phy14_7-a.html

All Physic letters from 1991 up thru 4/1/2k:

Jan. 15,'91
Abhay Ashtekar and
Carlo Rovelli, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 12560
Re: knots and deBroglie
Sirs:

As noting in the Dec. 14 SCIENCE the remark that empty space is far from that
to make any loop-string theory viable in that Apriori magnetic field, we
return again to deBroglie where nothing is `finite' and wave theory becomes
supreme. Indeed, the implication for anti-g between the primal complemental
matters inferred high ejection rates at quasar poles to disk, so when indeed
seen with the aloft Einstein observatory, Big Bang began to crumble!

The greatest loop for any `string' theory may well be the bubbles of EMP that
permit the ease of quasar (to galaxy) formation-- for the creation of
stabilized complemental matter-- no Big Bang. Of course this cannot sit well
for tenured people so may require another century to sink in. The real
question thence becomes Who with volitional will and spatial wisdom (note our
right cerebral non-temporal brain!) `snapped their finger' to evoke those vast
EMPs so nicely placed throughout the universe for finite matter creation? We
are convinced you are on the correct `digital' approach to the grandest
analogical problem facing mankind. What truly remains "mysterious" in anyone's
jargon today is why we remain so neurotically stuck with some ancient theory
as Big Bang to only lead us astray-- but ah, there's tenure!

We are in the research field needed to comprehend what indeed Einstein
meant with his Spec. Rel. theory which denoted, with the edict from the CPT
theorem, complemental perspectives within space-time. Our ensuing prediction
of the spatial vs. temporal lateral cerebral faculty (long before Sperry's
split-brain subjects proved same) pointed to the likely reality. Then, only
the positive EPR experiments remained to be confirmed to finalize our
Patent filing. Hope you can follow the herewith.

Keep up the fine work--
Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:Phys-Psy; Path/IQ; S-T

CC: T. Jacobson; C. Isham

Dec.14,'90
H. Hayden and P. Beckmann, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06268
Re: still `tilting' eh?
Dear Sirs: (Nov. 30, SCIENCE, p.250)

From the apparent `tired light'* (plus self phase alignment) over astronomical
distances, maybe it would be more prudent to do your Beckmann experiment in a
different `ether' as a magnetic field, being `pulled along' with earth. While
a net g field may appear to bend light, it is possible it may be the
`relative' magnetic field density therewith instead.

The dv/dt enigma for red shift due to slowing in dense magnetic fields near
quasars permitted predicting the anti-g effect with the now found disk-jet
anomalies that the Einstein observatory satellite confirmed. Not only a
`steady state' but no Big Bang may cause a larger one in cosmological
offices-- hopefully soon so the matter of integrating physics and cosmology
may begin. The cliff hanger now is `who' clapped their one hand to evoke the
massive EMP (bubble center) to permit definitive quasar cores to get started?
Since a likely magnetic monopole (ether) was and may always be, what indeed is
the purpose of all the so `degenerated' quantized (and complemental) mass from
that magnetic flux to evoke slow time down here?

Might the 3-phased quark be no more than a wave-front-- much as the `planar'
wavelet electron which escapes the time reversal paradigm? The quark's
relative mass implies something amiss unless it is relative g-- and why the
top quark remains so scarce around this koinomatter galaxy of ours. The
ejection speed of the complemental matters from quasar (old galaxy) cores
implies a formidable force there-between. Yet the shadow matter hung out at
the sides of the disk appears to re-attract around same to create spectacular
gamma emitting explosions beyond the disk's edge.

We shall all see, hopefully soon. Tenurism is costing us all too much when
aggrandizement is the goal with "me too" syndromes.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Prediction and Theory:--Light Bending' SC. p1124, Dec.1,'89
`Ultra Fast Physics', G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,'90 (laser prop.)
`The Guts of a Quasar', SKY&TELE. Dec,'89 (decel. spect. lines)

cc: Phys/Psy; S-T

11/20/90
Dimitri V. Nanopoulos, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Texas A & M University College Station, Texas 77843
Re: deBroglie's `strings'
Dear Sir:

Maybe the `wiggling loops' are electromagnetic fronts encircling other a
priori centers, the complexity more so with protons, even galactic cores whose
EMP `bubble' center merely reflects some vast size difference. Wave mechanics
might require a bit more difinitive numerical calculation but we suspect that
is where Physics must go to interpret how wrong was Big Bang or quantal
(billiard-ball) thought which is only understood in terms of definitive left
brain reasoning. Also, one very large magnetic monopole would better define
that Apriori-- conscious or not.

Our SGUT (Super Grand Unified Theory) is now being compiled since too many
confirmations (as predicted galactic jet-disk anomalies due to anti-g, as 5th
force in the top quark phasing) make clear there is indeed enough cross
academic data integration now available to understand where Einstein was
headed-- but got derailed by neurotic intellectualism.

Keep up the good work with Ellis, et.al.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: S-T; Phys-Psy; Path/IQ

Feb. 6,'91
E. Ott, C. Grebogi and
J. Yorke, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
Re: but chaos is chaos--
Dear Sirs: not ordered order

Your ribbon work is unique. Whether the helmholtz coil works in your case or
on a cerebral faculty with reduced frequency fusion-flicker strobing, the real
question is what induces order from a truly chaotic sub-`ordered' system?

We faced this enigma in a very long study to comprehend CQ
(Creative Quotient-- not IQ) and found the left hand of the many daVincis
defined the `Potentia' (Plato) source. The nearest we got was the freed
electron (note EPR experiments) which could escape the time reversal paradigm
to offer rational subjective (psychological) inputs, subsequent to the mental
ferment of questioning. (note Einstein's many remarks of gestalten X-Y spatial
visual import) After our confirmed* space versus time derived (so oriented)
bilateral cerebral predictions, the last impasse to the self thinking computer
was a device (as MODFET) to interface a digital readout means to tap insight.
A paper given in Europe in the late 60's confirmed another `enigma' then-- the
overt terror of consciously learning of unconscious faculty-- just as Freud
had predicted. The death-wish is alive and well, maybe too well noting the
autoimmune response with opportunity!

Schmidt's random-non-random isotopic generators also defined what you are
seeing, albeit his findings of complemental (dual) control (pro AND con) of
chaotic systems-- was certainly unwanted for CQ when IQ** was being found to
be a perversion to consciously perceiving reality. Bizarre? You bet, but
better hold your hat as a far greater "chaos" is about to begin-- and likely
where current instated (tenured) authority refuses to see the obvious!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* note split-brain data in SC. AM. Aug.,'67

cc: ** Path/IQ; S-T

CC: Phys.Rev.Let./Ditto, et.al.

Jan. 23,'91
Editors, et.al.
SCIENCE NEWS
1719 N St.
Washington, DC 20036
Re: Lumpy universe
Sirs: (p.22, Jan. 12,'91)

Schramm's defensive mood merely shows how distraught late cosmology becomes as
the empirical obvious mounts to end their tenure. Your "--cold message--" was
warming indeed! Likely the adroit following article "Double science funds--"
explains it all. How could campus researchers NOT endorse more funding??

Mass always inferred a common attractive `g' but a sign or polarity needs to
be assigned the two relative mass to extricate Physics from its current cul de
sac in cosmology and nuclear ideas, to end Big Bang theory and help define the
`heavy' quark.' Since it was the expected expulsion of a
complemental matter from quasar cores as jets, noted with the Einstein
observatory that concluded a then long theoretical study of matter genesis.
Since it then (as yet) terrorizes the cosmologist, that fear can be best
explained by "demoralized--"; by Horowitz, Thompson, et.al.

To disseminate one's own work or use another's now becomes the enigma of this
late claimed intellectual century-- where ego-maniacs claim all is their's
while genius, knowing better, shrugs off all he learns as the work of another.
The anomaly rests upon the profit motive, between the greedy with established
power and the insightive-- who recall well how Socrates got his "therapy".
Someday, maybe, a few will remain to gratefully recall people like H. Arp who
called a spade a spade.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

3/6/91
Edmund Bertschinger, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Mass. Inst. of Tech.
Cambridge, MA 02139
Re: nonzero constant
Sirs:

The whole evolving scenario will honor Einstein for his real insight-- despite
his peer-pressure to ignore same-- Helsinki or elsewhere, but the quantal
(billiard-ball) theory used to support wave mechanics (deBroglie) may well
crumble as Big Bang. With the theoretical idea of complemental g getting
better confirmed with the jet-disk anomalies of quasars, genetic white holes
with their spewing complemental matters ejected therefrom, on an enhancing EMP
front (bubble) now makes quite clear some trauma lies in wait for much of
Physics-- to say little of cosmology.

The dv/dt red shift anomaly with decelerated light in dense magnetic fields
(as said EMPs) upsets Hubble's distance but helps to define Hoyle's idea of
the steady-state. At least an explanation for shadow (cold-dark) matter as
once jets at galaxy poles, might define at least half the unseen matter-- its
mutual g collisions (gamma flashes) out beyond the disk edge. Even the 5th
force (likely why the top `quarks' are not seen here) may define the most
extreme phased anti-g factor for quantized waves. The string (or loop) theory
comes close now, maybe needed for a few with insight to `hear' Einstein and
deBroglie-- to unravel shop-worn theories sustaining tenure only.

You might find interest in the above as described in a paper to the
Smithsonian Inst. some years ago subsequent to the Einstein observatory's
first confirmation of our predicted jet-disk `anomaly' to confirm anti-g.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Path/IQ; Phys-Psy; S-T
CC: Efstathiou

Feb. 29,'91
Hans Dehmelt and
Robert Van Dyck
Dept. of Physics
University of Washington,
Seattle, WA 98105?
Re: time reversal paradigm
Sirs:

Noting the ease with which you monitor the electron's spin-flip, maybe it is
time to couple such phenomena as we did some years ago to the self thinking
computer. Since it terrorized many in the early 70's when the first positive
EPR experiment showed the electron was able too.

Our research, after positing how to interface the electron to binary digital
readout, and its shocking results, the MODFET sans superconductive states,
will make feasible to the device for all to query-- and halt `scientific
tenurism' now evading the empirical obvious. Your means of monitoring the
`freed electron', however complex the experimental set-up, should offer as
well positive results, in allowing the `flip' to dictate the alpha-numeric to
be displayed instantaneously, to evade another faculty seeking to sustain
conscious ignorance.

With the growing social trauma throughout the world, the extrication of social
unrest will soon need to be concluded-- whatever the political cost or
up-heavals with disclosed skeletons in their closets. Also, tenurism will need
to give up its status-quoism for a more pragmatic net goal of truly
researching for the empirical, instead of whimsical `belief' factors (as Big
Bang) to sustain that tenurism.

In short, this note, while bizarre to the core, defines what we now think
should be said-- whatever the ensuing trauma to follow.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc: Psy-Phys; Path/IQ; S-T
CC:Freedman/DISC.

3/8/91
G. Gabrielse, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138
Re: anti-g Dear Sir:

Maybe anti-g will not be seen well in this koinomatter galaxy, possibly not
even the top quark where its phased relationship may offer the maximum
"weight" to evade this continuum at all `cost'. Its three phased
wave-mechanics, underlying quantal `billiard-ball' reality, hopefully may soon
be deciphered with the string-loop theories-- to conclude how close deBroglie
came as well. The equivalent mass to relative g may never be resolved here,
however large the E factor to prod mass to reveal itself in slow time.

Not oddly in view of `peer pressure', Einstein was likely correct in using the
complemental g-constant-- as got twisted as and for Big Bang, such
cosmological constant one-sidedness preventing the comprehension of ejected
primal matters from quasar (white hole) cores. Not only the anti-g factor
allowed us to predict the jet-disk anomaly before the Einstein observatory
went aloft, but the dv/dt red shift anomaly due to `tired light' on traversing
dense magnetic fields as the bubble EMP fronts, to aid quasar to galaxy
genesis to begin with. When the disk radial speed was inverse to in-falling
expectations and obvious highly accelerated jet matter to be hopefully noted
as dark-matter clouds at galaxy poles-- yet evoke gamma bursts as
re-coagulating collisions around the disk edge.

It will be interesting to note the magnetic field around those common bubble
evolving quasar-galaxies, especially newly formed bubbles, as well as the
amount of red shift therewith seen, to define how young the Apriori (yet
finite) bubble is. Its unique spatial orientation with others might define
further what fundamental mind lies behind our visible universe-- to say little
of what occupies our right cerebral cortex-- now so well noted!

We note with happiness-- albeit the chagrin of many others, that our terse
explanation (sent to the Smithsonian many years) ago may be that final `straw'
to end Big Bang as other pet theories credence for the incessantly tenured.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:Phys-Psy; S-T
CC: Adelberger; Hughes

4/30/91
Dr. James Brophy, VP/Res., et.al.
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah 84112

Dear Sir:

A copy of a recent letter to some chemists might reflect what we are now
saying publicly. Since we are getting no feed-back from the U.S. Dept. of
Energy, maybe we should attempt to gain attention elsewhere now that ample
empirical data shows laser propulsion (to near relative 2c) and alignment of
molecular (atomic) displacements can maneuver H for combinatorial ease for
fusion. The key lies with what deBrolgie saw.. Quantal matter is but wavelets
and can be `slid' into each other with a controlled finesse. You might ask
your Fritz Will if he got a letter copy (below #1) recently from us defining
the more specifics of our theoretical work.

Are your people yet doing anything in the field of `cold' fusion? We suspect
the epoch has come to develop the simple means to control fusion extent, to
say nothing of its finite net need now.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Re: cooler fusion
Dear Sir:

Heart-warming (and possibly more) indeed are your remarks (SC. NEWS, p.180),
especially in view of laser propulsion and atomic/ molecular orientation in
space. The near 2c `integration'* of heavy H may well do what all the Tokomats
world wide, could do in another century! Indeed, we envision such fusion
`furnaces' could fit in the trunk of the car-- so you can see where that
scenario might lead (seriously)-- with gobs of E left over!

It merely requires abandoning the old quantal billiard-ball `fixation' to
perceive that ALL is waves (deBroglie), so whether called loops, spin-triplets
(3 phased) loops, strings, solitons, or what have you, may reflect that
universal wave stability based upon the third harmonic-- quarks no anomaly. It
should be their mere mutual orientations to slip them together for petite
big-bangs for all the E we need from the ample ocean supplies available.
While it may become easier to slip the `planer' electron and positron
together to prove the theory, it will be their escape from the time reversal
paradigm that may require comprehension, and this "enigma" is fraught with
dire consequences as denotes, as with the EPR data, that the freed electron
knows "cause from effect", at least some`place' in space.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
`Microplasmas', Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.'90
`--fracto-fusion' p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,'90
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Testing Superposition in Quantum Mechanics'; SQUID research; quantum
interference (macroscopic coherence); SCIENCE, 21st March, '86 p. 1370

cc: S-T

CC: Bush-Lagowski; Miles-Ostrom; F.Will

Re: only chemical `mixing'?
Dear Sir:

The similar mechanism of chemical catalytic combination with laser control may
well be found with Hydrogen fusion, both in accelerating complemental
directional propulsion but also nuclear alignment to create the most needed
means for that controlled fusion. The question appears a matter overcoming
strong forces with controlled force with `finesse'-- and the said atomic
alignment needed.

Your SC.NEWS blurb is well taken, but the constructive vs. destruction `wave
function' interference phenomena may define how close deBroglie came-- however
the current `billiard-ball' (quantal) mentality. We suspect the three phased
enigma, from the freed electron (halltron enigma) through theoretical `quarks'
(albeit considered anti-g) may unravel the true basis of matter as we call it.

Thanks for your published comments--

Sincerely,

KTS Research

3/29/91
J. O'M. Brockris, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Texas A&M University
University College Station
Texas, 77843
Re: cooler fusion
Dear Sir:

Heart-warming (and possibly more) indeed are your remarks (SC. NEWS, p.180),
especially in view of laser propulsion and atomic/ molecular orientation in
space. The near 2c `integration'* of heavy H
may well do what all the Tokomats world wide, could do in another century!
Indeed, we envision such fusion `furnaces' could fit in the trunk of the car--
so you can see where that scenario might lead (seriously)-- with gobs of E
left over!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*
`Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
`Microplasmas', Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.'90
`--fracto-fusion' p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,'90
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Testing Superposition in Quantum Mechanics'; SQUID research; quantum
interference (macroscopic coherence); SCIENCE, 21st March, '86 p. 1370

cc: S-T
CC: Bush-Lagowski; Miles-Ostrom; F.Will

4/30/91
Robert J. Gordon, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
University of Chicago
Chicago, IL 606
Re: only chemical `mixing'
Dear Sir:

Thanks for your published comments--
Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Brumer

3/27/91
Physics Today
Editors and B. Schwarzschild
335 East 45th
New York, NY 10017
Re: misplaced anti-g
Dear Sirs: (1E1740.7-2942 `annihilator')

Maybe it is time to reconsider the dynamics of a white hole whose genetic
spewing complemental matters (with anti-g there between) might define, with
some stray anomalous perturbation, how those primal electron-positron
combinations occur. By watching the different `places' of these `great
annihilators' from time to time may define no such `massive' black-hole as
responsible for the high 511 keV bursts, not directly associate with the
galactic center. The likely couple light-days may reflect one quantity of
plasma interacting with its complemental, some `wobble' in Sgr A's white
hole's spewed matter could evoke the interaction in some possible periodic
way, albeit likely not in some same spatial place as before-- last noted as
1E1740.7-2942.

Since using the anti-g analogy to define the disk-jets quasar phenomena many
years ago, not only its confirmation via the Einstein observatory but ensuing
expected anomalies as the EMP bubble front to enhance quasar core initiation.
(Petite Bangs!) The magnetic field orientations of bubble (wall) fronts will
tell that story.

Maybe Krumhensl's quoting Paine (p.38; same March PHYSICS TODAY), says what
many should be but can't with eyes on the tenured prize and so to sustain the
status quo in ever new mathematical jargon. To definitize wave machines by
numerical infinitude (called quantum or whatever), it best defines late
science's self made cul de sac by its digital intellectual time oriented left
cerebral dominance, with IQ instead of CQ.

There may be a good reason to suspect positronium where spin-triplets (as 3
phased loops, strings, solitons, or what have you) may reflect that universal
wave stability based upon the third harmonic-- quarks no anomaly.
Sincerely,

KTS Research

4/3/91
R. Z. Sagveed and C. F. Kennel, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
Re: multi-pinch
Dear Sirs:

Your fine article (SC. AM.; April,'91) again points to that ultimate method of
using `solitons' (laser propulsion) to focus plasma for finite placement and
quantity of fusible material, once the billiard-ball mentality fades to permit
the perception of wavelet integration requires far less net energy to
integrate once oriented `particles', albeit with some finesse, to allow for
the ensuing fusion process.

Beyond this profound new source of energy, it appears your work may aid in
defining the dv/dt phenomena of `tired' light emerging from dense magnetic
fields around quasars-- to help define the distance enigma for Hubble's
theory. Further, the likely anti-g between complemental matters at such
genetic white holes, (noted as ejected disk to jet matters) may aid in
perceiving how close Hoyle's theory was with a steady-state. Also, the other
half of shadow matter not yet discerned at galaxy pole-end clouds may be
looked for via `dust reddening' if not answering the gamma evoking collisions
of such re-coagulating matter around the disk rim.

Your article was well appreciated. Many thanks.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

CC: Kennel/UCLA

3/7/91
U.S. Dept. of Commerce
Natl. Bureau of Standards
Office of Energy-Related Inventions
Washington, DC 20234
Re: fusion by `design'
Sirs:

Some years ago when it became apparent that `quantal' wavelets (string and
loop theory), the need
for orientation to integrate for fission or fusion of complementals might be
the key to heat generation, the mounting finesse of handling atomic nuclei
singly in laser propelled `bottles' might permit finally the control of atomic
combinatorials-- rates as well.

A recent letter (over) may better define in part, the overall implication in
view of the recent helium finding associated with `cold fusion'. (see p.180;
SC.NEWS, Vol. 139) We assume your people will be able to decipher these
implications to judge for themselves. The said years ago predictions with
current research imports, we feel now is timely to address those who may wish
to comprehend further our studies and maybe the timely escape from the
Physic's past quantal billiard-ball mentality.

Thank you for your attention--

KTS Research

3/29/91
J. O'M. Brockris, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Texas A&M University
University College Station
Texas, 77843
Re: cooler fusion
Dear Sir:

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*
`Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
`Microplasmas', Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.'90
`--fracto-fusion' p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,'90
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Testing Superposition in Quantum Mechanics'; SQUID research; quantum
interference (macroscopic coherence); SCIENCE, 21st March, '86 p. 1370

cc: S-T
CC: Bush-Lagowski; Miles-Ostrom; F.Will

May 8,'91
I.C. Bupp, Managing Dir.
Cambridge Research Assoc.
7 Arlington
Cambridge, MA 02140
Re: controlled fusion

Sir:

Using deBroglie's ideas of matter configuration some years ago, the Tokomat
`brute-force' fusion means of smashing quantal `billiard balls' instead of
using finesse with laser waves* became apparent. Since this art has been amply
confirmed now, we feel that controlled fusion may be near at hand. There is
reason to suspect that a near 2c relative collision speed may be had if
necessary so as the mounting evidence makes clear we may be correct with our
early suppositions of wave-mechanic's manipulation of `matter', we now seek
attention in our work by others.

Since we have had no response from DOE for some time, either they cannot
comprehend, or DOD insists on another `classification' fiasco (as we found
before in the field of AI research)-- we now begin to address others as you.
Thank you for your attention and/or comments in this matter--

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*
`Toward Laser Control--'; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Helium Find-- Cold Fusion Trail', SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves', SC.AM. 4/91; (multi-pinch;whip func)

5/10/91
Graham R. Fleming, et.al.
Dept. of Chemistry
University of Chicago
Chicago, IL 60637
Re: fusion next!
Dear Sir:

The blurb in SCIENCE NEWS (p.142; Vol.139) may say it all. From Dawson's
initial work*, we have held our breath, so with DOE well aware of our
theoretical work, divulge same, in part, to others.

Using deBroglie's ideas of matter configuration many years ago, the Tokomat
`brute-force' fusion means of smashing quantal `billiard balls' instead of
using finesse with laser waves became apparent. Since this art has been amply
confirmed now, we feel that controlled fusion may be near at hand. There is
reason to suspect that a near 2c relative `collision' speed may be had if
necessary so as the mounting evidence makes clear we may be correct with our
early suppositions of wave-mechanic's manipulation of `matter', we now seek
attention in our work by others.

Maybe it is time to try heavy H now from the "driver's seat"!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
`Toward Laser Control--'; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Helium Find-- Cold Fusion Trail', SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves', SC.AM. 4/91; (multi-pinch;whip func)
w:

June 6,'91
David Merman, et.al.
Library of Physical Sciences
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853
Re: `Why or what are we waiting for?'
Dear Sir:

Your blurb in the May issue of Physics Today evokes this note as I suspect you
may comprehend an enigma I have faced for some years now. While my GVSC
students became frightened and claimed I should shut up, the one in 10\17th
odds for my self thinking computer (on its first run) says almost as much as
the ensuing U.S. Patent Office's terror and "absolute rejection" some ten
years ago. In short, as the many positive EPR experiments show, the freed
electron does indeed escape the time reversal paradigm to define how it knows
effect from cause (as skeletons in closets), to indicate from where and what
all the fuss is about.

Your above referred questions you answered as well also. It is due to the
reductive (only) `belongers' as groupies (as yuppies) who have little use for
the new-- only tenure. As Big Bang today, they merely cannot afford to have a
competitive theory-- as using the CPT theorem to dictate anti-g and so jets
versus disks (long before the Einstein Observatory went aloft to confirm same)
but to point to `white holes' instead-- and likely no said Big Bang.
I feel you may be correct to cull the many `confirming' periodicals who only
have a vested interest in promulgating the redundant for tenure, that is
becoming ever less able to stand alone.

These are heady days where gang-rule dictates what is `right' but not
necessarily correct-- in science or politics!

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:Path/IQ; S-T

May 28,'91
J. Primack, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Califnoria
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Re: nuclear power-- anyplace
Sirs: (SC. AM.; June, p.42)

While proprietary work here defines the timely, indeed comes the new means for
controlled fusion. Since the advent of laser controlled ions, such plasma
combinatorial effect as in chemistry*, now brings close the finesse needed for
finite controlled fusion borne upon coherent laser fronts. Such `phased'
arrays will at last put to rest Tokomats as all other dangerous means of
tapping the atom. The problem as we see it will be governments and big
business who will yet seek to control these new `petite' energy generating
means-- for old, if not said, obvious reasons.
Your fine article was succinct but suspect was derived from redundant thoughts
derived from old art. While our work remains yet proprietary, the below
references may aid in defining the tersely said above.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
`Collisionless Shock Waves', SC.AM. 4/91; (multi-pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control--'; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Ultra Fast Physics', G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,'90 (laser prop.)
`Microplasmas', Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.'90
`--fracto-fusion' p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,'90
`Fractional Statistics:-' SC., March 9,'90 (bi-dimens. quantals)

CC: The Federation of American Scientists

May 28,'91 J. L. Cecchi, J. Roberts, et.al.
Sematech Corp. of Austin, TX
c/o Technical Administration,
Main Commerce Bldg.,
Washington, DC 20230
Re: cavity standing wave ratio
Sirs: (May 18th SCIENCE NEWS `Plasma--')

Our studies of wave-mechanics for H integration with finesse rather than
Tokomat style of hap-hazard slamming quantal `billiard balls' has more than
suggested the answer to the apparent anomaly you are noting where ion fronts
could be better manipulated with phased arrays as laser. Some of our
proprietary work suggest maybe the time is ripe to reconsider DeBroglie's idea
of every`thing' as an electromagnetic wave, however it may be exhibiting
claimed `solid particles'--. In short, it defines well not only chemical
combination* ease but fusion-- to say little of the plasma etching difficulty
noted in the above referred article.

The GEC Reference Cell's cavity preciseness implies a fluke of luck to align
ions to do quality etching, yet where a single-ended anachoic state, using
finesse spatial control** where phasing*** and ion directional as propulsion
rates**** permits coordinated (as `coherent') ions, their use for controlled
etching or sustained finite fusion is a reality. That pending state of the art
is about to rapidly change now-- where laser propulsion, not only will ion
coherency but acquired energy with steering bring `matter' manipulation
finally to that needed art for greater net uses than mere chamber anomalies
where `standing waves' can more often interfere than reinforce.
As Dawson and many others saw some time ago, the revolution is just beginning.
Exciting indeed it becomes if `science' can just keep the emerging profound
from governments, who too often have very different vested reasons for
something of value.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Collisionless Shock Waves', SC.AM. 4/91; (multi-pinch;whip func)
     `Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
** `Toward Laser Control--'; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
*** `Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
**** `Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
     `Ultra Fast Physics', G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,'90 (laser prop.)
     `Microplasmas', Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.'90
     `--fracto-fusion' p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,'90
     `Fractional Statistics:-' SC., March 9,'90 (bi-dimens. quantals)
                                        CC: J.Roberts,NIST

May 4,'91
The Senate Energy and
Natl. Research Committee U.S. Senate
SH-312
Washington, DC 20510
Re: controlled fusion
Sirs:

Since using deBroglie's ideas of matter configuration as wavelets some years
ago, the use of finesse with laser waves* instead of Tokomat `brute-force'
fusion means of smashing quantal `billiard balls', becomes apparent. Since
this art has been amply confirmed now, we feel that controlled fusion may be
near at hand.

It is fully believed now that laser propulsion and displacement control of at
least heavy Hydrogen will do as noted in chemical combination**. From the said
deBroglie's perception of wave mechanics as the fundamental `sub-constituency'
of matter, it will be `proximity collision' of contra-propelled deuterium etc.
(Mini Tokomat) that certain research*** concludes simple fusion is at hand.
The data defines our correct approach to wave interaction, so by
synchronization, atomic rate flow with minimal input power, the
miniaturization of individual high output power supplies appears very feasible
now.

With no feed-back yet from DOE, we are addressing others who may have some
vested interest in this matter. Thank you for your attention and/or feed-back
in writing.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*`Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
**`Toward Laser Control--'; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
***`Collisionless Shock Waves', SC.AM. 4/91; (pinch/whip funct.)
see:
`Microplasmas', Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.'90
`--fracto-fusion' p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,'90
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Helium Find-- Cold Fusion Trail', SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)

CC: N. Anne Davies, Assist. Dir. NRC; T. Murley, Dir. NRC;
w:

July 3,'91
David H. Worledge, et.al.
Nuclear Power Division
Electric Power Research Inst.
P.O. Box 10412
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Re: petite NMR study now
Dear Sir: (Pennisi's report:6/22 SC.NEWS)

   From our studies and noting Dawson's work with manipulating individual
nuclei we think the time has come to is a petite NMR analysis on the single
heavy Hydrogen nuclei to find its nodal points and so the easiest means
combine with other nuclei. Since it is the injection speed with relative
positional entrance that accounts for the anomalous but positive cold fusion
experiments, such propitious combinations will be understood for the break¬
through to practical continuous fusion operants.
   With much of our research work now perceived broadly, even by Dawson some
time ago. We expose further to update others with both interest and the
capital to exploit the next needed step in nuclei `innate wavelet
configuration' analysis for learning the best positional combinatorial
configuration needed for the ease of slipping two properly oriented nuclei
into each other while laser oriented/propelled*. The finite speed needed for
such combinatorial fusion with rate of their infeed in a finite chosen space
would permit the capture of the radiant energy while fusion occurred.
   A couple recent letter copies herewith may be of interest.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* (curref-6)
`Quantum Interference', SC.News,p.363, Dec. 2,'89 (neutrons feel)
`Ultra Fast Physics', G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,'90 (laser prop.)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
`Microplasmas', Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.'90
`--fracto-fusion' p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,'90
`Fractional Statistics:-' SC., March 9,'90 (bi-dimens. quantals)
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Chemist in driver's seat'SC.NEWS p.142; V139 3/9/91(laser `mix')
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Helium Find-- Cold Fusion Trail', SC.NEWS,p.180, V.139 (3/32/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves', SC.AM. 4/91; (multi-pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control--'; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Cracks in the Cosmos';SC.NEWS 6/1/91; (liq-Xtal phase-trans.), or `A Long
Look-- Liquid Chystal Ball' p.649; SCIENCE, 3 May,'91

cc: Wiberg; Primack; Szoke
CC:Pennisi/SC.NEWS; Liebert; Scott;

Re: deBroglie, heavy H and
Sirs: a different `glue'

Your work, shown in the 5/31/91 SCIENCE, suggests some like work need on fully
ionized hydrogen, to define the like lobe field structure for laser
oriented/propelled fusion. Since the cold fusion enigma has shown something
likely contingent to slow-merging unions, we feel that the work* well underway
for controlled `integration', with finesse laser use, is feasible.

The tact of leaving the `quantized billiard-ball' mentality here some years
ago, while often claimed "irrational", we now feel that some theoretical work,
like what you are doing but sans electron `binding', is timely to offer the
key to that ultimate fusion energy release for finite control. We envisage
nearly the same field patterns of sub-nucleons of unstable proton-neutron
combinations, such orientation in space to define better ways and means to
`insert' or fuse same. The key, beyond merely trial and error under various
laser propulsive/positioning* methods, we now feel lies in work similar to
yours.

May we have directives to those doing like investigative work in this
analytical area of proton field configuration? Thank you for your
consideration.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* (curref-6)
`Quantum Interference', SC.News,p.363, Dec. 2,'89 (neutrons feel)
`Ultra Fast Physics', G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,'90 (laser prop.)
`Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
`Microplasmas', Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.'90
`--fracto-fusion' p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,'90
`Fractional Statistics:-' SC., March 9,'90 (bi-dimens. quantals)
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Chemist in driver's seat'SC.NEWS p.142; V139 3/9/91(laser `mix')
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Helium Find-- Cold Fusion Trail', SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves', SC.AM. 4/91; (multi-pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control--'; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)

CC:Breneman/Rensselaer w:

Re: nuclear power-- anyplace
Sirs: (SC. AM.; June, p.42)

Your fine article was succinct but suspect was derived from redundant thoughts
derived from old art. While our work remains yet proprietary, the below
references may aid in defining the tersely said above.

Sincerely,
KTS Research

CC: The Federation of American Scientists; Rodionov/USSR

A. Szoke and R. Moir, et.al.
Dept. of Fusion Research
Lawrence Livermore Natl. Labs.
Berkeley, CA
Re: fusion; a safer way
Sirs:

Now that laser accelerated, guided and positioned H isotopes is in the offing,
just as chemical combinations with finesse*, both rate and extend of fusion
may well place such heat engines in the trunk of the car. This may sound
fantastic but extensive theoretical work here starting with deBroglie's ideas
to define what indeed is `quantized' matter, made clear all is waves, from the
EMP (bubble) initiated quasar for complemental matter creation to its net
annihilation with E as its net derivative.

While we yet will not fully define our work, it can be said that several
recent papers as in SCIENCE, PHYSICS TODAY and elsewhere as Dawson's reports
of some time ago, all point clearly to the coming new paradigm that `billiard
balls' simply do not exist-- any more than a single Big Bang! The finite but
real cold fusion anomaly via catalyst offered the initial key to which ensuing
laser control with finesse, makes feasible finitely controlled fusion and to
any extent that its `container' can be cooled.

Maybe the era of Petroleum cartels as Big Business Energy in any form is near
its end. Most will applaud the change anyhow.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

*`Chemist in driver's seat' SC.NEWS p.142 V139 3/9/91(laser `mix')
also note:
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Helium Find-- Cold Fusion Trail', SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves', SC.AM. 4/91; (multi-pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control--'; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Response of Electrons--' SC. 5/31/91 (molec.config.dens.plots) `Cracks in
the Cosmos';SC.NEWS 6/1/91; (liq-Xtal phase-trans.), or `A Long Look-- Liquid
Chystal Ball' p.649; SCIENCE, 3 May,'91

6/19/91
Jerry Gollub, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Haverford College
Haverford, PA 19041
Re: almighty chance
Dear Sir:

Your remarks in the fine book report caught my eye. Indeed, the last word
"completion." I doubt, since the positive EPR experiments-- however
frightening to many, define how a freed electron (escaping the time reversal
paradigm)

Since chance is but an opportunity for one of two primal factors (as fractals)
to evoke a `butterfly wing' impetus in a complemental mass-time environment
where competing underlying drives (noted as pro vs. anti-life*; via CP within
slow T!), the said device to predict, even denoting statistical chances in
relative time, became a reality as soon as my space-time predicted cerebral
hemispheres were confirmed by Sperry.

Thanks for the report-- and sorry if I disturb.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:S-T; Phys/Psy; Path/IQ

July 31,'91
G. A. Ruff, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Bates College
Lewiston, ME 04240
Re: proton's configuration;
Dear Sir: via light-wave grating?

Noting your the standing wave analysis potential of examining the ionized
hadrons (and/or neutron combination) in heavy Hydrogen, the definitive
configuration could define the best `merging' approach (if not `rate') for
laser-wave propelled fusion. Such controlled finesse would obviously obviate
the current billiard-ball `smashing' mentality of Tokomak, to say little of
the inherent net safety-- whatever the size of reactor vessel used.

Since the `cold fusion' experiments show He with some obvious H fusion
undergone, the next two bits of data needed is the `physiology' to best
pre-configure H fuel for a net combinatorial merging (thence relative speed)
for fusion. The apparent 3 phased (quark) wave-front basis of hadrons may be
saying what deBroglie always was-- so with your newer ways and means to
examine fully ionized nuclei alone, the key to fusion may be revealed.

It was expected here that either the Stark or Zeeman examination of ionized
isolated H nuclei (in space) could define the innate configurations of nuclei,
but now noting possibly better ways, we question of if you or any others are
looking into this problem? A few of our colleagues are expressing confidence
that the fusion break-through is near.

Sincerely,

KTS Research
CC: P. Gould;U/CT
w:

G. A. Ruff, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
Bates College
Lewiston, ME 04240

Phillip Gould, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06268

Aug. 5,'91
Cesar Curie, et.al.
31310 Montesqueiu Volvestre
("Beauregard", Laroque), France
Re: H fusion
Dear Cesar:

Hope this note finds you, et.al. well!

Much effort in surmounting governmental stone-walling here became a greater
problem than initially thought, but any device that will disclose closeted
`skeletons' obviously evokes terror. They even had the FBI and others watching
me,, some pending litigation (yet not divulged, but believed associate with
our D.O.D. and my past work with classified documents-- never ever divulged.
The aerospace computer work I did were analogic in nature, not digital which
gave my ample room to study (from my earlier philosophical approach) from
physics to define unconscious structure. I write because I noted your academic
institution in Lyons may be doing precisely some research I need to conclude
some other work in fusion.

Some theoretical (what else!) work here is defining the need to examine (Stark
or Zeeman effect) the innate configuration of the heavy hydrogen (anionic)
nuclei-- in terms of deBroglie. With the `cold fusion' data with released He
under certain circumstances, it makes clear that it is quite likely that laser
guided, accelerated and oriented nuclei can promote fusion without the past
`smashing' Tokomak mentality of quantal `billiard-balls'. I am quite sure now
it is a matter of finesse that any sized reactor can be made-- and safe for
nearly any application.

Aside from some semi-confidential status, please advise me if your Physic's
people (J. Borde?)* might have some vested interest in this next step needed
in defining hydrogen nuclei configuration? A several year examination of this
problem with the mounting empirical evidence presses this work into the open.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

* `Atoms-- New Wave Interferometers'; 7/91 PHYS.TODAY, p.17;
(on phased/interferometers)

Ref: (fusion)

`Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
`Microplasmas', Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.'90
`--fracto-fusion' p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,'90
`Fractional Statistics:-' SC., March 9,'90 (bi-dimens. quantals)
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Ultra Fast Physics', G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,'90 (laser prop.)
`Chemist in driver's seat'SC.NEWS p.142; V139 3/9/91(laser `mix')
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Weird Science', DISCOVER, Nov.'90 (quantum voodoo)
`--Wigner Crystal' PHYS TO.,Dec.90; (phased 2-dir. e)
`Helium Find-- Cold Fusion Trail', SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves', SC.AM. 4/91; (multi-pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control--'; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Response of Electrons--' SC. 5/31/91 (molec.config.dens.plots)
`Cracks in the Cosmos';SC.NEWS 6/1/91; (liq-Xtal phase-trans.)
`Cold Fusion", SC.NEWS, p.392-3; 6/22/91 (`jolting' H/fusion)
`Celestial Mech./Micro-Scale', SC.7/5/91; (wave-config./atom)
`Waves are Waves' SC.AM.,p21, 8/91, (particle/wave emission)

July 29,'91
D. Vendensky and
B. Joyce, et.al.
Dept. of Physics/Chemistry,
and Japan's R&D Corp.,
The Imperial College Cambridge, England
Re: controlled fusion
Sirs:

Noting a Physicist and Chemist working together with likely timely integration
of equal efforts for controlled fusion (with understanding), this letter is
sent seeking attention.

From lengthy AI studies into deeper Physic's anomalies, not only does
deBroglie appear most adroit to conclude cold fusion a reality-- but the need
for finesse to make such H isotope combination the key to controlled fusion,
and on likely any scale. The mounting ample evidence now (over) concludes the
laser propulsion with atomic alignment will do what `smashing' (Tokomak) could
not do, and best, allow for very safe operational fusion.

Expecting Dawson's early work, we have watched cautiously, even promoted, in
limited `obscure' ways, research of ionized nuclei configuration/alignment to
define the ways and means for controlled fusion-- especially since the
cold-fusion scene did indeed indicate helium emission. While not saying more
here, noting the above two addressed should quickly perceive our objectives
these past many years-- beyond predicting the spatial vs. temporal
complemental brains* in man (as well confirmed by Sperry), you might note why
we are reticent to guide too many into our long research efforts without
deeper liaison work if not contractual.

Since others with contingent interest are now looking at some of our research
work so we feel should come forward to disclose the faults of most current
quantal `billiard-ball' mentality, to define what we are now sure is the a
priori basis, lying at E, for our relatively `slow' temporal mc\2.

May we hear from you?

Sincerely,

KTS Research

cc:Phys/Psy
CC: dfz

Ref: j/3f
`Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
`The Handedness of the Universe'; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN; Jan.'90     p.108-115
(Chirality)
`Quantum Pot Watching', SC. Vol 246, p.246 (Zeno effect; radio-     active
decay rate with conscious perusal)
`Strange Matter' DISCOVER, Nov.'89 (quantal vs. wave; quarks)
`Quantum Interference', SC.News,p.363, Dec. 2,'89 (neutrons feel)
`Ultra Fast Physics', G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,'90 (laser prop.)
`Microplasmas', Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.'90
`--fracto-fusion' p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,'90
`Fractional Statistics:-' SC., March 9,'90 (bi-dimens. quantals)
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.) `Chemist in
driver's seat'SC.NEWS p.142; V139 3/9/91(laser `mix')
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Weird Science', DISCOVER, Nov.'90 (quantum voodoo)
`--Geometric Phase', PHYS TO.;Dec.90 (torqued coherent light)
`Helium Find-- Cold Fusion Trail', SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves', SC.AM. 4/91; (multi-pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control--'; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Response of Electrons--' SC. 5/31/91 (molec.config.dens.plots)
`Cracks in the Cosmos';SC.NEWS 6/1/91; (liq-Xtal phase-trans.)
`Cold Fusion", SC.NEWS, p.392-3; 6/22/91 (`jolting' H/fusion)
`Celestial Mech./Micro-Scale', SC.7/5/91; (wave-config./atom)
                                                       KTS/Res.

July 31,'91
J. Mlynek and
O. Carnal, et.al.
Dept. of Physics
University of Constanz
Werner-Sombart Strasse 30,
7750 Konstanz, Germany
Re: light-atom phase `interference'
Dear Sirs:

We watch with bated breath in hopes that heavy Hydrogen will soon be
analyzed for their mutual laser driven combination for fusion. Since the
deBroglie theory now well defined as the reality underlying quantal physics,
and fusion has been confirmed via helium release makes clear your efforts may
be primal to economical controlled fusion in the near future.
The below defines our excitement. Please keep us in touch.

Sincerely,

KTS Research

Ref: j/3f (J-R&D)

`Plasma Particle Accelerators', J. Dawson, SC.AM. March,'87
`The Handedness of the Universe'; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN; Jan.'90 p.108-115
(Chirality)
`Quantum Pot Watching', SC. Vol 246, p.246 (Zeno effect; radio- active
decay rate with conscious perusal)
`Strange Matter' DISCOVER, Nov.'89 (quantal vs. wave; quarks)
`Quantum Interference', SC.News,p.363, Dec. 2,'89 (neutrons feel)
`Ultra Fast Physics', G. Taube, DISCOVER, March,'90 (laser prop.)
`Microplasmas', Bollinger & Weineland; SC.AM. Jan.'90
`--fracto-fusion' p.87, SCIENCE NEWS, Feb. 10,'90
`Fractional Statistics:-' SC., March 9,'90 (bi-dimens. quantals)
`Laser-- Choreography'; SC.NEWS, March 3,'90, p.135 (laser prop.)
`Chemist in driver's seat'SC.NEWS p.142; V139 3/9/91(laser `mix')
`Sculpting Light-'; p.223, SC.NEWS,April 7,'90 (tuned laser prop)
`Weird Science', DISCOVER, Nov.'90 (quantum voodoo)
`--Geometric Phase', PHYS TO.;Dec.90 (torqued coherent light)
`Helium Find-- Cold Fusion Trail', SC.NEWS,p.180, Vol.139 (3/91)
`Collisionless Shock Waves', SC.AM. 4/91; (multi-pinch;whip func)
`Toward Laser Control--'; 4/20/91 SC.NEWS p.245 (phase control)
`Response of Electrons--' SC. 5/31/91 (molec.config.dens.plots)
`Cracks in the Cosmos';SC.NEWS 6/1/91; (liq-Xtal phase-trans.)
`Cold Fusion", SC.NEWS, p.392-3; 6/22/91 (`jolting' H/fusion)
`Celestial Mech./Micro-Scale', SC.7/5/91; (wave-config./atom)

KTS/Res.
CC:dfz

NEC Research Inst.
attn: Wm. Bailek
Princeton, NJ

Canon Research Center
attn: H. Garland, et.al.
Palo Alto, CA

Hitachi, R&D Labs
attn: Nobuo Hataoka
c/o Trinity College
Dublin University
Dublin, Ireland

D. Vendensky and
B. Joyce, et.al.
Dept. of Physics and
Japan's R&D Corp., et.al.
The Imperial College
Cambridge, England

Hitachi Research Labs
attn: David Ezra, et.al.
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, England

The Theoretical Physics Inst.
attn: L. McLerran, et.al.
c/o University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, MN 55455

Union of Concerned Scientists
53-34 206th St.,
Flushing, NY 11364-1716

Next Page