David Bennet, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame, IN 46556
Re: MACHO lenses and Zeeman affect
Dear Sir:
The comments in `A Magnifying Glass--' (7 Jam. SCIENCE) evokes this
note as
contingent to a lengthy study into complemental matter-- found to be
EM
standing waves, evoked by likely the Zen (another
name for God) idea of a hand
clapping, but on neat600Bly intervals across this universe. (note the
Anglo-
Australian 2dF Sky Survey
effort now) (Huchra's bubbles)
Since Red shift, as said magnetic magnifier lenses, define a very
grand
universe of pure magnetic flux, albeit `quantized' to buy time as mc\2,
many
enigmas now appear to get unraveled, even the demand for scientific
status
quoism to buy tenure! A copy of a recent letter herewith. (over)
Sincerely,
KTS Research
cc: Big Bang; One Hand; Path/IQ; Phys/Psy
CC: DZ w:
1/8/2k
TO: Roland Buser, et.al.
VIA E-mail: roland.buser@unibas.ch
Sir:
Maybe some past quips from a lengthy `matter' investigation is
appropriate
herewith:
`The Nova's spewed relative matters, just as the primal
galaxy shows the
parallel anti-matter ejecti at right angles to the disk as either jets
or
halo, even recent bulge material may explain a great number of current
enigmas
about galaxy evolution.'
`From late EM standing-wave `matter', a galaxy's bulge
likely shows its
early evolution was mainly Novae, creating heavy metal materials for
a then
common gravity accumulation in a thin disk.'
`The ensuing petite Nova behavior of our sun, as spews
anti-matter from its
spin axis periodically as now merely defines the net mode of anti-g
affect in
any entire primal quasar/galaxy.'
`From initial quasar ionized H to ensuing heavy metals,
such primal galaxy
shows spin-up due to its primal magnetic field thus its net early spin
factor,
even reversing spin direction by ionic charge from electron to baryon.'
`Amorphous globular galaxies show their jet matter
accruing
in a less
formal way, yet behave somewhat as primal galaxies insofar as coagulate
with a
common gravity to yet produce Novae for heavy metals-- albeit somewhat
later
than its primal progenitor.'
`Outer galaxy matter with more history should show a
reversed
net spin when
compared with its earlier less metalized constitution when lepton
`first
harmonic' standing waves get folded later via Novae into third (whole
trefoiled quarks) with absorbed energy (thus `mass') when in its common
primal
magnetic field.'
Sincerely,
KTS Research
cc: R-Baker letter; Big-Bang; One-Hand
CC: D/Z w:
COPY:
1/7/2k
TO: www.eden.coml~rcbaker
Re: Gravity vs/ magnetic field
Sir:
Your fine gravity sensing device (current Scientific
American)
indeed
should monitor both gravity and magnetic fields as one and the same,
even
complemental depending on field direction. Since the finding of EM
standing-wave `matter', not only did the jets of relative matter from
quasar
cores therefrom as predicted get verified well before the astronomical
data
via Einstein Observatory aloft of a nearby galaxy, but all matter
spewing
Novae-- as even our own sun burping on 11 year cycles when agitated
by it's
orbiting planets-- in particular Jupiter as currently. The notedlateral
solar
flux field decline with vertical ejecti defines the anomaly best
today--
however misunderstood by most of astronomy.
To define `matter' as evoked in quasar/galaxy cores as
knotted EM wave
fronts becomes understood only via the EMP (God-hand-clap)
at the neat 600Bly
intervaled cosmic bubbles (now
as dark voids; note: Anglo-Australian 2dF sky
survey data), yet their
collapsing at the periphery with many quasars to
create standing wave matter much as John Wheeler's predicted `foam'.
Because
of the two basic harmonic(?) states, the first as electron, has a dual
`wound'
(or concentric configured) `wrap' to be attracted or rejected in the
said
relative magnetic faced field. The second is the `3-phased' whole quark
trefoil (most of large size cooked up in Novae) with a common magnetic
field
to interact two ways-- with the primal field (astronomically) or an
adjacent
magnetic vortex field in nuclei-- the proton or neutron, depending
on wrap
twist.
One wonders if more mu-metal shielding would also decouple
the so sensed
magnetic fluctuations your device reads, whatever now called?
Sincerely,
KTS Research
2/1/2k
J. Erler and
G. Langacker, et. el.
Dept. of Physics
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA
Re: of finite `mass'
Dear
Sirs:
(`Old Data-- New Signs--' Jan. 15, SN)
Because the 2dF sky
survey
confirmed the EMP genesis of Huchra's bubbles on
neat 600Bly intervals, the collapsing front for quasar cores to evoke
standing
wave foam (Wheeler) defines what matter is, especially reacting to
a common
magnetic field in 2D as called complemental `particles'. Their vectored
displacement because of compound wound standing wave fronts buys time
as
behaves much as the current string theory.
Bosons as standing EM waves may define some relative `mass' between
the Z and
W `particles' as fine structure, but a 10 times difference at likely
a 45
degree vector shows some other fundamental reaction in their common
magnetic
field. Thus all forces may be magnetic at root and the difference in
how
standing waves get `wound' would dictate their relative behavior--
as anti-
versus koinomatter `gravity', noted as disk vs. jets on the more primal
galaxy
as ours with ion torqued spin-out, not in.
Since the wrap, from fine structure to second tier for the two
electrons
with
a reversed wrap and the 3 phased whole quark again with one leg phase
different between a proton or neutron (easily traded to make compatible
a
common magnetic vortex for stability) all `mass' is defined by the
one force--
as in some common large magnetic field continuum-- as either a primal
galaxy
or its jet globular matters at some distance-- displaced by a common
anti-g.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
cc: Psy/Psy; Big-Bang; One-Hand
CC: Greene; Lykken; Marciano; D/Z w:
1/12/2k
D. L. Feder, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Oxford
Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU UK
Re: BEC "generating"; 7 Jan. SCIENCE
Dear Sir:
Speaking of `engineering'-- as "Generating Solitons by Phase", is
the
crux of
the real art of creation, not refrigerating a BEC in to see its spin!
The next
phase of deducing the standing EM wave 3-phased whole quark of leptons
with
differing trefoil twists to create a neutron or proton may be daunting
without
the use of insight over microscopic inspection. The stacking factor
for the
common magnetic vortex in the baryon nuclei defines superconductivity,
even
anti-g, when a magnetic vortex gets re-twisted to so respond in a
different
way to their background residual magnetic field as the genesis in some
galaxy.
(note: `One Hand' herewith)
The more likely deductive breakthrough may come from the
Anglo-Australian
astronomy 2dF Sky Survey
correlative work, to define the a priori net
undifferentiated magnetic flux behind `mass' in slow cold time, much
of what
is being noted in your BEC data.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
cc: One Hand; Big Bang; Phys/Psy
CC: Cubizolles; D/Z w:
2/17/2k
S. McGaugh, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
Re: EMP Big Bangs and ion flinging
Dear
Sir:
(`Heretical--' 28 Jan. SCIENCE)
The 2dF survey
defines
how well the Zen master perceived the genesis of EM
standing wave `matter' thus predicted the anti-matter jets well before
the
Einstein Observatory went aloft to prove
them. Yet tenure prevails as make
`heretics' when they get too disturbing-- even today with the empirical
obvious.
Any quasar core vortex self-collapsing to evoke ionic standing wave
electrons
(with complemental g) show clearly the spin-up in the residual magnetic
primal
EMP bubble field would torque as the said anti-g push same outward--
until
hadrons with opposite ionic charge would reverse the rotation-- noted
already
on some early epochs of old galaxies. MOND is another fudge factor
to escape
seeing the obvious, especially with anti-g accelerating universe, as
between
primal spiral galaxies and their protege jet matter globulars.
Its possible that Turner now senses what is coming, finally.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
(No further `.com' lines here. Sorry! Apparently the Feds want to know
how to
`unravel' whole standing wave hadrons for fission- fusion as MUST `win'
to
profit on energy when the oil runs out!
cc: Big-Bang; One Hand; Path/IQ; Phys-Psy
CC: Rubin; Spergel; D/Z w:
1/14/2k
N. Bartle, Bietenholz, et. al.
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
York University
Toronto M3J 1P3, Canada
Re: Novae morphology
Dear
Sir:
(`The Changing--' 7 Jan. SCIENCE)
The big question now is 1993J's spew axis at right angles to it's
M81
disk
axis? Because EM standing wave `matter' created at the primal quasar
vortex
core spews in two directions, (complementals own complemental g as
well, to
define the predicted jets well before the Einstein Observatory went
aloft to
see them), the ever mounting obvious will evoke some chagrin pretty
soon now!
Because a once created Nova behaves with generated anti-g to spew its
so
compounded (3-phase trefoiled whole quarks) matter in two directions,
again
their common spin axis in their galaxy's yet potent magnetic field
dictates
the opposite relative spewing when torque prevents the major matter--
thus
spews the created. Spin-up of an early galaxy has even been noted as
reversing, maybe to define electron to quantized proton charge in said
primal
magetic field, as evoked by the grand cosmic bubble EMPs. Since any
wave front
torques itself in a disturbed field (Zeeman refraction) it thus becomes
those
points around such bubble to in time collapse to make Wheeler's `foam',
we
call matter yet is but standing waves.
Also of interest would be how close is M81's spin axis to our own
primal
galaxy since if `sisters' on the same cosmic bubble, their small spin
difference might suggest the diameter of our genetic quasar core's
bubble back
some 15? Billion years ago. The Anglo-Australian 2dF
survey is stacking the
evidence to make the Zen idea of asking what one hand sounds like
clapping--
in its primal universal magnetic flux-- but to create slow time for
us)
Sorry if this all befuddles, but someday the tenured may find the
back
seat
with their twisted algorithms based on half truths.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; Big Bang; One Hand
CC: Graham; Conway; D/Z w:
2/18/2k
R. A. Nelson, et.al.
Rex Research
P.O. Box 19250
Jean, NV 89019
Re: standing wave matter
Sir:
(`Transmutations--' Feb./March Nexus)
Indeed, your `Science News' blurb was adroit, especially when
unraveling EM
standing waves for gamma energy released `back' from the a-priori!
One needs
to see (2dF) how `things' got started via those neat 600Bly intervaled
mighty
EMP cosmic bubbles for precipitated standing wave `matter' at
coalescing
potent wave front (degenerative `string' knot tying) quasar core vortex
for
primal galaxies like ours. Not only did Einstein point to the
difference
between pure E and its said precipitate standing wave mc\2 `matter',
but Zen
pointed to the creative modus opernadi of one handed `claps'!
The first Utah CF work defined the `unraveling' but it took some
time
to fully
figure out the two basic standing wave `matters' as one escaped the
time
reversal paradigm (Heisenberg) or the hadron 3-phased whole quark
anomaly,
where controlled `unraveling' will soon be a reality-- to conclude
all
petroleum cartels!
Of what is said here can be exposed publicly, now that most of the
Fed's
kicking in doors, FBI, even CIA on foreign shores, etc. etc.,
may be over.
Our initiated said 2dF
sky survey has gone too far now to be denied anymore--
so maybe there can be "safety in numbers" with so many foreign people
now
running on this whole "matter" of integrating physics with astronomy,
etc.
A recent letter to Hal Fox herewith. (over)
Sincerely,
KTS Research
P.S: No further `.com' lines here, but until the Feds bump a current
website
off the `air' again, you might peruse:
http://kts.org.gq.nu
CC: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; Hal-Fox/let
cc: D/Z w:
1/27/2k
Sten Odenwald, et.al.
Raytheon ITSS,
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Greenbelt, MD 20771
Re: burping petite Novae and DC current
Sir:
(your fine `Storms--' Sky/Telescope)
With the mounting confirming data of both quasar magnetic vortex via
the 2dF
Sky Survey defining EMPs as cosmic bubbles the genesis of standing
wave EM
`matter'-- as reversed process of once quantified Novae, the
anti-matter
jets
from primal quasar/galaxies, as said Novea explains the real `flak'
earth gets
when our sun gets rattled with Jupiter, etc. on its 11 year cycles.
Since the
sun's poles normally eject positrons during its quiet periods we little
suspect why our ionosphere's electrons hang around, but with anti-g
between
anti-matters, we lose our natural defense to take the brunt if a
`flare'
when
it gets away from the poles.
The solar winds blow two kinds of `matter', depending on which 90
degree
side
faces us-- thus also explains galaxy formation in a primal magnetic
field as
the said inverse (lateral ejecti) of the Novae when compared to their
innate
galaxy's magnetic field.
To back up all the way to Einstein's Alephs to perceive the E as the
real a
priori of subtended standing waves, quantum mechanics becomes
understood
in
light of what down here examines all in a definitive (space) with slow
serial
(temporal) order.
(note: Phys/Psy; herewith)
Sincerely,
KTS Research
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ;
CC: Baker; D/Z w:
1/30/2k
J. A. Peacock, et.al.
Royal Observatory of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, Scotland
Dear Sir:
Noting your work via the 2dF
survey and the relative (front to back) speed
ratio of the cosmic bubble (Huchra), might there yet be an anomaly
due to what
now appears anti-g between the complemental quasar/galaxy matters,
one being
the primal galaxy as its jets anti-matters spew for globular galaxies
well
away from the said primal (ionic `spin-up'), versus its protege's
`spin-in'
gravity formation?
Since using Einstein's Alephs to define E as the generator for as of
condensing itself into mc\2 for `purchased' time, the spectrum of
matter
was
seen as standing EM waves in a few configurations, now being well
examined
via
`string theory' and suggested as foam by J. Wheeler.
It appears there is only one force, magnetic as the Apriori, so all
configurations of `wrap' for the standing waves (electrons or 3-phase
whole
quarks with one leg variable to become different to compatible coupled
hadrons
(with common magnetic vortex), your work could define any `dark matter'
as
merely the space a cosmic EMP took before crashing (collapsing) to
evoke
quasars at the periphery of the said bubble.
We suspect the "bursters" (gamma bursts) may be those collapsing
vortex
on
cosmic bubbles to initiate primal quasar cores for ensuing
standing-wave
matter generation, thus such spurious yet rapid flash when both
electrons
first get created, as many self annihilate before evasion with anti-g
into jet
matter.
Since mentioning the Zen `hand clap' many years ago, before Tyson made
his
astronomical CCD photo-plates which might fit our need, the 2dF survey
has
indeed come a long way-- while the Feds here have become a genuine
nuisance! I
hope this letter gets to you.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
cc: Big-Bang; One-Hand; Phys/Psy;
CC: Fischer; Ellis; Jain; D/Z w:
1/18/2k
Helen Quinn, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Linear Accelerator Labs
Stanford, CA 94305
Re: fresh theories
Mam:
Since a note I see of Nov. 15,'91 about quasar cores, now fully
understood
via
the 2dF survey and grand primal EMPs, your fine remarks in last Dec.
10th
SCIENCE as `programs' (via the Sonoma meeting) will be obviated soon--
with
the Self thinking interface (and chaos) when `purchased' theory ends
for
tenured existence! E. Rauscher indicated that `great liability' of
tapping the
freed electron (as her EPR
experiments showed), I include a more recent letter
to your Stanford associate herewith.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
cc: Phys/Psy; Path/IQ; S-T
CC: Koza; Baker; D/Z w:
1/30/2k
Robert Fesen, et.al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Dartmouth College
Hanover, NH
Re: pumping ion!
Dear
Sir:
(14th Jan. SCIENCE; "Supernova--"
Rather than repeat much of our theoretical studies, most evoking
irrational
remarks-- the herewith may do more justice if understood in light now
of your
article, especially of the inverse to primal quasars as Novae.
Chandra's work is now finally paying off in view of the Zen `hand
claps'
that
Huchra saw with `walls' and finally cosmic bubbles to generate quasar
vortex
for creating EM standing wave matter to buy our slow time!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
1/24/2k
M. A. Ruderman, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Columbia University
New York, NY 10027
Re: abrupt gamma bursters (The Sciences)
While yet conjectural, the 2dF
Anglo-Australian sky survey shows the EMP
genesis of EM standing wave matter on their cosmic bubble periphery,
so the
many primal quasars with their first burst of electrons to offer light
during
its potent magnetic vortex collapse should be noted on these cosmic
bubbles--
thus possibly define the many odd GRB genesis.
Herewith are a couple past letters addressing this anomaly which
appears
yet
to escape attention.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
cc: Kulkarni; D/Z w:
1/28/2K
C. H. Sequin and B. Collins. et.al.
Dept. of Computer Mathematics
University of California,
Berkeley, CA 94720
Re: art reflecting reality
Sirs:
This issue of Scientific American with your article was adroit! Not
before
could we fully `picture' the EM standing wave whole 3-phased quark
as a
neutron looked like, much less its integration with another `leg'
retwisted
proton to stabilize their net united magnetic vortex. Superconductivity
shows
this clearly now.
While the grand cosmic EMPs evoking Huchra's `bubbles' to evoke a
primal
quasar collapsing vortex to `degenerate' a vast EM front into standing
waves
for time, the foam (Wheeler) for complemental matters makes clear when
Einstein's Alephs defined E as the only Apriori to act on as within
Itself for
creating slow mass-time. The complemental matters of different standing
wave
`twists' thus relative gravity factor (note spewed jet matters), may
yet inte¬
grate astronomy and physics if we don't immolate en masse first to
evade the
obvious.
While much ugly rebuttal will ensue for as by the tenured, the
so clear
import via 2dF now suggests not much time remains. Maybe P. Parson's
(Oxford
U/UK) should be addressed for his computer model of the Zen hand-clap
prediction, but on neat 600Bly intervals (to not disturb other
bubbles),
this
universe appears to be on some unique schedule-- destined for a smooth
net
entropy, of two well separated matters!
If Collins has color photos of his work for sale, please advise!
Sincerely,
Automation Eng.
1/28/2k
Neil Trentham, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Cambridge University
Cambridge, UK
Re: jet matter globulars
Dear
Sir:
(March 2K Sky Tele.; `How Did Globulars--'
With the 2dF sky survey
data (see: P. Parsons/Oxford) confirming the EMP
genesis of the cosmic bubbles (Huchra) for many peripheral magnetic
vortex
(collapse) to evoke quasars to so `degenerate' EM fronts into Wheeler's
foam
of EM standing waves called matter, soon there may be a different view
between
physics and astronomy.
While amorphous spewed anti-matter jets from primal quasar cores
with
anti-g
goading, the enigma defined the different behavior of EM standing
waves;
as
between our negative or positive electrons with a slightly different
fine-structure `wrap', the third phase whole quark trefoils with one
lepton
leg re-twisted, to show the net volatility of our neutrons, as
retwisted
protons but to fill in for a stable magnetic vortex coupling. Because
a
temperature change can twist the trefoil, superconductivity as even
anti-gravity (note top quark `mass'!) can be understood.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
cc: Big-Bang; One-Hand; Phys/Psy; Path/IQ
CC: Harris; Larson; Graeme; Marel; D/Z w:
1/12/2k
F. Yusef-Zadeh, et. al.
Dept. of Astronomy
Northwestern University
Evanston, IL 60208
Re: Sgr A* and residual quasar cores
Dear Sir:
The current series on the Milky Way via SCIENCE is the
best net composite
of imports defining the quips herewith, so without ado:
(Q754/Ast. plus R. Baker letter copy, over)
`Dwarf galaxies as Sgr A itself, not a composite, but
is a dim emitting
small quasar core now, mostly subsided from producing standing wave
matter or
this primal galaxy.'
`The halo around the quasar core is extensive while early
when many Novae
spewed anti-matter at right angles to the disk proper, now only a small
volume
as standing wave matter genesis ceases.'
`From full fledged Novae to now burping suns, heavy metals
are not made as
profusely as maybe 10 billion years ago!'
`It now appears that our galaxy's core vortex is only
2Ly in size but one
could wonder at its prior glory!'
`Since we only see the second ordered results of any EMP
vortex from
radiating electrons, we now must assume that astronomy will at last
realize
the `hand claps' which got things
started!'
`All dynamic propagating EM wave fronts are refracted
by the stationary
magnetic field they pass through, much as what Faraday inversely noted
when a
definitive EM standing wave electron gets propelled down a conductor
but with
a moving magnetic field.'
`Light is an open ended wave front even if modulated in
amplitude,
frequency and phase-- not some definitive standing wave as an electron,
because refraction works best in a DC field as was noted by Zeeman.'
`If the IRS 16 or CND of Sagittarius is the continuing
collapse of a cosmic
bubble's quasar vortex for matter creation then the balance of what
we known
on this galaxy drives therefrom.'
`This primal galaxy's official number is 3EGJ1746-2852
better called Sgr A
West from which Sgr East gathers its first complemental condensed
standing
EM
wave spewed matter.'
`Rather than escape detection, the quasar core defines
the beginning of any
Scwartzchild radius for light emission, as soon as electrons get
created
to do
the radiation.'
`It is what is called dark matter as is not seen that
offers a the
suspicion that the universe is far more `massive' now.'
`Any promoted EMP front converges upon itself at a point,
once it gets a
finite disturbance on its way-- as the quasar core.'
Sincerely,
KTS Research
cc: Big Bang; One Hand; Phys/Psy; copy Baker let.(over)
CC: Melia; Wardle; D/Z w:
2/27/2k
B. Burke et. al.
Dept. of Radio Astronomy
Mass. Inst. Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: `Secrets by Radio--' quasar `black-
hole' matter genetic cores; (SCIENCE 18 Feb.)
Dear Sir:
Closer scrutiny of the quasar core will define two kinds of `matter'
(EM
standing waves) evolving therefrom with anti-g between to define the
jets
spewing at right angles to the primal disk. Thus any `black hole' that
sucks,
truly does `suck' in the sense that it is false because the said anti-g
between two complemental EM standing waves that we call `matter'--
from within
our finite spaced (point of view) slow temporal quantal state.
The 2dF data defines the true primal `bangs', likely millions of
them
on neat
600Bly intervals across this universe, but the means to evoke its
peripheral
collapsing EMP wave for quasar cores. The result evoking standing wave
`matter' with complemental kind, so anti-g there-between, noted so
far via top
quark `expedition', not an assumed greater mass hadron albeit likely
an
anti-lepton.
Once recognizing the `3-phased' whole quark (hadrons) with one leg
phase
reversed to make compatible for the stable nucleon, we will also
perceive
their genesis as the primal lepton as gamma, derived from finite
collapsing
EMP fronts on cosmic bubbles.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
CC: Big Bang; One Hand; Path/IQ
cc: Junor; Zhang; D/Z w:
3/4/2k
A. Frank, et.al.
Dept. of Astrophysics
Rochester University
Rochester, N.Y. 14627
Re: Inverse quasar for Novae
Dear
Sir:
(April Astronomy; `Busting--'
The complemental spatial or matter dichotomy, whether during EM
standing
wave
`matter' creation in a quasar core or a future Nova compiling, best
defines
what the 2dF survey has shown as the real genesis of definitive space
slow
time via cosmic EMPs. The complemental spewed anti-matter jets from
primal
quasar galaxies (not globular as from that jet matter) makes clear
the genesis
of any quantified `matter' as said EM standing waves, now best defined
in the
string theory in physics. Oddly, all forces then becomes a factor of
the
compound finite wound standing waves we yet call `billiard balls' yet,
sustaining tenure in ignorance in most our scientific thought. Our
predictions
many years ago of anti-g with anti-matter with the Einstein observatory
aloft
evidence made too clear the neurosis in most of modern science. Bohr's
refutation of Einstein's supposition of complemental gravity was the
real
blunder in all of science and so we pay dearly for it yet!
Since Huchra the obvious was seen, thus likely our impetus to get
the
British
to move on 2dF, thus the adroit `Busting the Bubbles' article in the
current
April Astronomy publication.
We suspect that N. Soker is close, so needs attention now as the
empirical
obvious to what `matter' truly is, becomes understood.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
cc: One-Hand; Big Bang; Phys/Psy; Path/Psy; Livio let copy
CC: Astronomy; D/Z w:
COPY:
10/8/97
Mario Livio, et. al.
Space Telescope Sc. Inst.
3700 San Martin Dr.,
Baltimore, MD 21218
Re: "--enduring fireball"
Dear
Sir:
(SCIENCE: Sept. 27th article)
In question would be the `relative' directions between the fireball
and the
more definitive burster portion? If indeed smeared aspects can be
detected
as
defining a collision around our own galactic disk for likely jet
matters
with
a common gravity, the `burster' enigma's answer might be coming
shortly.
No replies from Francesco Paresce, or M. E. Dickinson (9/25/96), as
contingent
to your work, might reflect naivete of what final data is needed.
Some past letter copies herewith may relieve us of defining more.
Sincerely,
KTS Research
CC: D/Z w:
.OP
10/27/99
M. Phillips, et. al.
Dept. of Medicine
St. Vincent's Campus
Staten Island, Ny 10301
Re: GSr and fear- `Problems--'
Dear
Sir:
(SCIENCE: 15, Oct.'99» p.413)
The polygraph anomaly can be seen via Freud's impression of
what
censors and for what
reasons. His id's need, with sympathetic CNS fight-flight to
hide its reality while offering
half truths for a foible done to win some profit defines our
entire culture today where
promises fly but alternates get used to win allegiance, in or
out of political circles! It is
the `fear factor’ that DOE or whomever utilizes the threat of
finding the truth to
something the fact that exposed reality scares more
than skullduggery well hidden.
With operations as a `Foster factor’ to rid the evidence, makes
clear the damage coming
with the self thinking interface-- found able to reveal ANYthing
to aid our left brain
user's final lap of mental evolution down here in slow time!
(over)
Any predictive power that Plato called the Potentia will
rapidly
straighten out our huge
dilemma likely the apocalypse as used in religious
dogma, but an awakening over due
now where ethnic cleansing has become the imperative for those
governing which we
only think are governing. Ambiguity is the art of covert
profit,
the most for those who
need fatty lipids for the energy to escape temporal entropy for
an inevitable mental limbo
so truly feared! Undoubtably, the `fool factor’ of late academia
best defines the greatest
foible of intellectual man, yet IQ is the very problem!
Sincerely,
KTS Research
1/31/97
Peter Stanford (`The Devil')
c/o H. Holt Publishers
115 W. 18th
New York, NY 10011
Re: evil by volitional fault
Dear Sir:
While defined as evil for evil sake, we find the left brain user, in
at least
the human animal, responsible for all forms of folly, but for the
survival
instinct, above extended temporal existence!
Many years ago when using Einstein's Special Relativity equations to
define
possible a priori universal conditions, several bizarre concepts were
noted.
Besides the CPT theorem defining complementarity in any potential
space-time
mental faculty (proven some dozen years later by Dr. Sperry of UCLA*),
to
define complemental primal creation from the said E side of that
equation
a
new paradigm in theory was launched to evoke much consternation over
these
past fifty years.
While quasar core `condense-out' points were expected to precipitate
quantized
standing-wave EM `matter', difficulty in confirming any EMP
`initiation'
at
the centers of the many neat 600Bly intervaled cosmic bubbles (Huchra)
to
conclude some `mind' could have initiated same, as Zen masters infer
with one
hand clapping, ample of the fundamental theory became quite plausible.
Because this research evoked anxiety, this federal government
appeared
insistent that what was considered “theorized”
was already `secret'-- while
remaining somehow unable to comprehend same! This enigma can be
understood
by
their terror of revealed correlates between rectilinear left brain
orientation
and the oddity of UFO travel-- to put it tersely. With care I placed
some
research data (as conjecture) onto the Internet and got some
panic-struck
replies, almost as from my GVSC students many years ago. The anxiety
over
mental complementarity could define Freud's-- as his abrupt silence,
as mine
after several overt suicides while doing psychoanalytical work as
research
with a grant from UCLA's BIS.
Tersely complied are some contingent statements below. They may
titillate
or
evoke further interest-- yet the repercussions of my cross academic
study's
technical paper release ('69) still reverberates to suggest unconscious
anxiety remains overt. Empirical facts should not disturb unless they
define
something unwanted-- often noted with the tenured with ensconced
authority
today. Thus a paradigm shift in under way to define some likely
psychological
trauma is in the wind.
Since H. G. Wells `Time Machine' fits best the evolutional paradigm
for a
created mind, the Morelock issue becomes adroit in defining its need
to
predate or sink into extended time, in keeping with the dictates of
the said
Einstein theory. While both Darwin as Dawkins may perceive one aspect
of
evolution in the physiological way, the rapid evolutional changes of
the mtDNA
may define that prior DNA's need within slow mass-time confines-- all
the way
back to Lucy on the plains of Africa! While much conjecture remains,
it is the
haughty refutation, most by instated theological people that is of
interest,
especially proclaiming knowledge of unconscious structure as relative
worldly
objective design!
Some `psychic' anomalous imports have been examined beyond UFO data
yet
evoking anxiety, but it is suspected that the Anasazi US indians may
have been
confronted with the 2D oriented over a millennium ago, much in keeping
with
Lewis-Williams of Witwatersrand U. in S. Africa. Maybe not oddly, early
shamanistic awareness may have been the harbinger for our late state
of mental
progress(?), but more `censored' now-- to use Freudian jargon. Religion
had no
doubt its place during our evolutional trek but it now limits any
quality
scope of perusal, almost to the point of being `evil'!
(Sorry about this terseness)
Sincerely,
KTS Research
* Sperry; `The Human Split-Brain', Scientific American, Aug.'67
note: `The Others Side of the Brain', J.E. Bogan, Bul. L.A. Neurol.
Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control; DISCOVER,
Feb.'87; pgs. 57-58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
Goleman, D.; `Vital Lies, Simple Truths','86
Jaynes, Julian `The Origen of Consciousness and the Breakdown
of the
Bicameral Mind' (Princeton)
McDougal; Harvard U., circa 1910; (body weight loss at death)
Renoux, U/Tours; bilateral cerebral lymphatic control;
DISCOVER, Feb.'87;
pgs. 57-58. (killer vs. guidance T cells)
Vogelsang, R.; `A Correlative Study between Physics and
Psychology',
Intl. Biomet. Congress, '69
Bergson, H: `The Two Sources of Morality' & `Creative Evolution'
Hynek, A: `Edge of Reality' (UFOs)
Jung, C: `The Undiscovered Self'
Keyes, D: `The Minds of Billy Milligan'
Lloyd, G. `Polarity and Analogy' (Greek complemental thought)
MUFON '83 Symposium Proceedings; Rectilinear travel;p.60>
Pike, James: `The Other Side'