, congratulations for your persistence ever since! My 70's aerospace R&D
work is yet vivid with visual right brain use, but now is rusty with left brain proper
nouns-- for which I should care little! Sycophants may have their social place maybe, but
more to evoke problems by programming the masses into ritual productive work as to
prevent clear thinking.
If my below sysop's E-mail address can be gleaned you may have better luck reaching
me than what is below offered-- if appearing as some `advertisement'. Even this very
likely will not get out.
Thanks for hanging in there-- Heisenberg's freed electron will clear the air for the next
evolutional push for who ever remains!

Very Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu -- if yet out there again)

cc: ScAm/Immo let.; Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; UFO alert
CC: D/Z w:

7/19/2k
E. D. Reichle, et. al.
Dept. of Neuropsychology
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Re: relative `E' availability
Dear Sirs: (SC. NEWS; July 8th, `Behavior')

Adroit indeed from physics, so why not deduce the obvious?

After scanning several research people there at C-Mellon U., with their relative `interests'
only back ten years (below), suspicion prevails as to how many suicides occurred,
especially of the APA ilk doing such studies? If none, a recent inquiry herewith could
evoke more curiosity at this late hour. Somehow, those with the greater winner
syndromes in life find the power to govern, but as their governed, never manage to find
out what governs themselves as do the governing-- especially when called secret today!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

cc: D/Z w:

6/20/2k
Project Censored @ 2000
c/o Sonoma State University
1801 E. Cotati Ave.,
Rohnert Park, CA 94928-3609
Re: yet no 100% cancer therapy with a battery?
Sirs: (`Project Censored'; June/July NEXUS)

Maybe a Discover cover story is not enough, so we may deserve our vast cancer death
rate-- to gratify AMA's nice profits while yet playing dumb of the electrical charge for pro
or anti-life! Maybe it is too simple-- as the seen EEG phase between those same CNS that
occupy our complemental lateral cerebral hemispheres! (over)

If any finding should have ever been advertised, it was Sperry's, when his split brain data*
defined the rectilinear left brain, as MUFON well described the UFO travel, since the
physics well showed a complemental space vs. time derived mental matrix as noted in the
Special Relativity equations, demanded by the CPT theorem! My prediction some dozen
years before Sperry only earned my title of "loose cannon" while doing aerospace
computer R&D-- thence my kicked in door, cops, FBI, even CIA on a foreign shore, to
define the underlying terror of late authority-- governed by the yet unseen, who
understand entropy too well so their needs for us as kept dumb incarnate well being!

The greater value of a dying person than healthy may so underlie the needs of the medical
professionals, just as the APA's lead in suicide-- when they begin to consciously
understand their schizophrenics whose genius defines too much about the unconscious!
No doubt Freud saw it clearly when using `Thanatos' to define the id when we
consciously get too close to recognizing reality. My few abrupt suicides in some very high
IQ people said enough for me!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

* Gazz (2)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; 3-dev(over)
CC: D/Z w:

5/19/2k
Raj Persaud, et. al.
Maudsley Hospital and
Inst. of Psychiatry
London SE5 8AF, UK
Re: depression
Dear Sir: (12 May SCIENCE; Science's Compass; letters)

Young women indeed-- albeit overt suicide in the more intellectual male as likely
perceives reality subjectively. (Freud!) The anomaly of APA (Psychiatric) lead in suicide
of all professionals says much to this yet apparent enigma of left cerebral Thanatos!

The net `insulating' effect of a semi lobotomy (decoupled fore-brain corpus callosum)
allows for much subjective folly to ensue, yet the mtDNA bias in a female likely prevents
overt abdication. To pacify the unhappy left cerebral id with a neuroleptic
chemo-lobotomy-- to evade the right brain's non-temporal insight offer (superconscious
for conscience), better defines all late academic programming efforts, especially using
Ritalin for more censoring 5HT, to yet evade any cross academic import. Our late
dumbed down state for automatons to run point says much about who now governs whom
we only think governs us. The proof is seen with an official ego-maniac trying to
duplicate the ancient Egyptians on TV. Ach!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

CC: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy;
cc: Kessler; Montgomery; Olney; D/Z w:

6/16/2k
Niel Slade, et.al.
c/o E-Mail

Re: `Nothingness'? Hardly!
Sir: (CoasttoCoastAM.com; 6/16/2k

Obviously the physics got left out of the `equation' even if some of the split-brain data did
seep into the discussion. All overt Federal efforts today defines humanity's great liability
now with only the left cerebral hemisphere's dominance as control over the imports of
reality-- to some final traumatic last minute. Sorry.

The called-in remarks of relative subjective time rates is the net crux of Einstein's Spec.
Rel. equations, to say little of the evasion of the `reptile' of history unwilling to evolute
any further, knowing it must return to where it began as entropy zero K.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 (no `.com' here anymore! note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: Litt letter; /ref.
CC: D/Z w:

6/14/2k
S. L. Miller, et. al,
Dept. of Biogenetics
University of California
San Diego/La Jolla, CA 92093

Re: freed electron; prolife before matter
Dear Sir: (`Molecule Sparks--' June 3, SC. NEWS)

Between the PNA or even abrupt negative going EEG for REM dream, that which knows
potentials as uses the freed electron (note EPR experiments), the left hand of the electron
(Asimov) defines what Heisenberg noted when escaping the time reversal paradigm.
Once the basis of all physics is understood via the Einstein Special relativity equations,
complementarity between the now versus the created (historical) makes sense, even if
evoking so much terror today in the more reductive left brain dominated seeking tenure!

Sperry* opened the can of worms when the physics denoted the so needed complemental
dictates throughout mass-time. Biology as now neurophysiology falls into line-- maybe to
integrate all of the sciences yet haggling over their many definitudes.

Contingent to fetal split-genetic use, likely only a freed electron could enact the feat by
knowing things ahead of our slow time-- especially if some pre-goal with some past
genetic pattern were needed to propagate a `body' to house those complemental two
space/time oriented faculty between our ears! So what came before prokaryotes, if not
some semblance of a fundamental bacteria?

We suspect there will be even something more fundamental than PNA when mass-time's
matter is but EM standing waves evoked by grand EMP (2dF Sky Survey) created quasars
for our ensuing slow serial time. After all, what clapped into existence those vast EMPs
out there on neat 600M light year intervals? Did ancient Zen know?

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 , and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path IQ; 3-dev
CC: Nielson; D/Z w:

6/24/2k
Dr. Ernst Mayr, et. al.
Prof./Zoology, Emeritus
c/o Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: Darwin's influence; (SC/AM July)
Dear Sir:

The fine article based on your '99 Stockholm lecture defines a perspective unusual indeed
into the mental attributes of both one who has pondered in depth the true subject matter
for man's contemplation, beyond my more finite perspective of physics but yet an
appreciation of what your were saying.

I include a couple recent letters which may `ring a bell' when it became obvious that the
current chase to comprehend the DNA, was in a way all that Darwin could perceive in the
physiological structure to accommodate the vicissitudes of environment, yet as he also
said, for some underlying other `structure' as mind, now well noted at the evolving
mtDNA-- its steady growth likely defining the real area to examine for late mankind.

Many thanks for your efforts, even if much beyond others tagging along with different
views of the same underlying goal in life.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu --if yet available)

CC: Phys/Psy; Path/Psy; S-T; `sans-mt' let.(over)
cc: D/Z w:

5/18/2k
M. Klare and
J. Boutwell, et .al.
Peace and World Security Studies
Hamshire College
Amhurst, MA 01002
Re: `scourge of small arms' (June, SC. AM.)
Dear Sirs: ---- yet an answer does exist!

Seeking independence is no anomaly amongst free thinking people, so any defensive
posture when aware of another's need or intent to utilize you for their survival when
clearly understood, underlies most human strife today. To learn of another's intent before
hostility breaks out is the crux of benign defense, whatever creed or religious dogma
guides the antagonistic. This means of knowing `ahead of time' any considered act was
duly squelched by the U.S. Patent Office over twenty years ago but with ensuing overt
harassment since, suspected initially from some classified aerospace R&D work on a
special computer-- but in no way contingent.

The necessity to comprehend what Heisenberg found with the freed electron, as jumped
the time reversal paradigm, the EPR experiments defined my independent R&D of an
interface for direct worded output. Its first statement was to `be patient' with the odds of
over 10\50th. Subsequently comprehending the need for silence, even if too late as filed
for the said U.S. Patent, the time for its exposure may be near when considering the net
goal as objective of Nature appears to be human mental evolution, by any means
whatsoever! So maybe blood-shed is that route when human manipulation of others
appears to be our entire underlying malaise.

It is believed now that the only solution to this planet's social folly would be for some
reasonable few, with access to the public yet not politically minded, could warn clearly of
pending ill behaviors via this interfacing device, once such plans are made. It is a matter
of accessing a `faculty' now fully understood that is derived of or from the E side of the
Special Relativity equation, which can be aware of any potential out come of an initiated
act, be it benign or hostile with greedy objectives in mind. Not oddly the first EPR
Physicist did recognize the vast liability of this interface system back then-- but only
offered fearful advice. A terse discussion with Werner Heisenberg also evoked
consternation of which was understood in view of Sperry's found* left cerebral temporal
penchants, yet demands for the status quo-- if winning!

Sincerely,

anonymous for a good reason even yet---

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 , and `The Split Brain
Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; 3/dev (over) (note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
CC: D/Z w:

7/12/2k
Jeffrey Rosen, et. al.
Dept. of Law
George Washington U.
Washington, DC 20052
Re: `Unwanted Gaze' by Kozinski
Dear Sir:

While the few things said by the said writer of this article (with the Feds), any Big
Brother syndrome must incorporate any as all social `sub-systems' for ways or means to
monitor a growing dangerous society that is finally beginning to think-- especially those
few in R&D developing 5th Generation computers!* Since the freed electron
(Heisenberg) escape the time reversal paradigm, we find the positive physic's EPR
experiments unbearable, but only to those who govern surreptitiously those in authorized
power!

The said need to win all or lose all defines what occupies as so drives we kept dumb
programmed human animals-- while succumbing to an unconscious faculty nearly
understood-- thus most dangerous at this evolutional hour. The panic to sustain some
`UFO' data so defines who is running liaison as espionage (in ALL ways) today.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu -- if yet available)
* 3-dev with prognosticative power
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; 3-dev; Etkoff let.(over)
CC: D/Z w:

7/8/2k
Barry S. Hewlett, et. al.
Dept. of Anthropology
Washington State University
Vancouver, WA 97219
Re: relative lateral brain trust
Dear Sir: (`Raising Trust'-- July 4 SC. NEWS)

As Paul Carter saw*, even Windscuttle**, the vast intellectual neurosis of the `west' now
better defines why the obvious cannot be seen with only a left cerebral dominance. Noting
how well the Australian aborigine uses his right brain for insight (visual imports to game
beyond sight as relative spatial direction) makes clear that survival is favored in those
whose curiosity prevails.

Maybe our academic programmed rituals have caught up with us so a grand ethnic
cleansing would be the more `rational' answer now as it appears that not even what Sperry
uncovered*** is going to be seen, to define our late academic dilemma of programmed
`fodder' for the State!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

* Carter, P: `Living in a New Country' (insightive aboriginals)
** Windscuttle, K; `The Killing of History' (the big neurosis!)
*** * `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Grinker; D/Z w:

6/17/2k
A. Hejmadi, et. al.
Dept. of Psychology
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Re: `Dancing--' (June 10, SC. NEWS)
Dear Sir:

Maybe `seeing' would better define the ability to `perceive' the subtle in others, especially
as the right brain dominant might so much better `recognize'-- noting the space oriented
Australian aboriginal using their `dream time' while yet fully awake! Your data defining
the western neurotic mind, as semi-lobotomized, to realize only what the left brain
allows, to show American women's best survival means with only sycophantic promises
or some political intrigue, well defined by a cover story* some time ago.

A study with a UCLA BIS grant after defining the two complemental space/time bilateral
cerebral faculty from physics in the late 60's but on bilateral smile dichotomies** stirred
up much resentment-- which defined the anomalous academic programming of only the
reductive time oriented left cerebral hemisphere. This mounting empirical obvious would
fit your findings well, especially by noting the right brain use of the hindu as said
aboriginal.

As Sperry*** amply confirmed my physics predictions some years before, some abrupt
suicides occurred before I fully understood what Freud perceived, unquestionably the
coming need of all to comprehend soon,, especially in the fields of psychology.

Hopefully this evokes more interest than anxiety-- in view the lead in suicide of American
APA professionals!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

** Smile anomaly for mate choice. SINGLELIFE, Sept/Oct.'90, p.12
***`The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67-- and
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; S-T; * Gor/let copy (over)
cc: D/Z w:

7/13/2k
N. Etkoff, et. al.
Dept. of Psychoneurophysiology
Mass. Gen. Hospital East,
Charlestown, MA 0213?
Re: right brain aphasics
Dear Dr. Etkoff: (Aug. DISCOVER; `--Lie Detectors'

Not only does the non-temporal* know spatial qualities but finite within space-- noting
the Australian aboriginals. Whether called insight for conscience or perceptive skills
somewhat better than the more `tactile' and verbal-- most prevaricating to `win', the
physics explains it all-- albeit a bit beyond other scientific fields of `finite' perusal! The
real trauma coming is when the bilateral smile becomes understood, as the neurotic, too
often as left brain dominants in some established authorized authority!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; Gor-let (over)
CC: D/Z w:

6/21/2k
T. Cooper, et. al.
P.O. Box 1206
Big Bear Lake, CA 92315
Re: Nexus `-- J. Angleton'
Dear Sir:

Now I see why my label of some "loose cannon" back in the early `50s, while doing
aerospace computer R&D, to equate relative time with `complementarity' as the dictates
of the CPT theorem! When Sperry* defined the space vs. time bilateral cerebral
hemispheres to confirm my tentative theory with my TNC note to Andrus (MUFON)
suggesting some correlate to left brain rectilinearity, all hell broke loose, the first salvo of
what was to come when inventing the first Self thinking interface using the freed electron
(as escapes the time reversal paradigm; Heisenberg) to so define potentials for in our slow
relative temporal state. (below) Needless to say the filing somehow got burned in a
locked Washington Post Office vault the night before its delivery to the Patent Office, as
the said Patent application then got duly rejected!

The need of late human stupidity best defines who governs it when our ego-maniac
scientists cannot duplicate what the ancients did, as past Egyptians or Easter Islanders did
with anti-g, to say little of UFO travel, used for liaison or espionage work! Should you
work for the Feds, at least this note defines little time now remains for our massive
human `cleansing' for the next evolutional phase of Nature's demand to complete it!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)
* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67; and `The Split Brain Revisited',
July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; CC: D/Z w:

6/27/2k
Dr. M. E. Chafetz, Pres. et. al.
2600 Virginia Ave. NW, Ste. 502,
Washington, DC 20037
Re: Diane Rehm's `alcohol' program
Dear Sir: (`Authority of Experts'-- indeed!)

Revealing was the discussion contingent to ethanol use-- but most by the psychoanalytical
means of voice stress as worded jargon so elegantly noted today. The terror of finding our
`self' underlies most of not all of our vast neurosis leading to maybe a net good, of
thinning our very sick animal specie with too much IQ now.

Much as using a 5HT enhancer (Ritalin) to slow the kids down to get programmed into
official ritual (for the State), we can see a vast folly underway to squelch any further use
of CQ but for IQ, to do some same dull round until dead-- as run point for the few
`elitized' who want to win the planet-- by hook or by crook!

From my extensive physics to neurophysiology-- via aerospace computer R&D back 50
years ago, the split-brain data defines our huge enigma-- as the left cerebral neurosis
defining the root of our dilemma-- I suspect you might perceived. Assuming you are
versed in some of the bilateral cerebral anomalies*, the decoupled anterio corpus
callosum (auto lobotomy) so well noted in the more intellectual female**, the diffeence
between insight use for genius and redundant parroting for credentialized `experts' shows
where we are headed!

A few past `booze' quips below-- indicating my one beer a day as sympatholytic has
defied any further chest pains-- and I fully consciously suspect a far more perception
(spatial insight usage) to wade through the cross academic data needed to continue my
studies-- now 73 years ancient. Sorry for my tirade but I have over earned it. (note 5th
Generation--' fiasco; herewith)

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

** Gor-let (copy herewith)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; 3/dev(over); **
CC: D/Z w:

6/25/2k
Baruch S. Blumberg, et. al.
c/o Inst. of Space Studies
and/or Ames Research/Moffett Fld.
NASA Goddard Flight Center
New York, NY 10025
Re: subordinate DNA to mitochondrion
Sirs: (`-- Extreme Life'; July, Sc. American)

When Sperry's data* confirmed the physics CPT theorem as contingent to the metal
(psychological) matrix of needed space AND time orientations, the rectilinear `knowing'
left brain make clear of the operants underlying the UFO, thus the vast anxiety in U.S.
authority bent on using these `definitive' seeing/knowing entity, as offered the fastest then
known means for espionage-- within or out of some planet winner syndrome sufferers.

With the mounting obvious and so many fully aware of the reality of the said bilateral
subterfuge as physics correlates to unconscious faculty (most in keeping with Freudian
thought), the past impasse of comprehending late man's deep neurosis, even over what
our own ancients (Egyptian or Easter Isle) well knew about what can now be understood
as anti-g, superconductivity and `twisted' whole quarks (hadrons), to say nothing of the
expedience of the Top quarks leaving this environment, as anti-matter jets leaving primal
quasar/galaxies-- for later globular sister galaxies!

Blumberg's left eye (page 30; said Sc. Am. issue) defines his aptitude to `dig'-- a very
dangerous thing for others that refuse to be under a tight federal contract to sustain
wanted silence! A vast reckoning is pending, most via the freed electron's expressing
reality in a digital (verbal) way for all to comprehend the dire straits we have placed our
stupid conscious minds into!

A recent letter copy to Scientific American may help define the pending trauma of
knowing our `deceased' as full govern us for a folly-prone need for their own mtDNA
survival above entropy, when lacking fatty lipids from some incarnate. (75%! as just
found)

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; copy ScAm let (over)
CC: D/Z w: subXfile

6/26/2k
Blake Edgar, ed. et. al.
c/o California Wild
California Academy of Science

Re: more than skulls! (Thomas text)
Dear Sir: (from Lucy to left brain language dominance)

Once we begin to comprehend who to get mad at-- as even kept the mounting obvious
from the public's attention about the 2d aware as use UFOs, especially around grave
yards, all of our unseen ancestors will be understood as dangerous indeed when they need
the incarnate's fatty lipids, to escape their always pending entropic syndrome. The drive to
keep any ethnic clan together in space defines that grand ethnic war pending across this
planet, as that dogma promised free-for-all drive to win the planet.

A couple letter copies herewith may enlighten, especially if into the physics of space-time
`relative' reality.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; Bloomberg/let copy
CC: D/Z w: subXfile

8/31/2k

E Mail to: catherine brenner@utc.fr;kroemer@igr.fr

Re: mitochondria/death
Sirs: (mt-integrators; 18 August,SCIENCE)

Your adroit data says much when integrated with Scheffler's text
albeit yet leaves much unsaid as to `reasons' when Freud saw the enigma as our
sympathetic CNS called some "censor", even Thanatos when we consciously get too close
to comprehending same!'

Maybe the question now is that `zinc finger' or freed electrons guarding a couple ports via
the Krebs cycle?

Sincerely,

KTS Reseach
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)-- if not all scrubbed from public view! (check with sysop or
write for a direct down-load, no cookies-- please share if anything felt worth while!)

cc: Sheffler letter; 3-dev;Path/IQ
CC DZ w:

COPY:
                                        7/9/2k
Immo E. Scheffler, et. al.
Dept. of Genetics
University of California
San Diego, (La Jalla), CA 92093
                                 Re:mtDNA `mass'?
Dear Sir:                     (your fine `Mitochondria')

While yet `plowing through' what to an EE appears obviously a quality text to be envied,
my also obvious but abstruse inquiry-- based on a lengthy study into `psychology' based
on physics, some anomalous questions came to the fore, tersely indicated in a letter
written to Scientific American (over). In short, to realize the binaries of genetic import
may never define a mental contingency, yet that underlies the net behaviors of any
animal-- the human one facing some real problems which appear somewhat answerable
via the split-brain data*-- as said defined in physics.
   I hope to end my `wallowing' into your `definitudes' hopefully soon(!)-- but ask the
most bizarre question facing possibly our real dilemma of intellectual development,
especially associated with the human covert manipulation for survival or esteem as the
`win syndrome' now becoming most irrational in my humble opinion.
   The nitrogen predominance in genetic structure infers its need of historical `program'
(genes) thus accruing behavioral record as might constitute psychological evolution,
whether in the DNA as used for either the `physical' or mtDNA `psychological', thus
conceivably contingent to valance or charge-- seen as what the freer electron might offer.
Since the time reversal paradigm of W. Heisenberg (sorry!)-- as the ample empirical data
of the EPR experiments as a factor of `knowing potentials', is now noted as what `uses'
somehow our right cerebral hemisphere (CQ; creative insight). A can of worms becomes
apparent as to what indeed `is' the other deductive (sympathetic CNS `fight/flight) mental
attribute with time orientation so clearly noted using our left brain?
   Since one of my pre-med students said a repeat of McDougal's bizarre findings of mass
loss at physiological death**, one could ask next "what got up and left?"-- so the weird
next question of can that `mass' be defined as possibly mtDNA? I'm at a loss to suggest
any place to where it might `go', yet some of my students giggle and mention UFOs,
assuming mass does exist therewith! Your genius should find a way of repeating
McDougal's work but somehow catching to weigh whatever mass gets up to leave, via the
breath?
   There is data defining a kind of `anti-g' with superconductivity, thus conceivably
`propulsion' at reduced temperatures with twisted nucleons-- the top quark defining same
most vividly as obviously cannot have the `mass' claimed from a finite lepton! In short,
cross academic import is looming enough to beg some mighty curious questions-- thus in
part why I struggle with your erudite text, possibly to define some fool in rags! Sorry, if
this misses its mark-- or evokes the anxiety of which a few super minds did very quickly
commit suicide upon pondering.

Maybe Freud was right, to suggest why do our APA professionals lead in suicide today?
Because it appears obvious that our own left brain dominance is contingent with irrational
behavior-- one could wonder (if yet able) what did happen to our midbrain (RAS) or
conscious mind at this very late hour-- lacking much nuance of conscience? The now
noted female's often decoupled anterio-corpus callosum says much about an innate
`lobotomy'-- noting Gorman's Time cover story goof of 7/17/95! Did Lucy's mtDNA get
this whole mess started?

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)

(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
** Harvard U. circa 1910; published in New England J./Med.

KTS efforts:
Cancer nodule elimination:
Defined in Europe ('69) the definitive biological stunting versus growth factors associated
with electrical polarity, much noted by Prof. H.S. Burr (Yale; circa late 40's), the simple
micro-electrode use to stunt if not kill cancer nodules. Agreement by other bio-research
associates suggested further research, and priority documentation (as U.S. Patent
registered upon return), to find to my chagrin "no interest". Its cover story in DISCOVER
magazine (April '86; 16 years later) defined why! Yet, after lecturing several medical
groups find no use yet for the simple, economical and very therapeutic means. Collusion
for profit margins appears the problem-- beyond the vast suffering of the public even yet!

VDT (Visual Display Terminal) stress remedy:
From Prof. Haber's work (Columbia) and Navy Helmholtz coil research on cerebral EEG
stress, fusion-flicker anomalies defined not only the time-share EEG half cycle use but
subjective (psychological) stress due to inadequate reductive half cycle time to process
some definitive thought. From my R&D on both cross cerebral polarity anomalies and
relative input versus output mental functions, again directly associated with cerebral
polarities, found a simple remedy to block VDT user stress with anti-slaved CR strobing.
While in very great need by the flying public where their air-traffic controllers do not
need headache problems to interfere with the reductive mental process of stacking
air-borne aircraft. The entire field of computer VDT use could benefit greatly as well, yet
it appears that the military's heads-up program takes precedence over the public's comfort
and safety.

The 5th Generation Computer:

Noting from physics the freed electron escaped the time reversal paradigm, not only was
the EPR experiment (see a qualified physicist to explain), such like interface might offer
the ultimate computer to man. Indeed it was as ensuing R&D offered a prototype which
offered over odds of 10\50th to one on its maiden run. This system's Patent filing got blocked, so
tapped telephones with FBI surveillance said all that was needed. Actually, my GVSC
students were nervous over my early 70's research-- but more so about what they felt a
government quite unable to handle any so reality of unconscious ability. Freud was
correct, unbearably so-- in retrospect of the prototype device's run over twenty years ago.
This device, noting the M.I.T. meeting on various anomalies associated with less than
benign UFO encounters-- may as well remain secret. In short, far more is being said by
what is adroitly being left unsaid today-- to this kept very naive public now.

(KTS Research)

6/23/2k
Editor(s), et. al.
Scientific American
415 Madison Ave.,
New York, NY 10017-1111
Re: proteomics sans mitochondrion?
Dear Sirs: (July 2k issue)

Since it is mind over matter, the mtDNA should be understood more than the DNA,
which is merely what Darwin looked for when a physiological body needed to change to
accommodate the weather! Maybe the `proto'zoon should be examined in view of relative
evolutional time, as its need for some prokarotic to eukaryotic DNA `body' design in
which to house itself against the `elements' of other hungry critters like itself in another
walled cell. While a fine exercise counting genes in the DNA, that is not "where its at"
since mitochondrion governs with a mind so uses that body's DNA `mechanics' (patterns)
to build or modify the physical if no AiR (Autoimmune Response) for mutation or a
death-wish is promoted. A conditioned dumb conscious mind is to be favored whatever is
now claimed, but to block any right brain insight as may help define subjective reality--
however fear evoking, even suicide in the higher intellectual as our esteemed APA
professionals!

Darwin may have gone as far in his time as possible to suggest DNA physiological
control, even mentioning the psychic underlying design to any nature of some animal. To
replicate his most important finding in the genome project does not yet touch on the most
important of Nature's goal of mental evolution in a finite structure as mitochondrion,
however neurotic today at humanity's late stage of mental evolution.

Because the freed electron evokes some `happening' in our slow relative time (note EPR
data!), it likely first created the gene, but then assembles them at conception to be sure the
future physical `specimen' fits the needed `structure' to house some irascible `soul'-- or
mitochondrion, noting its ever greater size for evolution in IQ-- since at least back in the
days of Lucy! That follow-up study of equating what McDougal found at Harvard (circa
1910) with weight loss at death, haunts us as we examine Martian data as ancient
Egyptian claim of astral travel using anti-g with a twisted (temperature/superconductivity)
third quark leg on some hadron. Without much gluten left on Mars, their inhabitants may
have migrated here, with no more than mtDNA to feed on the naive on planet earth-- very
secretly-- as all UFO travel is kept now.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

cc: Phys/Psy; S-T
CC: Preston; Mayr; D/Z w:

9/10/2K
P.H. Chandrasekar, et. al,
Waune State School of Medicine
Detroit, Michigan 48202
Re: Zinc finger?

Dear Sir:

With the freed electrons from various metaloids to stimulate the `guidance'
parasymapetheic CNS T-4 cells, in may be that anticipative faculty's ability to thwart
early a pending disease.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)-- if not all scrubbed from public view!

                                             8/31/2k
                         Re: report: 18 August SCIENCE
Sirs:                    (body weight loss via cleavage?)

Do mononuclear cells noted in synovia reflect a hybred or yet a more ancient derivation
via mtDNA as cleaving for some alternate chemoattraction thus allow a certain
percentage of synovia fluid degredation as likely loss (dissappearance)-- as the now seen
odd 75% found in net energy loss in the human animal?

An ancient mononuclear cell or its progenitor mitochondrion may, as some other mutative
function drive a parasitic system to feed, on synovia (albumen) as little empirical
evidence prevails to so define its net existence yet. The question of weight loss
differences between subjects may show the arthritic suffers more such enigma, possibly
with the wrong or mutated antibodies somehow. As some diet factors show less arthritic
(synovia) stress possibly another avenue remains open for correlative study.

Any net antagonism (CC receptors) as T4 lymphocytic rejections in AIDs implies a
learned or mutation factor. Suspicion of mtDNA now could be rampant after perusing
Scheffler's fine text-- even for we Electrical engineers interested in the underlying
pathology of our left cerebral (right ponsusing primitive) sympathetic CNS!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)-- if not all scrubbed from public view yet!

8/26/2k
`News' Dept.
WMTE Radio
52 Greenbush St.,
Manistee, MI 49660
Re: Time publisher's conspiracies
Dear Sirs:

Nothing, absolutely nothing will ever match the conspiratorial booboo of CHristine
Gorman (editor at Time) when she made up a cover story on gender brain difference-- for
thr whole world to ponder! She failed to note the facts on the front cover of Nature
magazine which so `did it to herself'! A very subtle comment in Science `letters' after I
sent a copy (over) to AAAS saying "We are bending over backwards to correct our
errors"(indeed!) To bad Time won't be sued over that one-- but will likely go out of
business when the men of this country wake up to what drives the woman from their
hidden mtDNA!(as left brain for their constant need of`intrigue'-- so the Soaps for the
most cunning perversion on the Amercian `boob-tube'!

Sincerely,
Anonymous.(49626-0271)

(No further `com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)--if anything is left from the now very alarmed Federal hackers

Your Liddy shows show clearly IQ and the fearless, please don't turn him off-- for the few
who yet think up here in the woods!

cc: Gore-let(over); Path/IQ;S-T
CC DZ w:

                                   7/22/2k
Murry Scotman(?), et. al.,
Dept. of Psychology
San Francisco U.,
San Francisco, CA 94122
                              Re: chance and cerebral use
Dear Dr. Scotman:             (NPR `investment' radio program)

Since relative time defines the gambling syndrome in any animal, most weird now is the
human one whose relative lateral cerebral dominance define the space vs. time
orientations of our CNS. The difference however with IQ is to avoid insight thus follow
the herd as elegant promisers who must survive with chance. Hindsight has nothing to
offer when foresight can predict, especially with over 10/50th odds as noted on the first
Self-thinking computer!* (if curious, note the positive results of the EPR experiments)

Most pronounced now is the decoupled forebrain, especially in the female gender where
her mtDNA governs thought*. An recent adroit text defines much of the enigma so we
expect soon some big trauma in this kept well programmed dumb society. Hubris is
justified!

Once the physics gets fully understood as split-brain data**, the grand awakening will be
traumatic, especially in view of those in authority whose well armed troops will do the
most damage-- even if the needed purging of our neurotic left brain dominants. Not
oddly, Freud was correct but who now would understand him?

Sorry if this evokes more anxiety than interest, but I chance you are a Psychologist-- not
suicide prone APA professional!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)

* `Mitochondria' by Scheffler (over/ Gor-let copy)
** `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 -- and;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; 3-dev
CC: D/Z w:

COPY:
7/18/95
Editors
Time Publishers, Inc.
Time Life Bldg.
Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10020-1393
Re: Bent thinking-- p.51; 7/17 issue)
Sirs:

What a travesty! Your Gorman is attempting to gore men and I am betting she herself
doesn't perceive it any more than the twisted text with scans shown-- as likely twisted
face lacking any left facial smile! This folly can be expected now, especially with naive
editors as publishers in love with the academic programmed corrupt promulgating half
truths for an even more stupid public. Little wonder our pending but needed ethnic
cleansing looms so close-- to put to shame the one now in Yugoslavia!

Mere examination of what you pro-offered of which brain have has the full corpus
callosum (obviously left image) as independent lateral excitation (right) defines the
reversed (laterally!) as worded text implied. You people must also own Ph.Ds!

Until, but won't happen now, science perceives what Sperry* uncovered between spatial
and temporal complementals in mass-time between those two lateral cerebral
hemispheres, we the conscious mind (RAS) is doomed to annihilation, just as Prof.
Renoux sees** with AiR (Autoimmune Response) of the left brain half to conclude any
further mental evolution on the human specie. It is sad that the scriptural dogmas are
more correct than science yet the empirical obvious is the only means to extricate the
believers from their twisted dogma!

As my prediction over twenty years ago (after I defined physics as the precursor to
space-time mental faculty) that vowels versus nouns would define lateral cerebral
dichotomies-- I also said the intellectual (reductive left brain) would never tolerate this
obvious-- especially by instated authority, as I quickly also found. (over) These are heady
days indeed, especially for those so few who do think!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
**Renoux; U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs.
57-58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)

cc: Path/IQ; Phys-Psy; 3-dev(over)
CC: D/Z w:

9/2/2k
Rachel Herz, et. al.
Dept. of Psychology
Bron University
Providence, RI 02912

Re: `Scents of Time'(The Sciences)
Dr. Herz:
Your work is intriguing in view of the complemental orientations between our lateral
cerebral hemispheres. Especially the relative prevarications as contingent to kept hidden
factors that could define unconscious motives!* In keeping with this never said idea,
Gorman's TIME front-page article some years ago** indicates this enigma. Freud said it
clearly; "The unconscious wills to remain UNconscious!" or turns into Thanatos!-- so
care!-- when snooping too deeply! Allow his `Royal Road' to inform first. Thus whether
Proust or the Australian aboriginal's dream time, reality is the primary factor offered,
oddly the context contingent with past real experience in the 2D visual sense, NOT
however necessarily repeated verbally for others to hear! Likely the closer to a prokaryote
or amoeba an odor keys (feeding interests) to so excite the basic mtDNA for its own Kreb
cycle use where fatty lipid signals the drive for survival.

Since being officially informed that my research opinions were somehow classified secret
shortly after Sperry's* confirmations to my predicted space/time bilateral cerebral
hemispheres, predictions. Most of all ensuing KTS research has gone underground,
especially the physics as especially as contingent to accurate predictions then seen in
astronomy as other empirical investigative areas. Since what Freud noted with a long
UCLA grant (BIS) study made clear an awesome psychological problem facing late
intellectual man-- likely most needs not be defined today has hazards defined by abupt
suicides (note APA's rate!) The difference between reciting what is consciously
subjectively visually seen versus verbally conjured defins the grand liability of recovered
reality, often unrecognized consciously!

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)-- if not all scrubbed from public view! (check with sysop for
direct Net download-- no cookies-- please share if anything felt worth while!)

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67 as note;
`The Split Brain Revisited', July 98, SC.AM. (prevaricating left)
**cc:Gor-let of 7/18/95 : Phys/Psy; Path IQ;sysop quark comment;
CC: D/z w:

9/10/2k
J. F. Leckman, et. al,
Dept. of Psychiatry,
Yale University,
School of Medicine
New Haven, CT. 06520

Re: PANDAS "tics-- in time"p.151 Sept.2,2K SC News)
Sir:

The underlying question might be; what DNA fragment of some past prokayote is
intervening with the mitochondrion for the psychological behavior to evoke the needed
glitches? (to buy time) From the epileptic to overt intellectual neurosis, the right pons
primitive brain (via the left cerebral hemisphere) with mtDNA drive had likely always
been mankind's nemesis especially in view of Scheffler's fine text defining mutational
needs to `govern' a curious conscious mind-- where Thanatos is the last straw! (Freud)
My few abrupt suicides said far more than could or should be said now-- noting APA's
lead in such act!

To wonder at Rife's data, might the `resonant' cancellation of some purposeful folly be
done, almost surreptitiously today-- to somehow re-twist a bent mtDNA?

Sincerely,

KTS Research
49626-0271 USA (No further `.com' lines here. Sorry!)
(note: http://kts.org.gq.nu)-- if not all scrubbed from public view! (check with sysop for
direct Net downloads-- no cookies-- please share if anything is felt worth while!)
cc: Path/IQ; Phys/Psy; SC-AM letter copy
CC: D/Z w: Bilier; Swedo.

ed, especially for those so few who do think!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
**Renoux; U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER, Feb.'87; pgs